Hankook iON evo AS vs Bridgestone Turanza EV: Get ready for an electrifying showdown in the world of EV-specific touring all-season tires! On one side, we have the Hankook iON evo AS, the pioneer in North America as the first all-season tire specifically designed for electric vehicles. On the other, the newly launched Bridgestone Turanza EV, making waves since its debut in 2023.
This head-to-head battle promises to be a thrilling clash of innovation and performance, as these two giants vie for supremacy in delivering the ultimate driving experience for EV owners. Buckle up, because this is one tire comparison you won’t want to miss!
Table of Contents
Results: Hankook iON evo AS vs Bridgestone Turanza EV
Results below were taken from Tire Rack’s Testing EV Tires 2024 test. A total of 9 tires were tested on Tire Rack’s proving ground including a variety of different segment tires. The graph below shows the comparison between Hankook iON evo AS vs Bridgestone Turanza EV based on the relevant performance category. The Hankook iON evo AS was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
As both tires are categorized as all season tires, Tire Rack has planned the snow & ice in its testing portfolio. A detailed testing on snow including acceleration, braking & handling will be available only at the end of the 2024 winter season. The tire size of interest is a 235/40R19 which is a common tire size for Tesla Model 3. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle for this tire test is a 2023 Tesla Model 3 Performance.
Wet
In terms of wet performance, the Bridgestone Turanza EV outshines the Hankook iON evo AS. When it comes to wet braking from 50-0 mph, the Turanza EV stops in 102.10 feet, which is 2.5 feet shorter than the iON evo AS at 104.60 feet. Additionally, in wet handling, the Turanza EV completes a lap in 31.53 seconds, slightly faster than the iON evo AS, which clocks in at 31.91 seconds. This edge in wet conditions makes the Turanza EV a stronger performer in the rain.
iON evo AS:
During wet testing, the steering felt lighter than on dry roads but still maintained accuracy and precision. It was crucial to avoid combining braking or acceleration with turning to prevent the car from sliding or losing control, which could be risky for unprepared drivers in emergencies. The reduced traction also meant that braking needed to be planned earlier, leaving less room for mistakes.
Test driver feedback on iON evo AS
Turanza EV:
When performing emergency maneuvers in both dry and wet conditions, the traditional advice of slowing down and staying within the tire and vehicle’s capabilities proved essential here. In wet conditions, reduced traction, especially in the corners, led to a more slippery and challenging experience when pushing the limits.
Test driver feedback on Turanza EV
Turanza EV :
- +2% in wet braking
- +1% in wet handling (lap time)
Dry
In terms of dry performance, the Hankook iON evo AS has a clear advantage over the Bridgestone Turanza EV. For dry braking from 50-0 mph, the iON evo AS stops in 88.70 feet, which is 4.9 feet shorter than the Turanza EV’s 93.60 feet. Additionally, in dry handling, the iON evo AS completes a lap in 29.13 seconds, faster than the Turanza EV’s 29.82 seconds. This makes the iON evo AS the better performer in dry conditions.
iON evo AS:
On dry surfaces, the Hankook iON evo AS shed most of its wet condition issues, revealing impressive agility and strong braking performance. It handled smoothly and was much more forgiving, showcasing its true athletic potential.
Test driver feedback on iON evo AS
Turanza EV:
In dry conditions, the Turanza EV exhibited inconsistent traction, often transitioning from understeer to oversteer, resulting in drifting. Its braking performance also lagged, requiring more time and distance to be effective.
Test driver feedback on Turanza EV
Turanza EV :
- -5% in dry braking
- -2% in dry handling (lap time)
Power Consumption
When comparing power consumption, the Hankook iON evo AS stands out as the most efficient tire in the test. It consumes 263 watt-hours per mile, which is 13 watt-hours less than the Bridgestone Turanza EV’s 276 watt-hours per mile. Impressively, the iON evo AS even outperformed the original equipment (OE) tires of the Tesla Model Y, highlighting its superior efficiency.
Turanza EV :
- -5% in power consumption (efficiency)
UTQG ratings
Comparing the UTQG ratings, the Hankook iON evo AS has a tread wear rating of 600, while the Bridgestone Turanza EV has a rating of 500. Although we can’t directly compare these UTQG tread wear values, they suggest that the iON evo AS may have a longer lifespan. Both tires share identical traction and temperature ratings of A, indicating similar performance in these aspects.
| Brand | Tireline | Size | Tread Wear | Traction | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook | iON evo AS | All | 600 | A | A |
| Bridgestone | Turanza EV | All | 500 | A | A |
Price
In the 235/40R19 tire size, the Hankook iON evo AS costs $267, while the Bridgestone Turanza EV is priced at $291. This makes the Turanza EV 8% more expensive than the iON evo AS.
Tire size: 235/40R19
- iON evo AS : $267
- Turanza EV : $291
Difference: +8% more expensive for Turanza EV.
Summary
As a tire expert, I can confidently say that both the Hankook iON evo AS and Bridgestone Turanza EV offer distinct advantages for EV owners. The iON evo AS excels in dry performance and efficiency, making it a great choice for those seeking superior braking and handling along with lower power consumption. On the other hand, the Turanza EV shines in wet conditions, providing better traction and handling in the rain.
While each tire has its strengths, the choice ultimately depends on your specific driving needs and conditions. Stay tuned for our upcoming winter results, where we’ll compare these tires in snowy and icy conditions to see how they perform in the cold weather!
Dr Edwin Pang