Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2: In the ever-competitive arena of all-season tires, the introduction of Bridgestone’s Turanza All Season 6 in 2023 has sparked a thrilling rivalry with Hankook’s Kinergy 4S2. This match-up promises to be an epic showdown, pitting Bridgestone’s latest innovation against the renowned performance and reliability of Hankook’s Kinergy 4S2. With the Turanza All Season 6 boasting cutting-edge technology to enhance driving comfort, durability, and all-weather traction, it steps into the ring ready to challenge the Kinergy 4S2’s exceptional grip, fuel efficiency, and versatile weather adaptability.
This battle in the all-season segment is not just about tires; it’s a test of brand supremacy, technological advancement, and the quest to secure the title of the ultimate all-season champion. Gear up for a head-to-head that promises to redefine standards and elevate expectations in the all-season tire market!
Table of Contents
Results: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Results below were taken from the 2023 Auto Bild All Season Test. A whopping 35 tires were tested this time around with only 16 tires making it into the final round. The graph below shows the comparison between Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 based on the relevant performance category. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
Auto Bild did the full range of test including snow & the expensive wear test. The tire size of interest is a 225/45 R17 which is a common tire size for Volvo S60 & BMW 3 Series. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle of choice is a BMW 3 series.
Wet Showdown
When comparing the wet performances of the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2, it’s clear that the Bridgestone tire takes the lead in all tested conditions. In wet braking, the Turanza All Season 6 requires 45 meters to come to a stop from 100 km/h, while the Kinergy 4S2 takes 4.5 meters more, needing 49.5 meters to halt. This difference highlights the superior braking efficiency of the Bridgestone tire in wet conditions.
For wet handling, which measures the average speed maintained around a lap, the Turanza All Season 6 again outperforms the Kinergy 4S2. The Turanza maintains an average speed of 74.7 km/h, compared to the Kinergy 4S2’s 72.1 km/h, indicating better control and agility for the Bridgestone tire under wet conditions.
In the aquaplaning test, which assesses the tire’s ability to maintain traction and control at high speeds in wet conditions, the Turanza All Season 6 achieves a slipping speed of 79.8 km/h. The Kinergy 4S2, on the other hand, records a slightly lower speed of 78.6 km/h. This result suggests that the Bridgestone tire offers slightly better resistance to aquaplaning, ensuring a safer and more stable ride in heavy rain.
Overall, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 demonstrates superior wet performance across all tests compared to the Hankook Kinergy 4S2, offering drivers enhanced safety, control, and confidence on wet roads.
Kinergy 4S2 :
- -9% in wet braking
- -3% in wet handling
- -1% in aquaplaning
Snow
In the snow performance tests between the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2, the results are closely matched, showing both tires offer strong capabilities under snowy conditions.
Starting with snow braking, from 50 km/h to a complete stop, both the Turanza All Season 6 and the Kinergy 4S2 require exactly 23.1 meters. This parity indicates that both tires provide equally effective braking power on snow-covered roads, ensuring reliable stopping distances for drivers.
When it comes to snow traction, which measures the pulling force in Newtons, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 slightly edges out the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 with a force of 2660 N compared to 2639 N. This minimal difference of 21 N suggests that the Turanza All Season 6 offers a marginally better grip on snow, enhancing acceleration and uphill performance in winter conditions.
For snow handling, which looks at the average lap speed, the Turanza All Season 6 again performs slightly better than the Kinergy 4S2. The Bridgestone tire maintains an average speed of 57.6 km/h, while the Hankook tire is close behind at 57.3 km/h. This difference, though small, highlights the Turanza’s superior ability to navigate snowy tracks with slightly higher speed and confidence.
Overall, while the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 shows a slight advantage in traction and handling on snow, both tires demonstrate remarkably close performances in snow conditions, ensuring they are both reliable choices for winter driving.
Kinergy 4S2 :
- 0% in snow braking
- -1% in snow traction
- -1% in snow handling
Dry
In the dry performance category, comparing the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 to the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 reveals notable differences favoring the Bridgestone tire. For dry braking, where the distance required to stop from 100 km/h is measured, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 needs 38.5 meters to come to a complete stop. On the other hand, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 requires 41.3 meters, making the Bridgestone tire 2.8 meters more efficient in dry braking. This shorter stopping distance underlines the Turanza All Season 6’s superior braking capability on dry roads, offering enhanced safety and response.
When assessing dry handling, which calculates the average lap speed, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 again outperforms the Kinergy 4S2. The Turanza maintains an average speed of 88.8 km/h, compared to the Kinergy’s 87.8 km/h. This speed advantage, although seemingly small, signifies better handling and stability for the Bridgestone tire during dry conditions, allowing for a slightly faster and more controlled driving experience.
Overall, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 demonstrates a clear edge over the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 in dry conditions, with more efficient braking and higher speeds in handling tests, suggesting it’s a more favorable choice for drivers prioritizing performance on dry roads.
Kinergy 4S2 :
- -7% in dry braking
- -1% in dry handling
Wear
In the wear performance test, which measures the longevity of the tires in kilometers before they reach their wear limit, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 clearly outshines the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6. The Kinergy 4S2 boasts a remarkable durability, lasting up to 60,289 kilometers, significantly surpassing the Turanza All Season 6, which shows wear after 49,794 kilometers.
This difference of 10,495 kilometers marks the only test where the Kinergy 4S2 shines brighter than its Bridgestone counterpart, indicating superior long-term value and endurance. This standout performance in wear resistance suggests that for drivers prioritizing longevity and cost-effectiveness over the lifetime of their tires, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 presents a compelling advantage.
Kinergy 4S2 :
- +21% in mileage
Noise
In the exterior noise performance test, which evaluates the amount of noise generated by the tires at a standardized speed, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 exhibit almost identical results. The Turanza All Season 6 produces a noise level of 73.3 decibels, while the Kinergy 4S2 is slightly quieter, with a noise level of 73.1 decibels.
This marginal difference of just 0.2 decibels indicates that both tires offer a comparable level of noise comfort, with the Kinergy 4S2 having a slight edge in being the quieter of the two. For drivers for whom exterior noise is a crucial factor in selecting tires, both options present a similarly quiet ride, but the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 edges out as the marginally quieter choice, potentially offering a slightly more serene driving experience.
Kinergy 4S2 :
- ~0% in exterior noise (-0.2 dB)
Rolling Resistance & Fuel Consumption Showdown:
In the tests for rolling resistance and fuel consumption, which measure the efficiency and environmental impact of the tires, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 outperforms the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.
Rolling resistance, a critical factor in determining how much energy is needed to keep a tire moving, is lower for the Turanza All Season 6 at 7.86 N/kN compared to the Kinergy 4S2’s 8.24 N/kN. This difference signifies that the Bridgestone tire requires less energy to roll, translating to better fuel efficiency.
This efficiency is reflected in the fuel consumption rates: the Turanza All Season 6 achieves a lower fuel consumption of 5.46 liters per 100 kilometers, while the Kinergy 4S2 consumes more fuel at 5.74 liters per 100 kilometers. This difference underscores the Turanza All Season 6’s superior performance in terms of energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness in fuel usage.
Overall, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 demonstrates a clear advantage in both rolling resistance and fuel consumption, indicating it is the more eco-friendly and economical choice for drivers concerned with fuel efficiency and reducing environmental impact.
Kinergy 4S2 :
- -5% in rolling resistance
- -5% in fuel consumption
Price
In terms of pricing for the tire size 205/55 R16, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is positioned as the more budget-friendly option at €79, compared to the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, which is priced at €96. This makes the Kinergy 4S2 about 22% cheaper than the Turanza All Season 6, offering a significant cost saving for consumers looking for value in their tire purchase.
Tire size: 205/55 R16
Difference: -22% more cheaper for Kinergy 4S2.
Expert’s Perspective
As a tire expert, after thoroughly comparing the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 across various performance metrics, it’s clear that the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 emerges as the superior tire. Its standout performance in wet, dry, and snow conditions, coupled with its lower rolling resistance and fuel consumption, showcases its exceptional versatility and efficiency. The Turanza All Season 6 not only offers enhanced safety and control but also demonstrates Bridgestone’s commitment to innovation and environmental responsibility.
However, it’s important to note a significant drawback in terms of mileage. Despite its superior performance, the Turanza All Season 6 falls short in longevity compared to the Kinergy 4S2, which may affect long-term value and cost-effectiveness for some drivers. The Kinergy 4S2’s advantage in wear indicates that it could last longer, potentially offering a better return on investment over time.
In conclusion, while the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stands out as the clear winner in performance, those prioritizing tire longevity and mileage may want to consider the trade-offs. The choice ultimately depends on what you value most in a tire: superior performance and safety features, or longer wear and potentially greater overall value.
Dr Edwin Pang