The Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 and Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3WA are two soft all-terrain tires built for drivers who want rugged looks without ruining everyday comfort. Both promise dependable wet grip, light off-road capability and year-round usability—but which one actually rules the soft A/T category? This battle reveals whether Yokohama’s refined versatility can overcome Falken’s tougher, more aggressive character.
Table of Contents
Results: Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 vs Falken Wildpeak AT3WA
Results below were taken from the ADAC’s “2025 All Terrain Test“. A total of 8 tires were tested this time around. The graph below shows the comparison between Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 vs Falken Wildpeak AT3WA based on the relevant performance category. The Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark. Note that for subjective evaluation, we equate 1 point as 5%. Hence for example if tire A is graded 7 while tire B is graded 6, A is better than B by 5%.
As both tires are carry the 3 peak mountain logo, ADAC has included snow in its testing portfolio. The tire size of interest is 225/65R17 which is a common tire size for Honda CRV. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle is a Volkswagen Amarok.
Wet
In wet braking, the Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3WA stops in 39.7 metres, which is 4.0 metres shorter than the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 at 43.7 metres, giving the Falken a 10% advantage. The Falken also performs better in straight aquaplaning, resisting water up to 96.5 km/h compared with 94.4 km/h for the Yokohama, a difference of 2.1 km/h or 2%. Overall, the Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3WA is the stronger wet-weather tire, with its biggest advantage coming under wet braking.
Wildpeak AT AT3WA :
- +10% in wet braking
- +2% in aquaplaning
Snow
In snow braking, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 stops in 11.1 metres, which is 0.3 metres shorter than the Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3WA at 11.4 metres, giving the Yokohama a 3% advantage. However, the Falken performs better in snow traction, accelerating in 1.51 seconds compared with 1.56 seconds for the Yokohama, making it 0.05 seconds quicker or 3% better. Overall, the result is evenly matched, with Yokohama leading in snow braking and Falken delivering stronger snow traction.
Wildpeak AT AT3WA :
- -3% in Snow braking
- +3% in Snow traction
Gravel
In gravel traction, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 completes the run in 3.32 seconds, which is 0.08 seconds quicker than the Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3WA at 3.40 seconds, giving the Yokohama a 2% advantage. Overall, the Yokohama holds a small but clear edge on gravel.
Wildpeak AT AT3WA :
- -2% in Gravel traction
Dry
In dry braking, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 stops in 46.1 metres, which is 1.1 metres shorter than the Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3WA at 47.2 metres, giving the Yokohama a 2% advantage. Overall, the Yokohama delivers slightly stronger dry braking performance.
Wildpeak AT AT3WA :
- -2% in dry braking
UTQG ratings
The Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 has a UTQG treadwear rating of 600, which is 100 points higher than the Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3WA at 500. This gives the Yokohama a 20% higher treadwear rating, suggesting better potential tread longevity under standardized UTQG testing.
| Brand | Tireline | Size | Tread Wear | Traction | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yokohama | Geolandar AT G015 | All | 600 | A | B |
| Falken | Wildpeak AT AT3WA | All | 500 | A | A |
Price
For the 225/65R17 size, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 costs €108, while the Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3WA costs €113. The Falken is €5 more expensive, making it around 5% pricier than the Yokohama.
Tire size: 225/65R17
- Geolandar AT G015: € 108
- Wildpeak AT AT3WA : € 113
Difference: +5% more expensive for Wildpeak AT AT3WA
Summary
From my perspective, the Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3WA is the stronger choice for wet-road performance, with noticeably better braking and slightly better aquaplaning resistance, while also offering stronger snow traction. The Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 fights back with better snow braking, gravel traction, dry braking, a higher UTQG treadwear rating and a slightly lower price. I would choose the Falken for wet-weather confidence, but the Yokohama is the better all-round value for drivers who prioritise durability and balanced performance.
Dr Edwin Pang