Michelin e.Primacy vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 –EV summer vs All-Season ! On one side, the e.Primacy: a dedicated summer tire built for EV efficiency. On the other, the CrossClimate 2: the undisputed king of all-season performance. We know summer tires should win in warm weather—but the real question is: by how much does the e.Primacy outperform the CrossClimate 2 when the sun is out? Let’s find out.
Table of Contents
Results: Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
The results featured here are from the 2025 Teknikens Varld Summer Tire Test, with 8 tires tested. The accompanying graph presents a side-by-side comparison of the Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 across various performance categories, with the Michelin e.Primacy serving as the benchmark at the 100% mark. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 tested here is the OE Volvo spec.
The tire size of interest is the 235/55R19 tire size, a popular choice for vehicles like the Hyundai Santa Fe and Kia Sorento. For further insights into various tire sizes, feel free to consult our latest tire size table. The tests were conducted using a standard Volvo XC60 as the test vehicle.
Wet
In wet braking, the Michelin e.Primacy stopped 2.24 meters earlier than the CrossClimate 2, giving it an 8% advantage. During wet handling, the e.Primacy completed the lap 1.39 seconds faster, which is a 3% improvement in pace. However, in straight-line aquaplaning, the CrossClimate 2 maintained grip at 2.6 km/h higher speed, outperforming the e.Primacy by 4%.
Overall, the Michelin e.Primacy clearly excels in braking and cornering on wet surfaces, while the CrossClimate 2 fights back with better resistance to aquaplaning.
CrossClimate 2 :
- -8% in wet braking
- -3% in wet handling
- +4% in straight aquaplaning
Dry
In dry braking, the Michelin e.Primacy stopped 1.05 meters shorter than the CrossClimate 2, giving it a 4% advantage. This reinforces the e.Primacy’s strength as a summer tire, consistently outperforming the CrossClimate 2 in both wet and dry braking when temperatures rise.
CrossClimate 2 :
- -4% in dry braking
Comfort
In subjective comfort, the Michelin e.Primacy scored 10 out of 10, while the CrossClimate 2 scored 8—giving the e.Primacy a 2-point lead or a 10% improvement in ride quality. For subjective stability, the e.Primacy scored 9 versus 6 for the CrossClimate 2, resulting in a 3-point advantage or 15% better performance.
These results highlight the e.Primacy’s superior refinement and stability, making it the more composed and comfortable choice in summer driving conditions.
CrossClimate 2 :
- -10% in subjective comfort
- -15% in subjective stability
Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption is typically measured in liters per 100 kilometers, but in this case, only a normalized score was provided. The Michelin e.Primacy scored 10, while the CrossClimate 2 scored 8, giving the e.Primacy a 2-point or 10% advantage. This reflects its lower rolling resistance and better efficiency—especially important for EV drivers looking to maximize range.
CrossClimate 2 :
- -10% in fuel consumption (objective normalized)
Price
For tire size 235/55 R19, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is priced at €191, while the e.Primacy costs €179—making the CrossClimate 2 7% more expensive.
Tire size: 235/55 R19
- e.Primacy : € 179
- CrossClimate 2 : € 191
Difference: +7% more expensive for CrossClimate 2
Summary
As a tire expert, it’s no surprise the CrossClimate 2 performs slightly worse in this summer-focused test—it’s built for year-round versatility, including snow, which naturally compromises its warm-weather edge. In contrast, the e.Primacy delivers better wet and dry grip, smoother comfort, greater stability, and improved efficiency. While the CrossClimate 2 remains the go-to for all-season adaptability, the e.Primacy clearly excels when summer performance and EV range are the priorities.
Dr Edwin Pang