The Kumho Ecsta Sport S vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 brings together two of the newest contenders in the ultra-high-performance segment. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has just launched in the USA, while the Ecsta Sport S arrives as Kumho’s latest flagship, and both have already delivered impressive results in European testing. With strong wet and dry performances from both sides, this is shaping up to be a true next-generation showdown between two fresh UHP heavyweights.
Table of Contents
Results: Kumho Ecsta Sport S vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Results below were taken from Tire Rack’s Ultra High Performance vs. Max Performance Summer Tires Test. A total of 11 tires were tested on Tire Rack’s proving ground including the max & ultra high performance summer tires. The graph below shows the comparison between Kumho Ecsta Sport S vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 based on the relevant performance category. The Kumho Ecsta Sport S was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
The tire size of interest is a 275/35R19 which is a common tire size for BMW M2 & M3. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle for this tire test is a 2024 BMW M2.
Wet
In wet braking, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S stops 1.5 feet shorter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, giving it a 1% advantage in emergency stopping. However, in wet handling feel, the Goodyear scores 0.81 points higher, delivering a 4% stronger subjective grip and confidence. On the wet track, the Goodyear is also 0.44 seconds faster, making it 1% quicker in lap time. Overall, the Kumho leads slightly in braking, but the Goodyear proves stronger and more consistent in wet handling performance.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 :
- -1% in wet braking
- +4% in wet handling (subj)
- +1% in wet handling (lap time)
Dry
In dry braking, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stops 3.8 feet shorter than the Kumho Ecsta Sport S, delivering a 4% advantage in stopping distance. In subjective dry handling, both tires score exactly the same, showing no difference in driver feel and balance. On the dry handling lap time, the Goodyear is 0.17 seconds faster, making it 1% quicker around the track. Overall, while both tires feel equally balanced in dry handling, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 edges ahead with shorter braking and a slightly faster dry lap.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 :
- +4% in dry braking
- 0% in dry handling (subj)
- +1% in dry handling (lap time)
Noise/Comfort/Ride Quality
In noise, comfort and ride quality, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S scores 0.66 points higher than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, delivering a 3% advantage in overall refinement.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 :
- -3% in average of Noise, Comfort & Ride Quality.
UTQG ratings
In UTQG treadwear, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 carries a 300 rating, compared to 260 for the Kumho Ecsta Sport S — a difference of 40 points, giving Goodyear a 15% higher treadwear rating on paper. Both tires share identical AA traction and A temperature grades, so their safety-related UTQG ratings are effectively equal.
For mileage warranty, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S is backed by a 30,000-mile warranty, while the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 comes with no mileage warranty.
| Brand | Tireline | Size | Tread Wear | Traction | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho | Ecsta Sport S | All | 260 | AA | A |
| Goodyear | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | All | 300 | AA | A |
Price
For size 275/35R19, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S is priced at $280, while the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 comes in at $310. That makes the Kumho $30 cheaper, giving it an 11% price advantage over the Goodyear.
Tire size: 275/35R19
- Ecsta Sport S : $ 280
- Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 : $ 310
Difference: -11% more cheaper for Ecsta Sport S.
Summary
From my perspective as a tire engineer, both are excellent new-generation UHP tires with different strengths.The Kumho Ecsta Sport S wins on value, comfort and slightly shorter wet braking, making it the smarter performance-per-dollar choice. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 feels more complete overall, with stronger dry braking, sharper handling and higher treadwear potential.
Dr Edwin Pang