Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Pirelli P Zero PZ4: In the ultra-high performance (UHP) tire segment, the stage is set for an epic showdown between two industry titans: the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Pirelli P Zero PZ4. This battle pitches Goodyear’s latest innovation against Pirelli’s renowned precision engineering, each claiming superior handling, durability, and traction to dominate the UHP category.
Gear up for a head-to-head comparison that promises to push the limits of performance, grip, and road responsiveness. With both contenders boasting cutting-edge technology and a storied legacy of performance, this duel is not just about tires—it’s about defining the future of high-speed driving excellence. Who will take the crown in this clash of the titans? The stage is set, and the excitement is mounting.
Table of Contents
Results: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Pirelli P Zero PZ4
Results below were taken from the 2023 AutoBild Summer Test while includes an amazing 50 tires from its preliminary braking rounds. Only 20 tires made it through to the final round and a full detail evaluation was completed with these 20 tires. The wet & dry handling performances are evaluated objectively using the average lap speed rather than the preferred subjective ratings.
The graph above shows the comparison between Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Pirelli P Zero PZ4 based on the relevant performance category. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark. The tire size of interest is 225/45 R18 which is a common tire size for Mercedes-Benz C 200 and Kia Stinger . You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle of choice is a BMW 3 series.
Wet
In the competition of wet performance between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Pirelli P Zero PZ4, the contest is tight, with each tire showcasing its strengths under challenging conditions. When it comes to wet braking, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stops in 39.7 meters from 100 km/h, which is slightly longer than the Pirelli P Zero PZ4’s 38.9 meters, marking a minimal but notable difference of 0.8 meters in favor of the Pirelli.
In terms of wet handling, the average speed achieved by the tires reveals another close race. The Goodyear manages a respectable 76.7 km/h, slightly trailing behind the Pirelli’s 77.2 km/h. This small difference underscores the Pirelli’s superior agility and control under wet conditions, albeit by a narrow margin. The battle extends to aquaplaning resistance, where Goodyear takes the lead in straight-line aquaplaning with a slipping speed of 106.3 km/h compared to Pirelli’s 104.4 km/h, indicating better resistance to water and improved safety at higher speeds for the Goodyear.
Curved aquaplaning tests, which measure the maximum lateral acceleration before losing grip, show Goodyear with a slight edge at 3.93 m/sec² over Pirelli’s 3.8 m/sec². This suggests that the Goodyear tire maintains better contact with the road surface during cornering in wet conditions, offering a tad more confidence during dynamic maneuvers.
Overall, the comparison reveals a nuanced battle of wet performances, with the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 showing a slight advantage in braking and handling, while the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 excels in aquaplaning resistance, both straight and curved. Each tire brings to the table a unique set of capabilities, making the choice between them a matter of prioritizing specific performance aspects under wet conditions.
P Zero PZ4 :
- +2% in wet braking
- +1% in wet handling (lap speed)
- -2% in straight aquaplaning
- -3% in curved aquaplaning
Dry
In dry conditions, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 offer compelling performances that highlight their engineering and design strengths. When it comes to dry braking, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 demonstrates superior stopping power by halting from 100 km/h in 33.2 meters, outperforming the Pirelli P Zero PZ4, which requires 34 meters. This 0.8-meter shorter stopping distance showcases Goodyear’s edge in braking efficiency and safety under dry conditions.
On the dry handling front, both tires exhibit exceptional capabilities, but the competition remains tight. The Pirelli P Zero PZ4 slightly edges out its rival with an average speed of 121.3 km/h, compared to the Goodyear’s 120.9 km/h. This marginal difference of 0.4 km/h suggests that the Pirelli tire may offer a tad more precision and responsiveness during dry handling maneuvers, allowing drivers to navigate corners and curves with slightly greater confidence and speed.
Overall, the dry performance comparison between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 reveals a closely fought battle, with Goodyear taking the lead in braking efficiency and Pirelli showcasing a slight advantage in handling speed. Both tires excel in their respective areas, making the choice between them one of personal preference based on specific driving conditions and performance priorities.
P Zero PZ4 :
- -2% in dry braking
- ~0% in dry handling
Wear
In the aspect of wear performance, the difference between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 is not just significant; it’s huge. The Goodyear tire showcases remarkable durability, capable of lasting up to 63,200 kilometers before needing a replacement. In contrast, the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 trails significantly behind, with a lifespan of only 32,800 kilometers. This substantial disparity of 30,400 kilometers underscores a major advantage for Goodyear in terms of longevity and value. Such a difference highlights Goodyear’s superior ability to withstand the rigors of the road over a much longer period, making it a potentially more economical choice for drivers who prioritize tire wear and overall durability.
P Zero PZ4 :
- -48% in mileage
Noise
When comparing the exterior noise levels of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Pirelli P Zero PZ4, there’s a noticeable but slight difference. The Goodyear tire produces noise at 73.2 decibels, making it marginally quieter than the Pirelli, which registers at 73.7 decibels. This difference of 0.5 decibels, while not massive, indicates that the Goodyear offers a slightly more serene driving experience, reducing the amount of road noise that is transmitted into the cabin. Such a distinction, albeit small, can contribute to a more comfortable and quieter ride, particularly on long journeys or at higher speeds where tire noise can become more pronounced.
P Zero PZ4 :
- -1% in exterior noise (+0.5 dB)
Rolling Resistance
In the area of rolling resistance, which is a measure of the energy lost by a tire as it rolls under a load, there’s a discernible difference between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Pirelli P Zero PZ4. The Goodyear tire exhibits a rolling resistance of 8.01 Newtons per kiloNewton (N/kN), which is slightly lower than the Pirelli’s 8.33 N/kN. This difference of 0.32 N/kN indicates that the Goodyear tire is more efficient, requiring less energy to maintain motion. Lower rolling resistance means the tire contributes to better fuel efficiency and reduced environmental impact due to lower CO2 emissions. Although the gap is not vast, the Goodyear’s advantage in this aspect can lead to cost savings over time, making it a more economical choice for drivers concerned with fuel economy and the environmental footprint of their vehicle.
P Zero PZ4 :
- -4% in rolling resistance
Price
When comparing the prices for the tire size 225/45 R18, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is priced at €132, while the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 comes in slightly higher at €140. This makes the Pirelli tire about 6% more expensive than the Goodyear.
Tire size: 225/45 R18
- Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: €132
- P Zero PZ4 : €140
Difference: +6% more expensive for P Zero PZ4.
Summary
As a tire expert, I find the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 to be the clear winner over the Pirelli P Zero PZ4. The Goodyear shines with superior aquaplaning resistance in wet conditions and offers marginally better dry braking performance. Its standout feature is the significantly longer wear life, almost double that of the Pirelli, providing exceptional value over time. Additionally, it boasts slightly lower exterior noise and better rolling resistance, indicating a quieter, more fuel-efficient ride. Despite its performance advantages, the Goodyear is also more cost-effective, being priced lower than the Pirelli. These factors combined make the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 the superior choice for both safety and economy.
Dr Edwin Pang