Michelin Primacy 5 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 : In the world of premium touring tyres, two heavyweights are going head-to-head this season. On one side is the all-new Michelin Primacy 5, Michelin’s latest answer to drivers demanding comfort and confidence mile after mile. On the other, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, a seasoned contender that’s built a reputation for everyday refinement and reliable grip. It’s a classic clash of new tech versus proven performance — the ultimate battle for the crown in the grand touring tyre arena.
Table of Contents
Results: Michelin Primacy 5 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
The results presented here are from the ADAC 2026 Summer Tire Test, where 10 of the best summer tire models were selected. The accompanying graph provides a side-by-side comparison of the Michelin Primacy 5 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 across various performance categories, with the Michelin Primacy 5 serving as the benchmark at 100%.
The tire size of interest is the 225/50R17 tire size, a popular choice for vehicles like the Honda Accord & BMW 3 series. For further insights into various tire sizes, feel free to consult our latest tire size table. The tests were conducted using a Audi A4 as the test vehicle.
Wet
In wet braking, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 stops 1.4 meters shorter than the Michelin Primacy 5, which is about a 4.5% advantage in braking distance. This gives the Goodyear a clear edge in emergency stopping performance on wet roads. However, in straight-line aquaplaning, the Michelin Primacy 5 holds on 0.8 km/h longer than the Goodyear, translating to about a 1.0% advantage in resisting water lift at higher speeds.
Overall, the Goodyear shows stronger wet braking performance, while the Michelin offers slightly better aquaplaning resistance — making this a close wet battle with each tire taking a different strength.
EfficientGrip Performance 2 :
- +4% in wet braking
- -1% in aquaplaning
Dry
In dry braking, both the Michelin Primacy 5 and the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 stop in exactly 36.3 meters. That means there is 0 meter difference between them, translating to a 0% performance gap.
In pure dry emergency braking, they are evenly matched, delivering identical stopping performance.
EfficientGrip Performance 2 :
- ~0% in dry braking
Wear
In wear mileage, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 lasts 1,800 km longer than the Michelin Primacy 5, which is about a 3.0% advantage in total lifespan. However, in abrasion rate, the Michelin wears down 8 mg/km/t less than the Goodyear, translating to roughly a 13.0% lower abrasion rate. This indicates the Michelin loses less rubber per kilometer despite the slightly shorter overall projected mileage.
Overall, the Goodyear shows a small edge in total distance potential, while the Michelin demonstrates a more controlled and efficient wear pattern.
EfficientGrip Performance 2 :
- +3% in mileage
- -13% in abrasion
Fuel Consumption
In fuel consumption, the Michelin Primacy 5 uses 0.1 l/100 km less than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, which translates to about a 2.0% advantage in efficiency. The difference is small in real-world terms, but the Michelin holds a slight edge in rolling efficiency, helping drivers save a bit more fuel over time.
EfficientGrip Performance 2 :
- -2% in fuel consumption
Price
In size 225/50R17, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is €6 cheaper than the Michelin Primacy 5, which makes it about 5% more affordable.
Tire size: 225/50 R17
- Primacy 5 : € 132
- EfficientGrip Performance 2 : € 126
Difference: -5% cheaper for EfficientGrip Performance 2
Summary
From my perspective as a tire engineer, both tires are strong in slightly different ways. The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 stands out with shorter wet braking and slightly longer projected mileage, while also being a bit more affordable upfront. It delivers a very balanced, value-focused touring package.
On the other hand, the Michelin Primacy 5 impresses with lower abrasion wear and slightly better fuel efficiency, along with marginally stronger aquaplaning resistance. It feels engineered for long-term consistency and controlled performance over time.
If you prioritize sharper wet stopping and cost efficiency, the Goodyear makes a strong case. If you value efficiency, refined wear behavior, and overall engineering balance, the Michelin is equally compelling.
Dr Edwin Pang