Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport: We’re witnessing a milestone moment — the first official big all-season tire test appearance of the brand-new Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport, launched in 2025. It enters the arena against none other than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2, a proven benchmark in the segment. This clash isn’t just another matchup; it’s a battle between Continental’s established all-season leader and Michelin’s bold new challenger aiming to redefine what performance and versatility mean in year-round driving.
Table of Contents
Results: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport
Results below were taken from AutoBild’s 2025 All Season Tire Test with a total of 15 tires tested including a reference winter & summer tire. The graph below shows the comparison between Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport based on the relevant performance category. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
Since we are talking about the all season with 3 peak mountain certification segment, the snow performances was tested. The tire size of interest is 225/40 R18 which is a common tire size for Volkswagen Golf & Audi A3. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle is a Volkswagen Golf.
Wet
In wet braking, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stops at 44.9 meters, which is 2.4 meters shorter than the Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport at 47.3 meters, a 5% advantage for Continental. In wet handling, Continental also proves quicker, averaging 74.7 km/h compared to Michelin’s 71.4 km/h, giving it a 3.3 km/h edge or 4% faster. However, in straight aquaplaning, Michelin slightly takes the lead at 73 km/h versus Continental’s 72.5 km/h, a 0.5 km/h advantage or about 1% better.
Overall, Continental dominates in braking and handling, while Michelin only edges ahead in aquaplaning, making the Continental the stronger performer in wet conditions.
CrossClimate 3 Sport :
- -5% in wet braking
- -4% in wet handling
- +1% in straight aquaplaning
Snow
In snow braking, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stops in 23.9 meters, 0.5 meters shorter than the Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport at 24.4 meters, giving Continental a 2% advantage. In snow traction, Continental pulls with 2951 N versus Michelin’s 2946 N, a negligible 5 N difference or about 0%. But in snow handling, Michelin strikes back with an average speed of 53.3 km/h, 0.7 km/h faster than Continental’s 52.6 km/h, a 1% advantage.
Overall, Continental holds the edge in braking, Michelin leads in handling, and traction is essentially equal, making it a very balanced battle in the snow.
CrossClimate 3 Sport :
- -2% in snow braking
- +1% in snow traction
- ~0% in snow handling
Mileage
In wear, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 lasts 48,650 km, which is 2,100 km longer than the Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport at 46,550 km, giving Continental about a 4% advantage in mileage. However, in abrasion, Michelin performs better, losing 912 g of tread material compared to Continental’s 1125 g, a 213 g difference or 23% lower abrasion. Overall, Continental offers longer tread life, while Michelin shows better tread durability with significantly less material loss.
CrossClimate 3 Sport :
- -4% in mileage
- +23% in abrasion
Dry
In dry braking, the Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport stops in 38.8 meters, which is 2.7 meters shorter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 at 41.5 meters, giving Michelin a clear 7% advantage. In dry handling, Continental edges ahead at 101.1 km/h compared to Michelin’s 100.6 km/h, a 0.5 km/h difference or about 0% faster.
CrossClimate 3 Sport :
- +7% in dry braking
- ~0% in dry handling
NVH
In noise, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 measures 72 dB, which is 0.7 dB quieter than the Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport at 72.7 dB, about a 1% difference. Overall,
CrossClimate 3 Sport :
- -1% in exterior noise (+0.7 dB)
Rolling Resistance
In rolling resistance, the Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport measures 7.39 N/kN, which is 0.96 N/kN lower than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 at 8.35 N/kN, giving Michelin a 13% advantage.
CrossClimate 3 Sport :
- +13% in rolling resistance
Price
For the 225/40 R18 size, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is priced at €108, while the Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport comes in at €136. That makes the Michelin 26% more expensive, highlighting a clear price premium over the Continental.
Tire size: 225/40 R18
- AllSeasonContact 2 : € 108
- CrossClimate 3 Sport : € 136
Difference: +26% more expensive for CrossClimate 3 Sport
Conclusion from a Tire Expert’s Perspective:
From my perspective as a tire expert, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 impresses with strong wet and snow braking, solid handling balance, longer mileage, and slightly quieter ride comfort. On the other hand, the Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport delivers standout dry braking, lower rolling resistance for efficiency, and a touch more precision in snow handling. Both tires bring real strengths, but when I look at the complete picture of safety, longevity, and value, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 comes out as the overall winner.
Dr Edwin Pang