Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6: In the world of high-performance tires, two giants of the industry continue to battle for supremacy with their latest offerings: the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Bridgestone Turanza 6. Launched in 2021 and 2022 respectively, these tires have quickly captured the attention of car enthusiasts and experts alike. While the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has enjoyed an impressive track record in the press test, the newly minted Turanza 6 is eager to prove itself as a worthy competitor.
As we delve into the intricacies of these two exceptional tires, we’ll explore their unique features, performance capabilities, and the impact they’ve made in the automotive world. Buckle up as we take a closer look at the showdown between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Bridgestone Turanza 6, and discover which tire truly soars above the rest.
Table of Contents
Results
Results below were taken from the 2023 AutoBild Summer Test while includes an amazing 50 tires from its preliminary braking rounds. Only 20 tires made it through to the final round and a full detail evaluation was completed with these 20 tires. The wet & dry handling performances are evaluated objectively using the average lap speed rather than the preferred subjective ratings.
The graph above shows the comparison between Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6 based on the relevant performance category. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark. The tire size of interest is 225/45 R18 which is a common tire size for Mercedes-Benz C 200 and Kia Stinger . You can check out our latest tire size table for more information.
Wet
Safety has always been the primary concern when it comes to wet performance. In wet conditions, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 offers outstanding braking performance with an “A” rating on the EU wet label, while the Turanza 6 only holds a “B” wet label rating. Test results confirm these rankings, as the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 recorded a braking distance of 39.7 meters from 100 km/h, while the Turanza 6 had a considerably longer braking distance of 43.1 meters from the same speed. This resulted in a significant difference of 3.4 meters, with the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 securing the 4th best spot, while the Turanza 6 ranked 5th from last place out of the 20 tires that competed in the final round. These results highlight a clear difference in wet braking performance between the Turanza 6 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric.
With such a notable advantage in wet braking, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 maintains its dominance by achieving a much higher average lap speed of 76.7 km/h compared to the 73.9 km/h of the Turanza 6. This trend persisted in aquaplaning performance, as the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 took the lead with a higher hydroplaning speed of 106.3 km/h compared to the 102.3 km/h achieved by the Turanza 6. The same trend was observed in lateral aquaplaning, with the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 having a +0.3 m/s2 advantage over the Turanza 6. Overall, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 demonstrated clear dominance in wet performance as it outperformed the Turanza 6 in every single wet performance test.
Turanza 6 :
- -7.9% in wet braking
- -3.6% in wet handling (lap speed)
- -3.8% in straight aquaplaning
- -7.6% in curved aquaplaning
Dry
In dry conditions, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 outperformed the Turanza 6 in terms of performance. Based on the test results, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 recorded a braking distance of 33.2 meters from 100 km/h, while the Turanza 6 had a longer braking distance of 35.7 meters from the same speed. The difference of 2.5 meters is not something to be overlooked in real-life situations. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 topped the standings, while the Turanza 6 took the 16th spot.
The trend continued in dry handling, with the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 finishing with a higher average lap speed of 120.9 km/h compared to the 118.2 km/h of the Turanza 6. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 finished 2nd in the overall standings for wet handling, while the Turanza 6 placed in the middle of the pack. Overall, mirroring the wet performance results, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 demonstrated clear dominance in dry performance, outperforming the Turanza 6 in every single dry performance test.
Turanza 6 :
- -7% in dry braking
- -2.2% in dry handling
Noise
Finally, although the Turanza 6 fell short in both wet and dry performance categories, it managed to gain an edge over the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 in terms of noise levels. The Turanza 6 proved to be 0.8 dB quieter than its rival, providing a more comfortable and quieter ride for passengers and drivers alike. In this aspect, the Turanza 6 secured the 6th position in the rankings, while the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 finished in the middle of the pack. This slight advantage in noise reduction demonstrates that the Turanza 6 still has some merits when considering overall tire performance, particularly for those who prioritize a quieter driving experience.
Turanza 6 :
- +1.1% in exterior noise (-0.8 dB)
Rolling Resistance
When considering high-performance, extreme sporty tires, rolling resistance is not usually a primary concern for buyers, as they tend to prioritize grip and handling capabilities. However, as sustainability and fuel efficiency become increasingly important in today’s automotive landscape, understanding where these tires stand in terms of rolling resistance is worthwhile. In this regard, the Turanza 6 significantly outperforms the competition, recording the best rolling resistance value of 7.1 N/kN and claiming the top spot. This impressive figure translates to reduced fuel consumption and lower CO2 emissions, contributing to a more environmentally friendly driving experience.
On the other hand, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 posted a higher coefficient value of 8 N/kN, indicating a slightly less efficient performance in terms of rolling resistance. While this difference may not be a decisive factor for those seeking maximum performance, it is worth noting for drivers who are increasingly mindful of their environmental footprint and fuel economy. Consequently, the Turanza 6’s superior rolling resistance performance presents another aspect to consider when comparing these two high-performance tires.
Turanza 6 :
- +12.3% in rolling resistance
Wear
As mentioned earlier, mileage tests are quite rare, so we are pleased that Auto Bild decided to conduct them for all 20 tires that advanced to the second round. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 outperformed all competitors in the mileage test, finishing on top with a projected mileage of 63,200 km. This impressive result is 22,800 km more than the 7th place finish of 40,400 km achieved by the Turanza 6. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 clearly demonstrated exceptional performance in managing target conflicts, boasting best-in-class wet braking and mileage ratings. In fact, it offers an impressive 36% better mileage compared to the Turanza 6.
Turanza 6 :
- -36.1% in mileage
Price
Bridgestone typically prices their products slightly lower than Goodyear, opting to play the volume game in the long run. Based on the prices we surveyed, we were surprised to find that the Bridgestone Turanza 6 costs €17 more than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, which definitely did not follow the general trend.
Tire size: 225/45 R18
Turanza 6 : €149
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: €132
Difference: +11% more expensive for Turanza 6.
Summary
In conclusion, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has proven itself to be a formidable contender in the realm of high-performance tires, demonstrating exceptional capabilities in wet, dry, and mileage performances. On the other hand, the Turanza 6 stands out in areas such as noise reduction and rolling resistance, catering to drivers who prioritize comfort and sustainability.
When taking into account the overall performance of both tires, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 emerges as the undisputed victor in this head-to-head comparison. Its superior performance in key areas like wet and dry handling, as well as impressive mileage, make it an attractive choice for enthusiasts seeking a tire that delivers outstanding results in a variety of conditions. However, the Turanza 6 should not be entirely dismissed, as its strengths in noise reduction and rolling resistance may appeal to a different segment of drivers who value a more comfortable and environmentally friendly driving experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two high-quality tires will depend on the individual’s priorities and driving preferences.