Hankook iON evo AS vs Continental ProContact RX (T1): Choosing the right tires for your Tesla Model 3 is crucial, and today, we’re pitting the EV-specific Hankook iON evo AS against the original equipment (OE) Continental ProContact RX (T1). The Hankook iON evo AS, designed specifically for electric vehicles, promises superior efficiency and performance tailored to EV demands. Meanwhile, the Continental ProContact RX, the factory-installed tire on many Model 3s, offers tried-and-true reliability and performance.
Will the specialized Hankook iON evo AS dethrone the trusted Continental ProContact RX? Let’s dive into this exciting tire showdown and find out which one deserves a spot on your Tesla Model 3!
Table of Contents
Results: Hankook iON evo AS vs Continental ProContact RX (T1)
Results below were taken from Tire Rack’s Testing EV Tires 2024 test. A total of 9 tires were tested on Tire Rack’s proving ground including a variety of different segment tires. The graph below shows the comparison between Hankook iON evo AS vs Continental ProContact RX (T1) based on the relevant performance category. The Hankook iON evo AS was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
As both tires are categorized as all season tires, Tire Rack has planned the snow & ice in its testing portfolio. A detailed testing on snow including acceleration, braking & handling will be available only at the end of the 2024 winter season. The tire size of interest is a 235/40R19 which is a common tire size for Tesla Model 3. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle for this tire test is a 2023 Tesla Model 3 Performance.
Wet
We often expect OE tires to underperform in wet conditions as their main focus is usually on dry performance and rolling resistance. However, the Continental ProContact RX (T1) proves us wrong. In wet braking, the Hankook iON evo AS takes 104.60 feet to stop from 50 mph, while the Continental ProContact RX (T1) outperforms it, stopping in just 101.00 feet—a difference of 3.60 feet.
In wet handling, the Hankook iON evo AS completes a lap in 31.91 seconds, whereas the Continental ProContact RX (T1) again shows its superiority by finishing in 30.94 seconds, nearly a full second faster. This performance highlights the unexpected wet condition prowess of the Continental ProContact RX (T1) over the Hankook iON evo AS.
iON evo AS:
During wet testing, the steering felt lighter than on dry roads but still maintained accuracy and precision. It was crucial to avoid combining braking or acceleration with turning to prevent the car from sliding or losing control, which could be risky for unprepared drivers in emergencies. The reduced traction also meant that braking needed to be planned earlier, leaving less room for mistakes.
Test driver feedback on iON evo AS
ProContact RX (T1):
In wet conditions, the tire maintained the precise and responsive steering experienced during dry road rides. The demanding corners boosted confidence in its authoritative handling, though overconfidence could cause the rear to lose traction if drivers weren’t cautious when accelerating out of corners. Braking performance was strong and well-aligned with the tire’s grip.
Test driver feedback on ProContact RX (T1)
ProContact RX (T1) :
- +4% in wet braking
- +3% in wet handling (lap time)
Dry
We were surprised to find that the replacement tire outperformed in dry conditions, which is typically the strong point of OE tires. In dry braking, the Hankook iON evo AS stops in 88.70 feet from 50 mph, outperforming the Continental ProContact RX (T1), which takes 93.50 feet—a difference of 4.80 feet.
In dry handling, the Hankook iON evo AS completes a lap in 29.13 seconds, slightly behind the Continental ProContact RX (T1) which finishes in 29.01 seconds. Despite the narrow margin, the replacement Hankook tire shows impressive dry performance, challenging the OE Continental tire’s expected dominance.
iON evo AS:
On dry surfaces, the Hankook iON evo AS shed most of its wet condition issues, revealing impressive agility and strong braking performance. It handled smoothly and was much more forgiving, showcasing its true athletic potential.
Test driver feedback on iON evo AS
ProContact RX (T1):
In dry conditions, the tire continued to impress with firmer steering, enhanced cornering grip, and overall balanced handling. It may not be perfect, but as a complete package, it offered a commendable blend of fun and precision.
Test driver feedback on ProContact RX (T1)
ProContact RX (T1) :
- -5% in dry braking
- ~0% in dry handling (lap time)
Power Consumption
In terms of power consumption, the Hankook iON evo AS performs better, using 263 watt-hours per mile compared to the Continental ProContact RX (T1)’s 272 watt-hours per mile. This difference indicates that the Hankook tire is more efficient, consuming 9 watt-hours less per mile. It’s surprising to see the replacement tire outperforming the OE tire in rolling resistance, showcasing superior efficiency.
ProContact RX (T1) :
- -3% in power consumption (efficiency)
UTQG ratings
Comparing the UTQG values, the Hankook iON evo AS has a tread wear rating of 600, while the Continental ProContact RX (T1) has a rating of 400. This suggests that the Hankook tire is likely to last longer. Additionally, the Hankook tire has a tread depth of 10/32 inch compared to Continental’s 9/32 inch, further indicating higher mileage potential. The mileage warranty also favors Hankook at 50,000 miles, compared to 45,000 miles for the Continental. Despite these differences, both tires have the same traction and temperature ratings of A.
| Brand | Tireline | Size | Tread Wear | Traction | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook | iON evo AS | All | 600 | A | A |
| Continental | ProContact RX (T1) | All | 400 | A | A |
Price
For the tire size 235/40R19, the Hankook iON evo AS is priced at $267, while the Continental ProContact RX (T1) costs $300. This means the ProContact RX (T1) is 11% more expensive than the iON evo AS.
Tire size: 235/40R19
- iON evo AS : $267
- ProContact RX (T1): $300
Difference: +11% more expensive for ProContact RX (T1).
Summary
As a tire expert, I can highlight that both the Hankook iON evo AS and Continental ProContact RX (T1) have their strengths for the Tesla Model 3. The Hankook iON evo AS stands out with better power consumption, longer tread wear, and a more affordable price. Its wet braking and handling are also impressive, making it a great value for money.
The Continental ProContact RX (T1), despite its higher price, excels in wet performance, showcasing superior braking and handling. It also provides excellent dry handling and a balanced driving experience. In summary, if you seek efficiency and value, go for the Hankook iON evo AS. If you prioritize wet performance and proven OE reliability, the Continental ProContact RX (T1) is a solid choice.
Dr Edwin Pang