Michelin X Ice Snow vs Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2: When it comes to gearing up for winter, choosing the right snow tires for your SUV can make all the difference. In the snowy tire segment, two major contenders stand out: the Michelin X Ice Snow and the Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2. The Michelin X Ice Snow is a versatile warrior, designed to serve the entire range from passenger cars to SUVs, offering broad applicability and consistent performance. On the other hand, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2 is a specialized gladiator, a dedicated SUV snow tire, engineered specifically for the unique demands of larger, heavier vehicles in wintry conditions.
This sets the stage for an epic battle in the snow SUV tire segment. Each tire brings its unique strengths to the icy roads. The Michelin X Ice Snow promises adaptability and all-round excellence, while the Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2 offers specialized prowess for your SUV in harsh winter conditions.
So, if you’re in the market for your next set of snow SUV tires, which champion would you choose? Will it be the versatile Michelin X Ice Snow or the SUV-dedicated Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2? The icy roads await your decision. Let the battle in the snow SUV tire segment commence!
Table of Contents
Results: Michelin X Ice Snow vs Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2
Ideally you would like to have a 1 v 1 test results to show its clear performance difference. However this time around as there is clear segmentation, there are no test results which ran these 2 products simultaneously. Lucky for us, consumer report has tested both tires separately and we would be able to use their ratings to judge how well both tires fared. Do note that the consumer report uses a maximum rating of 5 which means that a rating of 5/5 is the best possible achievement.
The graph above shows the comparison between Michelin X Ice Snow vs Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2 based on the relevant performance category. The tire size of interest for this test is a 215/55R17 which is a common tire size for Honda HR-V.
Ice
When comparing the ice performance of the Michelin X Ice Snow and the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 tires, it’s important to focus on their ice braking capabilities, which is a critical aspect for winter driving safety.
Both the Michelin X Ice Snow and the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 score impressively in ice braking tests. They each have a rating of 5 out of 5, indicating top-notch performance in this area. This rating reflects their ability to bring a vehicle to a stop on ice, a crucial feature for safe winter driving. Specifically, these tests often involve measuring the distance required to come to a complete stop from 10 mph on a skating rink, simulating extreme icy conditions.
Ice Braking :
- X Ice Snow : 5/5
- DM V2 : 5/5
Snow
In evaluating the snow performance of the Michelin X Ice Snow and the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 tires, the focus is on their snow traction capabilities. This is an important factor for safe and effective driving in snowy conditions.
Both tires, the Michelin X Ice Snow and the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2, have achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in snow traction. This score is based on their ability to accelerate on snow-covered surfaces, a key indicator of traction in winter conditions. Specifically, the tests often involve measuring the time taken to accelerate from 5 mph to 20 mph on snow, which simulates a common driving scenario during winter.
Snow Traction :
- X Ice Snow : 5/5
- DM V2 : 5/5
Wet
When comparing the wet performance of the Michelin X Ice Snow and Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 tires, we can assess them based on three key aspects: wet braking, handling in wet conditions, and resistance to hydroplaning.
For wet braking, which refers to the tire’s ability to stop efficiently on wet surfaces, both tires have relatively low scores. The Michelin X Ice Snow and the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 each score a 2 out of 5 in this category. This rating is based on their performance in braking from 60 mph to a complete stop on wet pavement, indicating that they may not be the strongest performers in wet braking.
Wet Braking:
- X Ice Snow : 2/5
- DM V2 : 3/5
In terms of wet handling in wet conditions, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 fares slightly better with a score of 3 out of 5, compared to the Michelin X Ice Snow’s score of 2 out of 5. This suggests that the Bridgestone tire provides somewhat better control and responsiveness when driving on wet roads.
Handling (Wet) :
- X Ice Snow : 2/5
- DM V2 : 3/5
Lastly, regarding hydroplaning resistance, which measures the tire’s ability to maintain contact with the road surface in wet conditions, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 again scores higher with a 4 out of 5, compared to the Michelin X Ice Snow’s score of 3 out of 5. This indicates that the Bridgestone tire is more effective in preventing hydroplaning in wet conditions.
Hydroplaning :
- X Ice Snow : 3/5
- DM V2 : 4/5
Overall, while both tires show similar capabilities in wet braking, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 demonstrates slightly better performance in handling and significantly better performance in hydroplaning resistance compared to the Michelin X Ice Snow in wet conditions.
Dry
In comparing the dry performance of the Michelin X Ice Snow and Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 tires, we specifically look at their dry braking capabilities. Dry braking is an important measure of how effectively a tire can stop a vehicle on dry surfaces.
The Michelin X Ice Snow scores a 3 out of 5 in dry braking. This indicates a moderate level of performance when it comes to stopping the vehicle from 60 mph to 0 on a dry surface. While this performance is acceptable, it suggests there might be room for improvement in terms of stopping distance under dry conditions.
In contrast, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 performs better in this aspect, scoring a 4 out of 5 in dry braking. This higher score reflects a stronger capability in bringing a vehicle to a stop from 60 mph in dry conditions. It suggests that the Bridgestone tire has a shorter stopping distance and more effective braking on dry roads compared to the Michelin tire.
Dry Braking :
- X Ice Snow : 3/5
- DM V2 : 4/5
Noise Vibration Harshness (NVH)
When comparing the NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) performances of the Michelin X Ice Snow and Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 tires, two key factors come into play: ride comfort and noise levels.
Starting with ride comfort, which assesses how smoothly the tires absorb road irregularities and vibrations, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores higher with a 4 out of 5. This suggests that it offers a more comfortable ride, with better absorption of bumps and less transmission of road harshness to the cabin. In contrast, the Michelin X Ice Snow scores a 3 out of 5 in ride comfort, indicating a slightly less smooth experience.
Ride Comfort :
- X Ice Snow : 3/5
- DM V2 : 4/5
In terms of noise, which measures the sound level produced by the tires while driving, the roles are reversed. The Michelin X Ice Snow scores better with a 4 out of 5, suggesting it is relatively quieter and produces less road noise. This can contribute to a more pleasant driving experience, especially on long journeys. On the other hand, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores a 3 out of 5 for noise, indicating it might be slightly noisier compared to the Michelin tire.
Noise :
- X Ice Snow : 4/5
- DM V2 : 3/5
In conclusion, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 offers superior ride comfort, providing a smoother experience over various road surfaces, while the Michelin X Ice Snow has the advantage in producing less noise, contributing to a quieter cabin environment. Each tire has its strengths in different aspects of NVH performance.
Rolling Resistance
When evaluating the rolling resistance of the Michelin X Ice Snow and Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 tires, it’s crucial to understand how this factor impacts vehicle performance, particularly for electric vehicles (EVs).
Rolling resistance is a measure of the energy that a tire consumes while rolling under a load. Lower rolling resistance means the tire requires less energy to move, which can lead to improved fuel efficiency in traditional vehicles and extended battery range in electric vehicles. This is especially significant for EVs, as reduced rolling resistance directly translates to more miles per charge, making it a key consideration for EV owners.
In terms of performance, the Michelin X Ice Snow scores a 4 out of 5 in rolling resistance, indicating it is relatively efficient and requires less energy to move. This efficiency can contribute to better fuel economy in conventional vehicles and a longer range on a single charge for electric vehicles. Conversely, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 has a slightly lower score of 3 out of 5 in rolling resistance. This suggests that it may consume more energy while rolling compared to the Michelin tire, potentially leading to a slight reduction in fuel efficiency or EV battery range.
Rolling Resistance :
- X Ice Snow : 4/5
- DM V2 : 3/5
Price
When comparing the prices of the Michelin X Ice Snow and Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2 tires, specifically for the size 225/60R17, there is a noticeable difference.
Tire size: 225/60R17
X Ice Snow : $201
Blizzak DM V2 : $157
Difference: -28% more cheaper for DM V2.
The Michelin X Ice Snow is priced at $201 per tire. In contrast, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2 comes in at a lower price of $157 per tire. This means that the Blizzak DM V2 is about 28% cheaper than the X Ice Snow. The significant price difference makes the Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2 a more budget-friendly option for those seeking winter tires in this specific size.
Summary
As a tire expert, after thoroughly comparing the Michelin X Ice Snow and Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2, I can confidently say that both tires have their clear strengths, and the ideal choice really depends on your specific requirements.
If your priorities include better performance in wet conditions, superior hydroplaning resistance, more effective dry braking, and enhanced ride comfort, then the Bridgestone Blizzak DM V2 is an excellent choice. Its slightly better handling in wet conditions and better comfort can make a noticeable difference, especially in regions with mixed winter weather conditions.
On the other hand, if you’re driving an electric vehicle and are particularly concerned about rolling resistance and cabin noise, the Michelin X Ice Snow stands out as the better option. Its lower rolling resistance can help maximize your EV’s range, which is a crucial consideration for electric vehicle owners. Additionally, its quieter performance can significantly enhance the driving experience, particularly in EVs where engine noise is not a factor.
In conclusion, both tires offer outstanding winter performance, but the best choice depends on what aspects of tire performance are most important to you. Whether it’s the wet and dry handling and comfort of the Blizzak DM V2 or the efficiency and quietness of the X Ice Snow, your specific driving needs and vehicle type should guide your decision.
Dr Edwin Pang