Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107: The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (2022) and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 (2021) face off in this UHP summer showdown. The Asymmetric 6, a proven winner in multiple tests, delivers superior all round performance, while the V107 leans on its motorsport DNA for precision. Which tire truly reigns supreme? Let’s find out!
Table of Contents
Results: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
The results presented here are from the 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test, where 20 of the best tire models were selected from an initial pool of 50. Given the high cost and extensive nature of wear testing, we were delighted to have it included. The accompanying graph provides a side-by-side comparison of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107 across various performance categories, with the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 serving as the benchmark at 100%.
The tire size of interest is the 225/40R18 tire size, a popular choice for vehicles like the BMW 3 series Audi A4. For further insights into various tire sizes, feel free to consult our latest tire size table. The tests were conducted using a standard BMW 1 series as the test vehicle.
Wet
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stops 5.4 meters shorter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 in wet braking, a 11% advantage in stopping distance. In wet handling, the Asymmetric 6 maintains an average speed 1.6 km/h faster, giving it a 2% edge in overall grip and stability through corners. Straight-line aquaplaning also favors the Asymmetric 6, which holds on 1.5 km/h longer before losing contact with the road, translating to a 2% better resistance to hydroplaning.
Advan Sport V107:
- -11% in wet braking
- -2% in wet handling
- -2% in aquaplaning
Dry
In dry braking, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stops 0.2 meters shorter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, giving it a 1% advantage in stopping distance. However, in dry handling, the Asymmetric 6 carries 1.2 km/h more speed through corners, translating to a 1% better performance in overall handling precision and grip.
Advan Sport V107:
- +1% in dry braking
- -1% in dry handling
Wear
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 lasts 18,130 km longer than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107, giving it a 51% advantage in wear performance. This means the Asymmetric 6 offers significantly better longevity, making it the more durable choice for high-mileage drivers.
Advan Sport V107:
- -34% in mileage
Comfort & Noise
It’s unusual to see such a big difference in exterior noise between two UHP tires—quite surprising! The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 registers 3.5 dB quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107, making it 5% less noisy and significantly improving cabin comfort. Subjective comfort also favors the Asymmetric 6, scoring 0.8 points higher, a 4% advantage, meaning it delivers a noticeably smoother and more refined ride.
Advan Sport V107:
- -4% in subjective comfort
- -5% in exterior noise (+3.5 dB)
Rolling Resistance
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has a lower rolling resistance at 8.97 N/kN, compared to 10.62 N/kN for the Yokohama Advan Sport V107. This gives the Asymmetric 6 a 16% advantage, meaning it requires less energy to roll, which can contribute to better fuel efficiency and reduced CO₂ emissions.
Advan Sport V107:
- -16% in rolling resistance
Price
The Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is €14 cheaper than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, making it 16% more affordable in the 225/40 R18 size. This price difference may appeal to budget-conscious buyers, but with the Asymmetric 6 offering superior wear, comfort, noise levels, and rolling resistance, the extra cost could be justified by its overall performance and longevity.
Tire size: 225/40 R18
- Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: € 101
- Advan Sport V107: € 87
Difference: -16% more cheaper for Advan Sport V107
Summary
From a tire expert’s perspective, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is the clear winner in this UHP showdown. It outperforms the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 in nearly every key area—superior wet and dry handling, significantly better wear, lower noise, greater comfort, and lower rolling resistance. The 34% advantage in wear alone makes it a far more cost-effective choice in the long run, even with its 16% higher price tag. While the Advan Sport V107 offers decent performance and a lower upfront cost, the Asymmetric 6 dominates where it matters most, making it the smarter pick for those who prioritize performance, comfort, and durability.
Dr Edwin Pang