There is no question that Michelin is the world’s leading technology leader in the tire industry. They spend a whopping 687 million euros in 2019 on research and development, the 2nd highest after Bridgestone.
XM2+ is a rubber compound upgrade of XM2. Even though the pattern is the same, Michelin still managed to improve its wet braking and mileage. As Michelin often disclose how well they are doing in comparison with other competitors, you will be able to judge yourself whether this tire is worth your money.
Should I buy it?
1. Wet braking
-According to Michelin website, MICHELIN Energy XM2+ Tyres brakes 1.5m shorter when new and 2.6m shorter when worn vs other premium tyre brands. So with a typical braking distance of around 35m when you deaccelerate from 80km/h to 0km/h. XM2+ is at least 4% better than the competition.
2. Mileage
-XM2+ made a bold claim stating that their tire lasts 25%* longer compared to other premium tyre brands.
* Longevity test conducted by China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co.,Ltd (CATARC) (an independent 3rd party), on Michelin’s request, in September 2018 in TianJin, China, on dimension 205/55 R16 91V on Volkswagen GOLF7 comparing MICHELIN Energy XM2+ versus Premium Competitors (figures represent the average of 5 other premium brands). Longevity test run in average real usage with 20,000 km run and estimated longevity at the depth of Tread Wear Indicator
3. Price and size availability.
The XM2+ covers sizes ranging from 13 inch all the way to 16″. So this tire line is serving the comfort segment. As the technology leader, Michelin charges the absolute premium for its tire. Comparing a 205/55R16 price against Bridgestone’s Ecopia 300, XM2+ is almost 40% more expensive
Name | Tire Size | Price(RM) |
---|---|---|
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 175/65R14 | 220 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 185/60R14 | 250 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 185/65R14 | 277 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 185/70R14 | 280 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 195/60R14 | 304 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 195/70R14 | 360 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 175/65R15 | 260 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 185/55R15 | 280 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 185/60R15 | 245 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 185/65R15 | 266 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 195/55R15 | 260 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 195/60R15 | 305 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 195/65R15 | 308 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 205/60R15 | 358 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 205/65R15 | 367 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 205/70R15 | 326 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 185/55R16 | 285 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 195/50R16 | 357 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 215/65R15 | 422 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 205/55R16 | 388 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 195/60R16 | 420 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 205/60R16 | 420 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 215/60R16 | 430 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 205/65R16 | 385 |
Michelin Energy XM2+ | 215/65R16 | 495 |
Summary
If you decide to purchase a XM2+ , you will have the best wet braking and mileage tire in the market. Possible drawbacks might be higher fuel consumption and a much higher cost but as the saying goes “you get what you pay for” which is a top class tire
Evolution of Michelin's comfort tire line - Top Tire Review
Sunday 24th of January 2021
[…] XM2+ (2019) […]
Best premium tire for A & B segment cars- 2021. - Top Tire Review
Saturday 23rd of January 2021
[…] 1. Michelin XM2+ […]
Continental comfort 6 CC6 (2016) - Top Tire Review
Friday 22nd of January 2021
[…] competitors . Relying on competitors info, wee know from this article that CC6 was tested against Michelin XM2+ in one of the press event. CC6 together with other competitors were at least 15% worse in wet […]
Goodyear Assurance TripleMax 2 (2018) - Top Tire Review
Thursday 21st of January 2021
[…] -In it’s brochure, Goodyear claimed that….. Assurance Triplemax 2 has a shorter wet braking distance as compared to 4 leading competitors* (which needed an additional 5.65m, 2.8m, 1.85m 6 1.45m) under test conditions (from 80 km/h to 1 km/h, with stopping distances derived using test deceleration data). At that time Michelin XM2+ was not out yet. I would expect the TripleMax 2 to be just slightly worse than XM2+ due to the testing arrangement. […]