Skip to Content

Michelin Primacy SUV+ vs Bridgestone Alenza 001

Michelin Primacy SUV+ vs Bridgestone Alenza 001

Michelin Primacy SUV+ vs Bridgestone Alenza 001: In the heated battleground of the summer SUV tire segment, a thrilling clash emerges between two giants: the Michelin Primacy SUV+ and the Bridgestone Alenza 001. This face-off is more than just a tire comparison; it’s a showdown showcasing the pinnacle of technology, durability, and performance that these industry behemoths bring to the table.

Each contender brings its unique strengths to the fore, promising to elevate your driving experience to new heights. The Michelin Primacy SUV+ promises unparalleled comfort and safety, while the Bridgestone Alenza 001 is all about enhancing performance and grip, even in the most challenging conditions. Get ready for a battle that will redefine the standards of summer driving for SUV enthusiasts!

Results: Michelin Primacy SUV+ vs Bridgestone Alenza 001

Results below were taken from 2022 AutoLab SUV Tire Test with a total of 2 tires tested, The graph below shows the comparison between Michelin Primacy SUV+ vs Bridgestone Alenza 001 based on the relevant performance category. Michelin Primacy SUV+ was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.

The tire size of interest is a 235/55R18 which is a common tire size for Audi Q3 & Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle is a Mercedes-Benz GLA which is a relatively popular SUV car.

Testing Vehicle of Choice: Mercedes-Benz GLA
Testing Vehicle of Choice: Mercedes-Benz GLA

Dry

When it comes to dry braking performance, the Michelin Primacy SUV+ edges out the Bridgestone Alenza 001 with a slight advantage, stopping from 100km/h to 0 in 41.59 meters, compared to the 41.89 meters required by the Bridgestone. This small but crucial difference of 0.3 meters could be the margin between safety and a close call in real-world driving conditions.

On the other hand, in terms of lateral acceleration, both tires perform identically, each achieving 1.085G. This means that when navigating through tight turns or making swift lane changes on dry roads, both the Michelin Primacy SUV+ and the Bridgestone Alenza 001 offer the same level of grip and stability, ensuring a confident and secure driving experience.

Alenza 001 :

  • -1% in dry braking
  • 0% in dry lateral acceleration

Noise Vibration Harshness (NVH)

When it comes to NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) performance, the Michelin Primacy SUV+ significantly outshines the Bridgestone Alenza 001, especially in the aspect of interior noise. At speeds of 40 km/h, 60 km/h, and 80 km/h, the Michelin Primacy SUV+ maintains lower interior noise levels at 46.4 dB, 50.8 dB, and 52.4 dB respectively.

In stark contrast, the Bridgestone Alenza 001 records higher noise levels of 52.3 dB, 54.8 dB, and 56.2 dB at the same speeds, highlighting a clear and substantial difference in favor of the Michelin tire. The most notable gap is at 40 km/h, where the Michelin tire is almost 6 dB quieter than the Bridgestone, a difference that is not just measurable but also audibly significant to the driver and passengers.

Furthermore, when comparing vibration levels, the Michelin Primacy SUV+ again shows superior performance with a measurement of 4.1 m/s², slightly lower than the 4.36 m/s² observed for the Bridgestone Alenza 001. Although closer in this regard, the overall NVH performance clearly favors the Michelin Primacy SUV+, promising a quieter and smoother ride.

Alenza 001 :

  • -11% in interior noise @ 40 km/h (+5.9 dB)
  • -7% in interior noise @ 60 km/h (+4 dB)
  • -7% in interior noise @ 80 km/h (+3.8 dB)
  • -6% in vibration

Rolling Resistance

In the arena of rolling resistance, a key factor influencing fuel efficiency and energy conservation, the Michelin Primacy SUV+ demonstrates a slight but impactful advantage over the Bridgestone Alenza 001. When comparing the distance covered from a speed of 35km/h to a complete stop, the Michelin Primacy SUV+ rolls out to 483.26 meters, whereas the Bridgestone Alenza 001 extends slightly further to 493.74 meters.

This difference of 10.48 meters indicates that the Michelin tire has lower rolling resistance, making it a bit more efficient in terms of energy usage and potentially contributing to slightly better fuel economy. Lower rolling resistance means the tire faces less friction when in motion, translating to less energy required to maintain or change speeds, showcasing the Michelin Primacy SUV+’s slight edge in this performance aspect.

Alenza 001 :

  • -2% in rolling resistance

Price

When it comes to choosing between the Michelin Primacy SUV+ and the Bridgestone Alenza 001 for your 235/55R18 tire needs, there’s a significant price consideration to keep in mind. The Michelin Primacy SUV+ is priced at RM 869, positioning it at a premium compared to the Bridgestone Alenza 001, which is available at RM 596.

This makes the Alenza 001 an enticing option, being approximately 46% cheaper than its Michelin counterpart. Such a substantial price difference underscores the Alenza 001 as a value proposition for budget-conscious buyers without compromising on quality. For a closer look at these tires and more, be sure to check out my tire shop in the Klang Valley for great deals and professional advice tailored to your needs.

Tire size: 235/55R18

Difference: -46% more cheaper for Alenza 001.

Summary

As a tire expert who has delved deep into the nuances of tire performance, it’s clear that the Michelin Primacy SUV+ emerges as the victor in this comprehensive comparison against the Bridgestone Alenza 001. When examining the metrics that matter most to SUV drivers—dry braking, lateral acceleration, NVH (Noise, Vibration, Harshness) performance, and rolling resistance—the Michelin Primacy SUV+ consistently demonstrates superior or equal capabilities. Particularly notable is its significant advantage in NVH performance, offering a noticeably quieter and more comfortable ride, which, combined with its slightly better efficiency in rolling resistance, underscores its appeal for those prioritizing comfort and fuel economy.

Dr Edwin Pang

The price differential, with the Alenza 001 being approximately 46% cheaper, does present a compelling case for budget-conscious consumers. However, the premium for the Michelin Primacy SUV+ is justified by its enhanced performance characteristics and the promise of a more refined driving experience.

It’s important to note that this comparison did not cover wet performance, a critical aspect for comprehensive tire evaluation. The wet performance could potentially alter the dynamics of this comparison, but based on the parameters assessed, the Michelin Primacy SUV+ stands out as the preferred choice for those seeking a blend of safety, comfort, and performance in dry conditions.


Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]