Michelin Defender 2 vs. CrossClimate 2: The Epic Duel of Tires –> Step into the arena where rubber meets the road, and witness the face-off between two of Michelin’s finest: the Defender 2 and the CrossClimate 2. On one side, we have the Defender 2, a paradigm of endurance and longevity. Crafted meticulously for those who prioritize mileage, this standard all-season tire promises countless miles of smooth, worry-free journeys.
On the other side, the CrossClimate 2 stands tall, boasting the prestigious 3 Peak Mountain Snowflake certification. Not just any tire earns this badge. It’s an emblem of versatility, signaling that the tire is designed to conquer all weather conditions – be it the blazing heat of summer or the biting chill of winter.
Both champions in their own right, but with distinct specialties. The Defender 2 promises long-lasting performance while the CrossClimate 2 swears by its adaptability. As we pit mileage against all-weather prowess, it’s time to see which tire emerges victorious in this epic duel! Stay tuned, and may the best tread win.
Table of Contents
Results : Michelin Defender 2 vs CrossClimate 2
Ideally, you would want a head-to-head test result to demonstrate the distinct performance differences between the two products. However, in this instance, no test results are available that compare these two products directly. Fortunately, Discount Tire has tested both tires, allowing us to use their data-tested results to assess the performance of each tire. The graph below shows the comparison between Michelin Defender 2 vs CrossClimate 2 based on the relevant performance category.
Wet
Michelin Defender 2 vs. CrossClimate 2: Wet Braking Showdown
When it comes to road safety, wet braking performance is a crucial consideration, and here we present the results for two of Michelin’s iconic tires: the Defender 2 and the CrossClimate 2.
In the tests, the Michelin Defender 2 recorded a wet braking distance of 156 feet. Given its design emphasis on being a highly mileage-focused tire, this result doesn’t come as a surprise. Tires that prioritize mileage often make certain compromises, and in this case, it seems the Defender 2’s prowess in long-distance endurance might come at the expense of optimal wet braking performance.
Wet Braking :
- Defender 2 : 100%
- CrossClimate 2 : 116%
On the other hand, the Michelin CrossClimate 2, true to its all-weather versatility, showcased a commendable wet braking distance of 135 feet. The shorter distance indicates a more prompt response in wet conditions, offering drivers an extra layer of security when the heavens open.
In conclusion, while the Defender 2 falls short in wet braking when compared to its sibling, the CrossClimate 2. If wet weather performance is a primary concern for you, the numbers point towards the CrossClimate 2 as the better contender in this specific arena.
Dry
Dry braking performance is a vital aspect of tire safety and functionality, especially for those driving predominantly in dry climates or seeking enhanced control on sun-scorched roads. In this comparison, we set our sights on the dry braking abilities of the Michelin Defender 2 and the CrossClimate 2.
Dry Braking :
- Defender 2 : 100%
- CrossClimate 2 : 110%
The Michelin Defender 2 presented a dry braking distance of 129 feet. While a respectable figure in its own right, when compared against the CrossClimate 2, there’s a noticeable gap. The Michelin CrossClimate 2, with its braking distance of just 117 feet, reiterates its prowess in dry conditions. Given our extensive coverage in the past highlighting the CrossClimate 2’s strength in dry scenarios, this result aligns perfectly with expectations. Indeed, it’s no surprise to anyone familiar with the tire.
To wrap up, the CrossClimate 2 continues to assert its dominance in dry conditions, as affirmed by its superior dry braking distance. For drivers who prioritize sharp braking response on dry roads, the CrossClimate 2 stands out as a top-tier choice, further substantiated by our data and previous coverage.
Mileage
Mileage longevity is a prime factor for many consumers when selecting the perfect tire. With that in mind, let’s delve into the median mileage performances of the Michelin Defender 2 and the CrossClimate 2.
Mileage:
- Defender 2 : 100%
- CrossClimate 2 : 106%
Traditionally, the Defender 2, with its robust design tailored for high mileage, clocks in at a median mileage of 71,000 miles. It has been the tire of choice for many drivers looking to extract maximum distance from their set. Given its design intent, one would naturally expect it to lead in the mileage department.
However, here’s where the plot thickens. The CrossClimate 2, a tire better known for its all-weather capabilities, surpasses expectations by logging an impressive 75,000 miles for its median mileage. To many, this might come as an unexpected turn, as the CrossClimate 2 has managed to outpace the mileage-focused Defender 2.
In conclusion, the CrossClimate 2 not only showcases its adeptness in varying weather conditions but also demonstrates that it can go the distance, challenging and even exceeding specialized high-mileage tires like the Defender 2. This unexpected revelation is a testament to Michelin’s commitment to innovation and tire excellence.
Handling, Comfort & Noise
NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) plays a crucial role in determining the overall driving experience. As tires are a primary source of NVH in vehicles, understanding their performance in these aspects is essential. Let’s compare the NVH attributes of the Michelin Defender 2 and the CrossClimate 2:
Handling :
- Defender 2 : 100%
- CrossClimate 2 : 100%
Rated at 3.5/5, the Defender 2 provides a balanced handling performance, giving drivers a sense of control and stability. Mirroring its counterpart, the CrossClimate 2 also scores a 3.5/5, indicating that when it comes to handling, both tires are neck and neck.
Quite Ride:
- Defender 2 : 100%
- CrossClimate 2 : 95%
With a rating of 4/5, the Defender 2 emphasizes a quieter ride. This tire manages to dampen road noises effectively, ensuring a serene driving environment. At 3/5, while the CrossClimate 2 is not overly loud, it doesn’t suppress road noise as well as the Defender 2. Drivers might experience a tad more ambient noise in comparison.
Comfort:
- Defender 2 : 100%
- CrossClimate 2 : 95%
Scoring a solid 4/5, the Defender 2 is designed with comfort in mind. It manages to absorb most of the road’s imperfections, offering a smoother ride. At 3/5, while still offering a reasonable level of comfort, the CrossClimate 2 falls slightly behind its counterpart. Passengers and drivers may feel a bit more of the road’s nuances.
Summary:
While both tires offer commendable handling capabilities, the Defender 2 takes the lead in the NVH arena, excelling in both quietness and comfort. For those who prioritize a serene and smooth ride, the Defender 2 might be the more favorable option. However, the choice ultimately depends on individual preferences and driving conditions.
Comparison of UTQG Values: Michelin Defender 2 vs. CrossClimate 2
UTQG (Uniform Tire Quality Grading) values offer a standardized way to compare various performance attributes of tires. Let’s dissect the values for Michelin’s Defender 2 and CrossClimate 2 to understand their implications:
| Brand | Tireline | Size | Tread Wear | Traction | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin | Defender 2 | All | 840 | B | B |
| Michelin | CrossClimate 2 | All | 640 | B | A |
Tread Wear:
- Michelin Defender 2: Boasts a high tread wear value of 840. Tread wear grades are indicative of a tire’s relative wear rate. The higher the tread wear number, the longer you can expect the tread to last under normal driving conditions.
- Michelin CrossClimate 2: Comes in at 640, which is lower than the Defender 2. This suggests that under standardized testing, its tread might wear out quicker than the Defender 2.
Traction:
- Both Defender 2 and CrossClimate 2: Score a ‘B’ grade. This grade reflects the tire’s ability to stop on wet asphalt and concrete under controlled conditions. Both tires showcase comparable performance in this domain.
Temperature:
- Michelin Defender 2: With a ‘B’ grade, it indicates satisfactory resistance to heat and its ability to dissipate heat when running under controlled conditions.
- Michelin CrossClimate 2: Achieves an ‘A’ grade, reflecting a higher resistance to heat compared to the Defender 2.
Relating UTQG Tread Wear to Median Mileage:
Interestingly, when comparing the tread wear values with the previously mentioned median mileage, things seem a bit incongruous. The Defender 2, with its higher UTQG tread wear value of 840, had a median mileage of 71,000 miles. In contrast, the CrossClimate 2, with a lower tread wear value of 640, outperformed with a median mileage of 75,000 miles.
Conclusion:
While UTQG values offer a guideline, it’s essential to remember that real-world conditions, driving habits, and maintenance can significantly influence tire longevity. The seeming discrepancy between the Defender 2’s higher UTQG tread wear number and its slightly lower median mileage, compared to the CrossClimate 2, is a perfect example that numbers don’t always tell the full story. Consumers should use UTQG as one of many factors when making tire choices and not as an absolute metric.
Price
When comparing the prices for the tire size 205/55R16, the Michelin Defender 2 is priced at $166, making it slightly more affordable than the Michelin CrossClimate 2, which comes in at $174. This represents a price premium of approximately 5% for the CrossClimate 2, suggesting that consumers might need to invest a tad more for the features and benefits that the latter tire brings to the table.
Tire size: 205/55R16
- Defender 2 : $166
- CrossClimate 2 : $174
Difference: +5% more expensive for CrossClimate 2
Conclusion:
After thorough analysis and weighing the factors at hand, I can’t help but be impressed by the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Speaking from years of experience in the tire industry, it’s not often you encounter a tire that manages to strike a harmonious balance between wet & dry braking performance and long-lasting mileage. What’s particularly commendable is how the CrossClimate 2, despite not being singularly mileage-focused like the Defender 2, manages to surpass it in longevity.
Moreover, the cherry on top is the 3 peak mountain certification. This emblem, which is not just any mark but a testament to its winter capabilities, showcases that the CrossClimate 2 isn’t just a fair-weather friend. It’s designed to stand by you, providing reliable performance even when winter challenges rear their frosty heads.
To put it succinctly, if one had to make a choice based on the metrics and findings we’ve explored, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emerges as the superior option. It deftly melds safety, durability, and versatile performance, making it a well-rounded choice for discerning drivers.
Dr Edwin Pang