Hankook iON evo SUV vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco: When it comes to purchasing products, the appeal of affordable options from China is undeniable. But how do these products perform, especially in specialized categories like electric vehicle (EV) tires? In this introduction, we’ll delve into the performance of EV-specific tires by comparing two models: the Hankook iON evo SUV and the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco. Let’s break down and explore the real-world implications of choosing between these tires for your electric vehicle.
Table of Contents
Results: Hankook iON evo SUV vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
Results below were taken from 2024 Auto Bild EV Summer tire test with a total of 9 tires tested, The graph below shows the comparison between Hankook iON evo SUV vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco based on the relevant performance category. The Hankook iON evo SUV was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
Note that for both wet & dry handling evaluation, the average lap speed was used instead of the standard lap time & subjective rating. The tire size of interest is 235/35 R19 which is a common tire size for Audi R8 & Volkswagen Golf R. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle is a KIA EV6 which is an compact electric powered crossover SUV.
Battery Range
When considering electric vehicle (EV) tires, the battery range is a crucial factor because it directly influences how far an EV can travel on a single charge. The Hankook iON evo SUV and Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco tires present notable differences in their performance that could impact the battery range of an EV.
First, looking at rolling resistance, which affects how much energy an EV needs to keep moving, the Hankook iON evo SUV shows a lower rolling resistance at 6.88 N/kN compared to the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco’s 7.71 N/kN. Lower rolling resistance means the tire opposes less motion, leading to reduced energy use by the vehicle. This difference suggests that the Hankook tire could potentially offer better battery efficiency.
In terms of energy consumption, the Hankook iON evo SUV also performs better, with a rate of 18.83 kWh per 100 km. In comparison, the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco consumes more energy, at 19.88 kWh per 100 km. This higher energy consumption indicates that the Goodride tire could reduce the EV’s overall travel range per charge.
Together, these factors show that the Hankook iON evo SUV might be a better choice for EV drivers who prioritize extending their vehicle’s range and making the most out of every charge. The lower rolling resistance and energy consumption of the Hankook tire could translate into longer distances traveled on a single battery charge, which is a top priority for EV tire performance.
Z 107 ZuperEco:
- -11% in rolling resistance
- -5% in energy Consumption
Wet
In wet conditions, the performance of electric vehicle (EV) tires is vital for safety and handling. Comparing the Hankook iON evo SUV and the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco, we see differences in their abilities to handle wet roads.
For wet braking, which measures the stopping distance from 100 to 0 km/h, the Hankook iON evo SUV takes 39.4 meters to stop, whereas the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco takes longer, with a stopping distance of 48.1 meters. This 8.7 meters difference is significant, indicating that the Hankook tire provides better stopping power in wet conditions, which could be crucial in preventing accidents.
When it comes to wet handling, which is the ability to maintain control and speed through a wet course, the Hankook iON evo SUV also outperforms with an average speed of 57.1 km/h, compared to 54.3 km/h for the Goodride tire. This higher speed suggests that the Hankook tire maintains better grip and control in wet conditions.
In the wet circle test, which measures the time to complete a circle on a wet track, the Hankook tire completes the circle in 13.11 seconds, faster than the Goodride tire’s 13.95 seconds. This faster time indicates better lateral stability and grip of the Hankook tire on wet surfaces.
However, in the straight aquaplaning test, which assesses the tire’s ability to maintain control when driving over water, both tires perform similarly. The Hankook has a slipping speed of 94.4 km/h, while the Goodride slightly surpasses it at 94.7 km/h, suggesting comparable performance in this specific aspect of wet safety.
Overall, the Hankook iON evo SUV consistently shows superior performance in key wet condition tests, offering better safety and control compared to the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco, with the exception of straight aquaplaning where both tires show similar capabilities.
Z 107 ZuperEco:
- -18% in wet braking
- -5% in wet handling (average speed)
- -6% in wet circle
- ~0% in straight aquaplaning
Mileage
When evaluating tire longevity, especially for electric vehicles (EVs), the wear rate is critical. Comparing the Hankook iON evo SUV with the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco, there’s a clear difference in durability. The Hankook tire lasts significantly longer, covering 35,695 kilometers before substantial wear, whereas the Goodride tire wears out after 27,155 kilometers—a notable 8,540 kilometers less.
This increased durability of the Hankook tire means fewer replacements, which can translate to cost savings and convenience over the vehicle’s lifetime. Additionally, the longer-lasting tire benefits the environment by reducing waste and resource use in tire manufacturing and disposal. Therefore, for EV owners who value tire longevity and overall cost-effectiveness, the Hankook iON evo SUV presents a more durable and economically advantageous option.
Z 107 ZuperEco:
- -24% in mileage
Dry
In dry conditions, the Hankook iON evo SUV outperforms the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco, providing enhanced safety and efficiency. It stops from 100 km/h at 33 meters, 4.2 meters shorter than the Goodride, and maintains higher control with an average speed of 70.2 km/h compared to 67.1 km/h. These metrics demonstrate the Hankook’s superior grip and stability, making it the preferred choice for optimal driving performance in dry conditions.
Z 107 ZuperEco:
- -11% in dry braking
- -4% in dry handling (average speed)
Noise
The Hankook iON evo SUV is quieter than the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco, emitting 68.6 decibels (dB) compared to 70.5 dB. This 1.9 dB difference enhances driving comfort by reducing interior and environmental noise. The lower noise level of the Hankook tire is especially beneficial in urban areas, improving the overall driving experience.
Z 107 ZuperEco:
- -3% in exterior noise (+1.9 dB)
Price
In the comparison of tire prices between the Hankook iON evo SUV and the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco, there’s a stark difference that highlights the cost-effectiveness of Chinese brands like Goodride. The Hankook tire is priced at €167, whereas the Goodride tire is significantly cheaper at €58. This makes the Goodride tire about 188% less expensive than the Hankook tire.
This considerable price gap showcases the strength of budget pricing typically associated with Chinese brands. Such affordability makes the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco an attractive option for consumers seeking cost savings. Despite differences in performance metrics, the economic advantage offered by Goodride can be a compelling factor for buyers who prioritize budget over specific performance features. This affordability can make a substantial difference, especially for consumers needing to manage upfront costs while still obtaining a functional tire for their vehicle.
Tire size: 235/35 R19
Difference: -188% more cheaper for Z 107 ZuperEco.
Summary
As a tire expert analyzing the Hankook iON evo SUV and the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco, I recommend the Hankook for its superior performance. Despite a higher price, its advantages in wet and dry braking, handling, and durability offer better long-term value. The Hankook provides shorter stopping distances, improving safety, and its lower noise enhances comfort. While the Goodride is more affordable, its performance and safety compromises do not match the overall benefits of the Hankook. For reliability and performance, the Hankook iON evo SUV is the clear choice.
Dr Edwin Pang