Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport: Introducing a thrilling face-off between two industry-leading titans in the world of performance tires: the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, launched in 2021, and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport, which made its debut in 2020. This is not merely a competition; it’s a showcase of innovation, engineering prowess, and a quest for ultimate performance.
On one side, we have the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, a tire that boasts state-of-the-art Dry Contact Plus technology. This revolutionary feature enables the tire’s contact patch to adapt to both the driver’s style and road surface, resulting in an exceptional dry performance. Furthermore, with its Wet Braking Pro technology, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 introduces a new resin that increases micro-contact with the road, drastically improving wet braking. But the innovation doesn’t stop there; the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is fully prepared for the future with its Electric Vehicle readiness. This tire reduces rolling resistance and noise emissions, making it the perfect fit for the rapidly growing EV market.
On the other side of the ring stands the Bridgestone Potenza Sport, a tire that has been delivering stellar performance since its launch in 2020. While the specific features of the Potenza Sport are not mentioned, it is widely recognized for its superior handling and control, exceptional responsiveness, and reliable performance under both dry and wet conditions. Bridgestone has a well-earned reputation for quality and performance, and the Potenza Sport is no exception.
As these two heavyweights face off, one thing is certain: both the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport are pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in tire technology. It’s not just a battle; it’s a celebration of innovation, performance, and the spirit of competition. Brace yourselves for a showdown like no other in the tire industry.
Table of Contents
Results
Results below were taken from the 2023 Tyre Reviews Performance Tyre Test which includes 6 top tires in the market. The graph below shows the comparison between Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport based on the relevant performance category. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark. Note that for subjective evaluation, we equate 1 point as 5%. Hence for example if tire A is graded 7 while tire B is graded 6, A is better than B by 5%.
The tire size of interest for the test is a 225/40 R18 which is a common tire size for Audi A3 Sedan & Mercedes-Benz Slc 200. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information.
Dry
When comparing the dry performance of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport, both tires reveal strong results, although they excel in different areas. Starting with dry braking, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 comes to a stop from speed at a distance of 33 meters, slightly shorter than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport, which halts at 33.2 meters. The mere difference of 0.2 meters suggests that both tire’s braking performance in dry conditions were very close with Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 having a slight advantage.
Moving on to dry handling lap times, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport completes the course in a slightly quicker time of 73.71 seconds, compared to the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, which takes 73.92 seconds. While the difference is small, the Bridgestone tire offers a slight edge when it comes to speed and agility in dry conditions. Lastly, the subjective dry handling category, which takes into account the overall feel and responsiveness of the tires from a driver’s perspective, sees both tires scoring impressively. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 earns the maximum score of 10 points, while the Bridgestone Potenza Sport only managed 9.2 points in this regard.
Dry Summary
In conclusion, both the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport deliver exceptional dry performance. While the Goodyear tire provides a slight advantage in dry braking, the Bridgestone tire edges ahead in dry handling lap times. However, both tires achieve the maximum score in subjective dry handling, indicating excellent overall dry performance. Your final choice may depend on your specific driving style and requirements.
Potenza Sport:
- -0.6% in dry braking
- +0.3% in dry handling (lap times)
- -4% in dry handling (subjective)
Wet
Analyzing the wet performance of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport, the data reveals interesting insights. Each tire was put through stringent tests, including Wet Braking, Wet Braking – Cool, Wet Braking – Worn, Wet Handling, Subj. Wet Handling, Straight Aqua, and Curved Aquaplaning.
In the Wet Braking category, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stops at 28.6 meters, while the Bridgestone Potenza Sport halts at a slightly shorter distance of 28.3 meters. It’s a close competition, but the Bridgestone edges ahead in this test. When the temperature drops, the Wet Braking – Cool test results are reversed. The Goodyear tire halts at 31.4 meters, slightly ahead of the Bridgestone tire at 31.5 meters. This suggests that Goodyear’s performance might be more consistent across different temperatures, an important factor given the varying weather conditions drivers often face.
In the Wet Handling test, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 outperforms the Bridgestone Potenza Sport. The former completes the course in 91.97 seconds, whereas the latter finishes in 91.2 seconds. Despite the close competition, the Goodyear tire offers slightly better handling in wet conditions. When we move to subjective wet handling, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores the maximum of 10 points, while the Bridgestone Potenza Sport secures 9.5 points. This suggests that drivers might find the Goodyear tire more comfortable or responsive under wet conditions.
In the aquaplaning tests (Straight Aqua and Curved Aquaplaning), the Bridgestone Potenza Sport shows a slightly better performance. It maintains a speed of 78.3 Km/H in the Straight Aqua test and 5.7 m/sec² in the Curved Aquaplaning test, while the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 manages 79 Km/H and 6.25 m/sec², respectively. This indicates the Goodyear tire’s superior resistance to aquaplaning.
Wet Summary
In conclusion, both the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport offer commendable performances under wet conditions, with each tire excelling in different areas. Your choice might ultimately come down to your specific driving conditions and personal preferences.
Potenza Sport:
- +1.1% in wet braking
- -0.3% in wet braking (cool)
- +0.8% in wet handling (lap speed)
- -2.5% in wet handling (subjective)
- -0.9% in straight aquaplaning
- -8.8% in curved aquaplaning
Noise & Comfort
When examining the noise and comfort results for the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport, it’s important to note that in the Ultra High Performance (UHP) segment, comfort is often a trade-off for enhanced handling performance. However, let’s see how these two tires manage this balance.
Starting with noise levels, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 registers a slightly higher noise level at 72.4 dB, compared to the Bridgestone Potenza Sport which stands at 72.2 dB. Although the difference is minimal, the Bridgestone tire might offer a slightly quieter ride, contributing to overall comfort during the journey.
Looking at subjective comfort, which considers the overall feel and ride quality from the driver’s perspective, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores the maximum of 10 points. On the other hand, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport earns 9.5 points in this category. This suggests that drivers might find the ride quality of the Goodyear tire more comfortable, despite the handling performance trade-off common in the UHP segment.
In conclusion, both the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport show strong results in terms of noise and comfort. While the Goodyear tire offers a higher subjective comfort, the Bridgestone tire also delivers a slight advantage when it comes to exterior noise. Your final choice might depend on your individual preference for noise levels and comfort, as well as the handling performance you expect from a tire in the UHP segment.
Potenza Sport:
- +0.3% in exterior noise (-0.2 dB)
- -2.5% in comfort (subjective)
Rolling Resistance
When it comes to rolling resistance, which plays a significant role in fuel efficiency, only Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 showed competitive values. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 registers a rolling resistance value of 8.6 N/kN, while the Bridgestone Potenza Sport records a much higher rolling resistance value at 10.3 N/kN. A lower rolling resistance value is generally more desirable as it means the tire requires less energy to roll, leading to better fuel efficiency.
In conclusion, while the huge differences, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 offers a much better rolling resistance, which could potentially lead to improved fuel efficiency over time. This also indicates Goodyear’s commitments in combining performance with efficiency.
Potenza Sport:
- -16.5% in rolling resistance
Wear
Tire wear and abrasion are key factors when considering the longevity of a tire and its environmental impact. As tires wear, they release microplastics into the environment, which can have detrimental effects on ecosystems. Moreover, with the upcoming EURO 7 limit on tire particle wear, these factors become increasingly important.
Examining the data, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 demonstrates a wear distance of 26,053 Km, outperforming the Bridgestone Potenza Sport which registers a wear distance of 20,459 Km. This suggests that the Goodyear tire may have a longer lifespan, reducing the frequency of tire changes and thus, its environmental impact.
In terms of abrasion, both tires exhibit commendable results. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 shows an abrasion rate of 72.4 mg/km/t, while the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has a slightly better rate of 72.3 mg/km/t. Despite the wear results being less favorable for the Bridgestone tire, its comparable abrasion rate indicates that it effectively manages material loss while in use. However, it’s important to note that the Bridgestone Potenza Sport starts at slightly lower tread depth of 5.8mm compared to the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 at 5.9mm.
Wear Summary
In conclusion, while both tires demonstrate good abrasion rates, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 shows a more favorable wear result, which could lead to longer tire life and potentially lower environmental impact, an important consideration in the face of incoming regulations such as the EURO 7 limit.
Potenza Sport:
- -21.5% in mileage
- +0.1% in abrasion
Price
When it comes to the price difference for the 225/40 R18 tire size, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is priced at €93, making it a more affordable option compared to the Bridgestone Potenza Sport, which is priced at €103. This €10 difference might seem small, but for drivers considering the overall costs of vehicle maintenance and operation, every euro counts. The lower price of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, combined with its strong performance across various categories, makes it an appealing option for cost-conscious customers.
However, the final choice between these two premium tires should not solely be based on price. It’s crucial to consider their respective performances in areas such as dry and wet handling, noise and comfort, rolling resistance, and wear and abrasion, as these factors can significantly influence the driving experience and the tire’s lifespan.
Tire size: 225/40 R18
Potenza Sport: €103
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: €93
Difference: +10% more expensive for Potenza Sport.
Summary
In conclusion, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport both offer high-quality performance and features that make them strong contenders in the Ultra High Performance tire segment.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 excels in subjective wet/dry handling, offering a slightly quieter ride and superior comfort compared to its competitor. It also shows better wear results and much better better rolling resistance, which could translate to improved fuel efficiency and a longer tire lifespan. Additionally, at a price of €93, it offers a more affordable option without compromising on performance.
On the other hand, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stands out in areas such as dry & wet handling lap times. Despite the slightly higher price of €103, it offers a competitive abrasion rate and a solid performance across various parameters.
Ultimately, the choice between these two tires will depend on your specific driving requirements, environmental considerations, and budget. Both tires exhibit top-tier performance, making them excellent choices for drivers seeking a balance of comfort, efficiency, and superior handling.