Skip to Content

Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2

The Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is a battle between an EV-focused all-season tire and a proven standard all-season tire with 3-Peak Mountain certification. Hankook brings the EV efficiency and torque-focused approach, while Continental counters with all-round, winter-ready confidence. So can the EV specialist beat the all-season benchmark?

Results: Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Results below were taken from the 2026 Auto Bild EV All Season Tire Test with a total of 8 tires tested. The graph below shows the comparison between Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2 based on the relevant performance category. The Hankook iON FlexClimatetire was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.

It’s important to note that for subjective tests, the evaluation was based on average lap speed which is commonly used in magazine tests. The tire size of interest is a 215/55R18 which is a common tire size for BYD Atto 3. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle of choice is a Kia EV3 for summer while Cupra Born for winter. 

Testing vehicle of choice: Cupra Born on snow handling action
Testing vehicle of choice: Cupra Born on snow handling action

Wet

In the wet tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate clearly leads the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 across all areas. It stops 1.5 m shorter, which matches around 4% better wet braking, carries 1.2 km/h more speed, around 2% better wet handling, and has a strong 6.2 km/h higher aquaplaning speed, around 8% better resistance. Overall, Hankook has the stronger wet package, especially when standing water becomes the main challenge.

AllSeasonContact 2 :

  • -4% in wet braking
  • -2% in wet handling
  • -8% in aquaplaning

Snow

In snow, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has a small but consistent edge over the Hankook iON FlexClimate. It stops 0.1 m shorter from 50–0 km/h, which is around 1% better, delivers 71 N more traction, around 2% better, and carries 0.9 km/h higher speed in snow handling, also around 2% better. Overall, Continental is slightly stronger on snow, but the gap is small, showing that the EV-focused Hankook still performs very close to the standard all-season benchmark.

AllSeasonContact 2 :

  • +1% in snow braking
  • +2% in snow traction
  • +2% in snow handling

Mileage

For mileage, the Hankook iON FlexClimate lasts 54,560 km, while the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 reaches 48,070 km. That gives Hankook a clear 6,490 km longer wear life, or around 12% better mileage. Overall, Hankook has the stronger durability result here, making it the better choice if long-term wear is a key priority.

AllSeasonContact 2 :

  • -12% in mileage

Rolling Resistance

For rolling resistance, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is more efficient at 7.05 N/kN, while the Hankook iON FlexClimate records 7.41 N/kN. That gives Continental a 0.36 N/kN lower rolling resistance, or around 5% better efficiency. Overall, Continental has the advantage here, which should help slightly with energy consumption and EV driving range.

AllSeasonContact 2 :

  • +5% in rolling resistance

Dry

In dry braking, the Hankook iON FlexClimate stops in 39.8 m, while the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 needs 42.0 m, giving Hankook a clear 2.2 m shorter stopping distance, or around 5% better performance. In dry handling, Hankook also carries 92.6 km/h compared to 90.8 km/h for Continental, a 1.8 km/h higher handling speed, or around 2% better. Overall, Hankook is stronger in the dry, especially under braking, while Continental trails slightly in both dry safety and handling performance.

AllSeasonContact 2 :

  • -5% in dry braking
  • -2%  in dry handling

Noise

For drive-by noise, both tires are almost identical. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is slightly quieter at 71.1 dB(A), while the Hankook iON FlexClimate measures 71.3 dB(A), giving Continental a tiny 0.2 dB(A) advantage, effectively 0% difference. Overall, noise is basically a draw, with no meaningful real-world gap between the two.

AllSeasonContact 2 :

  • 0% in exterior noise (-0.2 dB)

Price

For price, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is slightly cheaper at €131, while the Hankook iON FlexClimate costs €136. That makes Continental €5 cheaper, or around 4% lower in price. Overall, Continental has a small price advantage, but the gap is not big enough to strongly change the value picture by itself.

Tire size: 215/55R18

Difference: -4% more cheaper for AllSeasonContact 2

Conclusion

Overall, the Hankook iON FlexClimate looks really strong in this test. It clearly leads in wet braking, wet handling, aquaplaning, dry braking, dry handling, and especially mileage, making it a very complete EV-focused all-season tire. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 still has its advantages, with slightly better snow performance, lower rolling resistance, marginally quieter drive-by noise, and a slightly cheaper price. But from a tire expert point of view, the Hankook stands out as the more impressive overall package, especially considering how strong it performs in both safety and durability.

Dr Edwin Pang
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]