Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2: In the ever-evolving world of all-season tires, a thrilling battle emerges as the newly launched Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 steps into the arena, ready to challenge the established prowess of the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2. This face-off between two giants of the tire industry promises to redefine the standards of all-weather driving performance. With Bridgestone entering the segment with cutting-edge technology and a reputation for durability, the Turanza All Season 6 is set to push the boundaries of what drivers expect from their all-season tires.
On the other side, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, known for its exceptional grip and handling in a variety of conditions, stands ready to defend its position as a top choice for drivers seeking reliability and performance throughout the year. This showdown between Bridgestone’s latest innovation and Pirelli’s trusted performance is not just a comparison; it’s a declaration of a new era in all-season driving excellence. Gear up for an epic clash that will leave drivers and enthusiasts eagerly watching as these titans vie for the crown of the ultimate all-weather tire.
Table of Contents
Results: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
Results below were taken from the 2023 Auto Bild All Season Test. A whopping 35 tires were tested this time around with only 16 tires making it into the final round. The graph below shows the comparison between Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 based on the relevant performance category. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
Auto Bild did the full range of test including snow & the expensive wear test. The tire size of interest is a 225/45 R17 which is a common tire size for Volvo S60 & BMW 3 Series. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle of choice is a BMW 3 series.
Wet Showdown
When comparing the wet performance of the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 to the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, it’s evident that each tire has its areas of strength and slight differences that could influence a driver’s preference based on specific wet driving conditions.
In wet braking, from 100 to 0 km/h, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 shows a slight edge over the Pirelli, stopping at 45 meters, which is 1.7 meters shorter than the Pirelli’s 46.7 meters. This difference highlights the Turanza’s superior ability to come to a stop more promptly in wet conditions, which can be crucial for safety in emergency braking situations.
When it comes to wet handling, which measures the average speed around a lap, both tires perform remarkably closely. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 slightly outperforms the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 with an average speed of 74.7 km/h compared to 74.5 km/h. This near-identical performance suggests that both tires offer reliable handling and agility on wet roads, though the Turanza All Season 6 has a marginal advantage.
The comparison extends to performance in a wet circle test, where the Turanza All Season 6 completes the circuit in 11.86 seconds, marginally faster than the Cinturato All Season SF2’s 11.95 seconds. This minor difference indicates that the Bridgestone tire provides slightly better traction and control in consistent wet circular paths.
However, in the straight aquaplaning test, where the tire’s ability to maintain grip and speed in deep water is assessed, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 outperforms the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6. The Pirelli achieves a slipping speed of 81.7 km/h, compared to 79.8 km/h for the Bridgestone, demonstrating the Cinturato’s superior performance in resisting aquaplaning and maintaining control and speed in straight wet conditions.
Overall, both tires exhibit strong performances in wet conditions, with the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 showing advantages in braking and handling, while the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 excels in aquaplaning resistance.
Cinturato All Season SF2 :
- -4% in wet braking
- ~0% in wet handling
- -1% in wet circle
- +2% in aquaplaning
Snow
In snow conditions, the comparison between the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 reveals their respective capabilities and how they measure up against each other in various aspects of snow performance.
Starting with snow braking, from 50 to 0 km/h, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 has a slight advantage, stopping at 23.1 meters, which is 0.5 meters shorter than the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, which stops at 23.6 meters. This difference highlights the Turanza’s slightly more efficient performance in deceleration on snow, potentially offering a safer option in emergency stopping scenarios.
In terms of snow traction, which is measured by the pulling force in Newtons, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 again demonstrates a slight edge with a pulling force of 2660 N, compared to the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2’s 2610 N. This indicates that the Bridgestone tire can provide slightly better grip and acceleration on snow-covered roads.
When comparing snow handling, which looks at the average speed around a lap, both tires offer remarkably similar performance. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 marginally outpaces the Pirelli with an average lap time speed of 57.6 km/h versus 57.5 km/h for the Pirelli. This suggests that both tires are highly capable in maintaining control and stability while navigating through snowy courses, with the Bridgestone having a very slight upper hand.
Lastly, in the snow slalom test, which measures the maximum lateral acceleration in meters per second squared, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 outperforms the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 with a result of 4.16 m/sec^2 compared to 4.04 m/sec^2. This indicates that the Bridgestone tire offers better agility and responsiveness in making quick, successive turns on snow.
Overall, across the board in snow performance tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 consistently shows a slight advantage over the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2. These advantages include shorter braking distances, higher traction, marginally better handling speeds, and greater agility in slalom tests, suggesting that the Bridgestone tire might be the preferred choice for drivers looking for optimal performance in snowy conditions.
Cinturato All Season SF2 :
- -2% in snow braking
- -2% in snow traction
- ~0% in snow handling
- -3% in snow slalom
Dry
In dry conditions, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 slightly outperforms the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2. It stops 0.3 meters shorter in dry braking tests at 38.5 meters versus Pirelli’s 38.8 meters, indicating a minor yet potentially significant advantage in emergency stopping.
Additionally, with dry handling speeds closely matched at 88.8 km/h for Bridgestone and 88.7 km/h for Pirelli, both tires offer comparable control and stability. However, Bridgestone’s marginal gains in braking and handling suggest it as a slightly better choice for those prioritizing peak dry performance, offering a tad more efficiency and responsiveness.
Cinturato All Season SF2 :
- -1% in dry braking
- ~0% in dry handling
Wear
When examining the wear performance of the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 compared to the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, a significant difference in longevity becomes apparent. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 showcases superior durability, with a lifespan of 49,794 kilometers, outlasting the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 by a notable margin of 7,347 kilometers.
This disparity indicates that the Bridgestone tire is more resistant to wear over time, suggesting it could provide drivers with a longer service life before needing replacement. Such a difference emphasizes the Turanza’s advantage for those seeking a tire that combines performance with the practical benefit of extended wear, potentially offering better value over the tire’s lifespan due to fewer replacements. This aspect is particularly important for drivers who prioritize longevity and cost-effectiveness in their tire selection, making the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 a compelling choice in terms of wear performance.
Cinturato All Season SF2 :
- -15% in mileage
Noise
In the evaluation of exterior noise performance, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 shows a slight advantage over the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6. The Pirelli tire generates a lower noise level, measured at 72.2 decibels, compared to the Bridgestone’s 73.3 decibels. This difference of 1.1 decibels indicates that the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 is marginally quieter when in operation, which could contribute to a more pleasant and less intrusive driving experience, especially during long journeys or high-speed travel. Noise levels are an important aspect of tire performance, affecting comfort and overall satisfaction; thus, the lower noise output of the Pirelli tire might be preferable for drivers who value a quieter ride.
Cinturato All Season SF2 :
- +2% in exterior noise (-1.1 dB)
Rolling Resistance & Fuel Consumption Showdown:
In terms of rolling resistance and fuel consumption, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 showcases a notable efficiency advantage over the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2. The rolling resistance of the Bridgestone tire is measured at 7.86 N/kN, which is lower than the Pirelli’s 8.59 N/kN. This lower rolling resistance indicates that the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 requires less energy to roll, leading to less fuel consumption.
Indeed, when looking at fuel consumption figures, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 confirms its efficiency advantage by achieving a fuel consumption rate of 5.46 liters per 100 kilometers, compared to the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2’s 5.68 liters per 100 kilometers. This difference of 0.22 liters per 100 kilometers further illustrates the Bridgestone tire’s ability to offer better fuel economy, translating to cost savings and potentially less environmental impact over the tire’s lifespan.
Overall, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 demonstrates superior performance in terms of both rolling resistance and fuel consumption, making it a more energy-efficient choice that could benefit drivers through reduced fuel costs and a smaller carbon footprint.
Cinturato All Season SF2 :
- -8% in rolling resistance
- -4% in fuel consumption
Price
The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, priced at €109, is about 12% more expensive than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, which costs €96 for the tire size 205/55 R16. This price difference highlights the Cinturato as the pricier option between the two.
Tire size: 205/55 R16
Difference: +12% more expensive for Cinturato All Season SF2.
Expert’s Perspective
After evaluating the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, I’ve concluded that the Bridgestone tire stands out as the winner in this comparison. Its superior performance is evident in several key areas. In wet and snow conditions, it not only stops shorter but also provides better traction and handling, offering drivers a higher level of safety and confidence.
The Bridgestone tire also outperforms in terms of durability, with significantly longer wear life, which translates into better value and less frequent replacements. Moreover, its lower rolling resistance and fuel consumption highlight its efficiency, leading to cost savings over time. While the Pirelli tire performed well, especially in noise reduction, the overall advantages of the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 make it the preferable choice for those seeking a reliable, efficient, and high-performing all-season tire.
Dr Edwin Pang