Nokian Outpost AT vs Nokian One HT: The Nokian Outpost AT and Nokian One HT are two formidable players in the world of tires, each designed to excel in its own domain. The Nokian Outpost AT, an all-terrain tire, is the rugged adventurer of the pair, boasting superior traction and durability in off-road conditions. Its design is optimized to handle various terrains, from muddy trails to rocky paths, ensuring a reliable and robust performance in the great outdoors.
On the other side, the Nokian One HT shines as a highway terrain tire, masterfully crafted for the smooth and efficient highway journey. It prioritizes comfort, fuel efficiency, and long tread life, making it an ideal companion for long-distance travel and everyday commuting on paved roads.
The key differences between these two tire titans lie in their tread patterns, rubber compounds, and structural designs. The Outpost AT’s aggressive tread is meant to bite into softer, uneven surfaces, while the One HT features a more refined tread pattern that reduces road noise and enhances grip on asphalt.
The question at the heart of their battle: What truly sets these two apart in terms of performance, durability, and suitability for different driving conditions? Each has its own strengths, but choosing the right one depends on where your journey takes you.
Table of Contents
Results: Nokian Outpost AT vs Nokian One HT
Ideally, you would want a head-to-head test result to demonstrate the distinct performance differences between the two products. However, in this instance, no test results are available that compare these two products directly, due to clear segmentation. Fortunately, Consumer Report has tested both tires, allowing us to use their ratings to assess the performance of each. Please note that Consumer Report’s rating system uses a maximum score of 5, with a 5/5 rating representing the best possible achievement.
The graph above shows the comparison between Nokian Outpost AT vs Nokian One HT based on the relevant performance category. The tire size of interest for this test is a 265/70R17 which is a common tire size for Dodge Ram 1500. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information.
Wet
When comparing the wet performance of the Nokian Outpost AT and the Nokian One HT tires, it’s important to understand how they perform in terms of wet braking, wet handling, and resistance to hydroplaning.
Wet Braking: Both tires score similarly, with a rating of 2 out of 5. This means they offer moderate performance when it comes to stopping on wet surfaces. Neither tire stands out as particularly superior in this aspect.
- Outpost AT : 2/5
- One HT : 2/5
Wet Handling: The Nokian One HT edges ahead slightly with a score of 3 out of 5, compared to the Outpost AT’s rating of 2 out of 5. This suggests that the One HT offers better control and responsiveness while driving on wet roads.
- Outpost AT : 3/5
- One HT : 3/5
Hydroplaning Resistance: Both tires perform well in this category, each with a score of 4 out of 5. This indicates a high level of resistance to hydroplaning, where the tires maintain better contact and grip on the road surface even in wet conditions.
- Outpost AT: 4/5
- One HT : 4/5
In summary, while both tires demonstrate adequate wet performance, the Nokian One HT has a slight advantage in wet handling. However, both are equally resistant to hydroplaning, ensuring safer driving in wet conditions.
Dry
When evaluating the dry performance of the Nokian Outpost AT and Nokian One HT tires, it’s important to focus on how they each handle dry braking, a critical factor for driving safety and efficiency.
Dry Braking: In this category, both the Nokian Outpost AT and the Nokian One HT tire score impressively, each earning a rating of 4 out of 5. This high score indicates that both tires offer strong performance when it comes to stopping on dry surfaces. They provide reliable braking capabilities, ensuring that the vehicle comes to a stop effectively and safely when required.
- Outpost AT : 4/5
- One HT : 4/5
In essence, when it comes to dry conditions, both the Nokian Outpost AT and the Nokian One HT excel in braking performance. This means that for everyday driving or even in emergency situations, both tires are likely to perform robustly, offering peace of mind and safety on dry roads.
Snow
When comparing the snow performance of the Nokian Outpost AT and the Nokian One HT tires, the focus is on their snow traction abilities.
Snow Traction: Both the Nokian Outpost AT and the Nokian One HT tire score a robust 4 out of 5 in snow traction. This high rating indicates that both tires are well-equipped to handle snowy conditions, offering solid grip and stability on snow-covered roads. Whether navigating through light flurries or deeper snow, these tires are designed to maintain traction, reducing the risk of slipping and enhancing overall driving safety in wintry conditions.
- Outpost AT : 4/5
- One HT : 4/5
In summary, for those driving in snowy environments, both the Nokian Outpost AT and the Nokian One HT prove to be reliable choices. Their strong performance in snow traction means that they are capable of providing consistent and dependable handling in winter weather conditions.
Ice
When assessing the ice performance of the Nokian Outpost AT and Nokian One HT tires, a key factor to consider is their ice braking capability.
Ice Braking: The Nokian Outpost AT shows a slight advantage with a rating of 4 out of 5, indicating that it offers strong performance when it comes to stopping on icy surfaces. This higher score suggests that the Outpost AT is more effective in reducing stopping distances and maintaining control during braking on ice, which is crucial for safety in winter driving conditions.
- Outpost AT : 4/5
- One HT : 3/5
In contrast, the Nokian One HT scores a 3 out of 5 in ice braking. While this is still a respectable score, it indicates that the One HT, although reliable, may not perform as well as the Outpost AT in terms of braking on ice. The One HT provides adequate ice braking capabilities, but with slightly less proficiency compared to its counterpart.
In summary, both tires are competent for icy conditions, but the Nokian Outpost AT stands out with a better performance in ice braking. This makes it a slightly more preferable option for those who frequently drive in icy conditions and require enhanced safety and control during braking.
Mileage (real actual test !)
When comparing the mileage performance of the Nokian Outpost AT and Nokian One HT tires, we are looking at the actual distance these tires can travel before needing replacement.
Actual Tested Mileage: Both the Nokian Outpost AT and the Nokian One HT tire have demonstrated an impressive and identical tested mileage of 50,000 miles. This means that both tires are designed to last for the same distance, offering durability and long-term usage.
- Outpost AT: 50,000 miles
- One HT : 50,000 miles
Having the same tested mileage indicates that both the Outpost AT and the One HT are reliable choices for drivers who are looking for tires that won’t need frequent replacing. Whether you choose the all-terrain capabilities of the Outpost AT or the highway terrain efficiency of the One HT, you can expect a similar lifespan in terms of mileage.
In summary, in terms of mileage longevity, both the Nokian Outpost AT and the Nokian One HT stand on equal footing. This makes them both solid choices for drivers who value durability and want to minimize the frequency of tire replacements over the life of their vehicle..
Noise Vibration Harshness (NVH)
When comparing the NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) performance of the Nokian Outpost AT and Nokian One HT tires, it’s important to look at their ride comfort and noise levels.
Ride Comfort: The Nokian One HT scores a 3 out of 5, indicating a higher level of ride comfort compared to the Nokian Outpost AT, which scores a 2 out of 5. This suggests that the One HT provides a smoother and more comfortable ride, particularly on paved roads, by better absorbing road irregularities and reducing the impact of bumps.
- Outpost AT : 2/5
- One HT : 3/5
Noise: In terms of noise, the Nokian One HT again takes the lead with a score of 4 out of 5, compared to the 3 out of 5 for the Outpost AT. This implies that the One HT produces less noise while driving, offering a quieter and more pleasant driving experience. The lower noise level is especially beneficial for long drives, where tire noise can be a significant factor in driver fatigue.
- Outpost AT : 3/5
- One HT : 4/5
In summary, when it comes to NVH performance, the Nokian One HT tire outperforms the Nokian Outpost AT. With its higher ratings in both ride comfort and noise reduction, the One HT is the preferable choice for drivers who prioritize a smooth, comfortable, and quiet driving experience.
Rolling Resistance
When comparing the rolling resistance of the Nokian Outpost AT and Nokian One HT tires, we’re essentially evaluating how much energy is required to keep each tire rolling at a steady pace.
Rolling Resistance: The Nokian One HT takes the lead with a score of 4 out of 5, indicating that it has a lower rolling resistance compared to the Nokian Outpost AT, which scores a 3 out of 5. A lower rolling resistance means the tire requires less energy to roll, which translates to better fuel efficiency and a lighter impact on the environment.
- Outpost AT : 3/5
- One HT : 4/5
The One HT’s superior rolling resistance makes it an ideal choice for drivers looking for efficiency, especially over long distances on highways. In contrast, the Outpost AT, while still performing decently, might not be as efficient in terms of fuel usage due to its slightly higher rolling resistance.
In summary, if fuel efficiency and reducing environmental impact are key considerations for your driving needs, the Nokian One HT is the more suitable option due to its lower rolling resistance. However, the Nokian Outpost AT still offers a reasonable balance if you’re looking for a tire that performs well in other aspects.
Price
When comparing the prices of the Nokian Outpost AT and Nokian One HT tires for the size 265/70R17, we see a notable difference:.
Tire size: 265/70R17
- Outpost AT: $225
- One HT : $210
Difference: -7% more cheaper for One HT.
This price difference indicates that the One HT is approximately 7% cheaper than the Outpost AT. For buyers who are budget-conscious, this price difference can be a significant factor in their decision-making process, especially when purchasing a full set of tires. The One HT offers a more economical option, providing good value without compromising on quality and performance. However, for those who prioritize specific features and performance of the Outpost AT, the higher price may be justified.
Summary
As a tire expert, my analysis of the Nokian Outpost AT and Nokian One HT tires reveals that both have their distinct advantages and disadvantages, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific requirements.
The Nokian Outpost AT, with its all-terrain design, is a tire built for versatility and resilience in various off-road conditions. Its key strengths include superior traction on rough and uneven terrains, a high resistance to hydroplaning, and commendable performance in snow. However, its ride comfort and noise level are slightly less favorable compared to the One HT, and its rolling resistance is marginally higher, which might impact fuel efficiency.
On the other hand, the Nokian One HT, designed for highway terrain, excels in providing a smoother, more comfortable ride with lower noise levels. It also offers better handling in wet conditions and has lower rolling resistance, making it more fuel-efficient. While it performs adequately in snow and ice, its all-terrain capabilities are not as robust as the Outpost AT.
In conclusion, the choice between these two tires depends on your driving environment and priorities. If your journeys often take you off the beaten path or into varied terrains, the Nokian Outpost AT is your go-to tire. However, if you primarily drive on highways and prioritize comfort, noise reduction, and fuel efficiency, the Nokian One HT would be the ideal choice. Remember, the best tire is the one that aligns with your individual driving needs and conditions.
Dr Edwin Pang