Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs General Altimax 365 AW: On one side, we have the Michelin CrossClimate 2 – the undisputed champion of all-weather tires, setting the benchmark for performance and reliability. On the other, the General Altimax 365 AW, crafted by Continental, steps into the ring as a bold contender, ready to prove its worth in this fierce all-weather showdown. Can the Altimax 365 AW challenge Michelin’s reign, or will the CrossClimate 2 maintain its crown? Let the battle of all-weather dominance begin!
Table of Contents
Results: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs General Altimax 365 AW
Results below were taken from Canadian Tire’s Road Rated test with a total of 10 tires tested. The graph below shows the comparison between Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs General Altimax 365 AW based on the relevant performance category. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
Canadian Tire’s road-rated test consolidates all performance aspects—wet, dry, comfort, fuel economy, ice, and snow—into a single score for each category. While this approach provides a solid overall assessment, it does not isolate specific metrics like braking distance. However, the combined score still offers a reliable approximation of a tire’s performance across various conditions.
Wet
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 outperforms the General Altimax 365 AW by 9% in wet conditions, stopping shorter, resisting hydroplaning better, and maintaining stronger grip. The Altimax 365 AW takes longer to stop and loses grip sooner, giving the CrossClimate 2 a clear edge.
Altimax 365 AW :
- -9% in wet
Snow
The General Altimax 365 AW edges out the Michelin CrossClimate 2 by 1% in snow performance. It offers slightly better traction, braking, and handling on snow-packed surfaces, though the difference is minimal. Both tires perform well, but the Altimax 365 AW holds a slight advantage in snowy conditions.
Altimax 365 AW :
- +1% in snow
Ice
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 outperforms the General Altimax 365 AW on ice by 3%, stopping slightly shorter and providing better grip. The Altimax 365 AW takes longer to brake, giving the CrossClimate 2 a small but important advantage in icy conditions.
Altimax 365 AW :
- -3% in ice
Dry
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 outperforms the General Altimax 365 AW on dry asphalt by 5%, stopping shorter and handling better during cornering and lane changes. The Altimax 365 AW lags slightly, making the CrossClimate 2 the stronger performer in dry conditions.
Altimax 365 AW :
- -5% in dry braking
Comfort
The General Altimax 365 AW surpasses the Michelin CrossClimate 2 by 8% in comfort, producing less cabin noise and offering a smoother ride over various surfaces. The Altimax 365 AW provides a quieter, more comfortable experience, giving it the edge in ride quality.
Altimax 365 AW :
- +8% in comfort
Rolling Resistance
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 is 2% more fuel efficient than the General Altimax 365 AW, meaning it offers slightly lower rolling resistance. This small advantage helps improve fuel economy or EV range, while the Altimax 365 AW consumes slightly more energy.
Altimax 365 AW :
- -2% in fuel economy
Price
The General Altimax 365 AW is 30% cheaper than the Michelin CrossClimate 2 in size 225/60R18, costing $176 compared to the CrossClimate 2’s $228. This makes the Altimax 365 AW a more budget-friendly option.
Tire size: 225/60R18
- CrossClimate 2 : $ 228
Difference: -30% more cheaper for Altimax 365 AW
Conclusion
As a tire expert, I see strengths in both the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and the General Altimax 365 AW. The CrossClimate 2 stands out with superior wet, ice, and dry performance, making it the safer choice for drivers prioritizing handling and grip in challenging conditions. On the other hand, the Altimax 365 AW offers better comfort, quieter rides, and a 30% lower price, making it an excellent value option for those looking for solid all-weather performance without breaking the bank.
Dr Edwin Pang