Michelin Energy XM2+ vs Continental ComfortContact CC7: In the thrilling match-up of automotive tires, the Michelin Energy XM2+ faces off against the Continental ComfortContact CC7, Continental’s latest innovation in 2023. The ComfortContact CC7, succeeding the CC6, showcases substantial improvements for an enhanced driving experience: smoother drives, quieter rides, and longer tire life.
Noteworthy are the CC7’s advancements over the CC6: 7% better in wet braking, 5% in both handling and dry braking, while maintaining its leading position in noise and comfort. Additionally, it achieves a 2% improvement in rolling resistance, signaling better fuel efficiency and a nod towards environmental sustainability. As we gear up for this clash between the Michelin Energy XM2+ and the Continental ComfortContact CC7, it boils down to your specific needs and preferences. Which will emerge as your tire of choice?
Table of Contents
Results: Michelin Energy XM2+ vs Continental ComfortContact CC7
Unfortunately, there hasn’t been a direct tire test comparing the Michelin Energy XM2+ and the Continental ComfortContact CC7. However, we can still compare their performance using the EU tire label information, available through the Korean label system. This approach allows us to evaluate and contrast their features based on standardized criteria.
Both the Michelin Energy XM2+ and the Continental ComfortContact CC7 are designed for the comfort segment, catering to a broad range of vehicles. They are ideal choices for popular models such as the Perodua Myvi, Axia, and Bezza, serving a significant portion of the automotive market. Additionally, these tires are suitable for other widely used cars, ensuring a smooth and quiet ride across various driving conditions.
Wet
When comparing the wet performance of the Michelin Energy XM2+ and the Continental ComfortContact CC7, the difference in their EU tire label ratings offers a clear insight. The Michelin Energy XM2+ holds a B rating, while the Continental ComfortContact CC7 is rated C for wet braking. This distinction implies that the Michelin tire may perform better in wet conditions, potentially offering up to a 1-meter shorter braking distance from 80 to 5 km/h than the Continental tire. Such a difference highlights the Michelin Energy XM2+’s superior capability in handling wet roads, providing a crucial advantage in safety and performance.
EU label Wet Braking:
- Michelin Energy XM2+ : B
- Continental ComfortContact CC7 : C
Rolling Resistance
When it comes to rolling resistance, which is a measure of how much energy is lost as a tire rolls down the road, both the Michelin Energy XM2+ and the Continental ComfortContact CC7 have the same EU tire label rating of D. This indicates that both tires have similar levels of rolling resistance, meaning they should offer comparable fuel efficiency and environmental impact. Neither tire has a distinct advantage over the other in this aspect, suggesting that your choice between the two might be influenced more by other performance criteria or personal preferences.
EU label Rolling Resistance:
- Michelin Energy XM2+ : D
- Continental ComfortContact CC7 : D
Mileage
In evaluating the UTQG (Uniform Tire Quality Grading) Tread Wear ratings between the Michelin Energy XM2+ and the Continental ComfortContact CC7, we see a slight difference that might affect their longevity and performance. The Michelin Energy XM2+ has a UTQG rating of 420, while the Continental ComfortContact CC7 is slightly lower at 400. This indicates that the Michelin tire is expected to have around a 5% better performance in terms of tread wear compared to the Continental tire. Essentially, this means the Michelin Energy XM2+ might last longer and provide better value over time, given its marginally higher resistance to wear under similar conditions.
UTQG Tread Wear:
- Michelin Energy XM2+ : 420
- Continental ComfortContact CC7 : 400
Price
When comparing the prices for the tire size 175/65 R14, there is a noticeable difference between the Michelin Energy XM2+ and the Continental ComfortContact CC7. The Michelin Energy XM2+ is priced at RM 220, while the Continental ComfortContact CC7 is more affordable at RM 178. This makes the Continental tire about 24% cheaper than the Michelin tire. The lower price of the Continental ComfortContact CC7 may make it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers looking for a reliable tire without compromising on the essential qualities of comfort and performance.
Tire size: 175/65 R14
- Michelin Energy XM2+: RM 220
- Continental ComfortContact CC7: RM 178
Difference: -24% more cheaper for Continental ComfortContact CC7.
Summary
As a tire expert, after carefully reviewing the objective measurements and performances between the Michelin Energy XM2+ and the Continental ComfortContact CC7, I conclude that the Michelin Energy XM2+ emerges as the winner in this duel. The primary reasons for this decision lie in the Michelin’s superior wet performance and its slightly better tread wear rating.
The Michelin Energy XM2+ has a higher EU tire label rating for wet braking (B) compared to the Continental ComfortContact CC7 (C), indicating a potentially shorter stopping distance in wet conditions. This difference is crucial for safety, especially in rainy or slippery driving conditions. Additionally, the Michelin tire’s UTQG Tread Wear rating of 420, compared to Continental’s 400, suggests a longer lifespan and better durability, offering around a 5% better performance in terms of tread wear. This implies that the Michelin Energy XM2+ could provide a more cost-effective solution over time, despite its higher initial purchase price.
Dr Edwin Pang
While both tires share the same rating for rolling resistance, indicating similar levels of fuel efficiency and environmental impact, the distinctions in wet braking and tread wear are significant factors for consideration.
The price difference, with the Continental ComfortContact CC7 being 24% cheaper, might make it an appealing option for those on a tight budget. However, considering the safety and longevity aspects, the Michelin Energy XM2+ stands out as the preferable choice for those prioritizing overall performance and value over the lifespan of their tires.
In conclusion, based on the objective measures, the Michelin Energy XM2+ wins this comparison. It’s important for buyers to weigh these factors according to their specific needs, driving conditions, and budget.