Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S: In this ultimate tire showdown, we have the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, launched in 2020, versus the brand-new Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S, released in 2024. This battle pits a renowned replacement ultra-high performance (UHP) all-season tire against a cutting-edge, EV-specific UHP all-season tire. Which will come out on top? Is an EV-specific tire truly necessary, or can a top-tier UHP all-season tire hold its own? Let’s find out!
Table of Contents
Results: Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S
Results below were taken from Tire Rack’s Testing EV Tires 2024 test. A total of 9 tires were tested on Tire Rack’s proving ground including a variety of different segment tires. The graph below shows the comparison between Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S based on the relevant performance category. The Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
As both tires are categorized as all season tires, Tire Rack has planned the snow & ice in its testing portfolio. A detailed testing on snow including acceleration, braking & handling will be available only at the end of the 2024 winter season. The tire size of interest is a 235/40R19 which is a common tire size for Tesla Model 3. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle for this tire test is a 2023 Tesla Model 3 Performance.
Wet
When it comes to wet performance, the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 outperforms the Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S. In wet braking tests from 50 mph, the Michelin stops in 92.3 feet, while the Yokohama takes longer, stopping in 102.1 feet—a difference of nearly 10 feet. For wet handling, the Michelin also leads with a lap time of 30.46 seconds, compared to the Yokohama’s 32.05 seconds, showcasing the Michelin’s superior grip and control in wet conditions.
Pilot Sport All Season 4:
In wet conditions, the tire demonstrated excellent grip with powerful braking and solid cornering traction, although it took a bit longer to recover from understeer.
Test driver feedback on Pilot Sport All Season 4
ADVAN Sport EV A/S:
On wet surfaces, the dynamics shifted considerably. While the steering remained responsive, traction decreased sharply with water on the road. Maintaining control required constant attention to avoid drifting, and entering corners too quickly led to inevitable understeer. Although our testers never lost control, the difference in performance was significant.
Test driver feedback on ADVAN Sport EV A/S
ADVAN Sport EV A/S :
- -10% in wet braking
- -5% in wet handling (lap time)
Dry
In dry performance tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 outshines the Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S. For dry braking from 50 mph to a stop, the Michelin stops in 83.7 feet, while the Yokohama takes longer, stopping in 87.4 feet—a difference of nearly 4 feet. In terms of dry handling, the Michelin completes the lap in 29.09 seconds, faster than the Yokohama’s 29.96 seconds, highlighting the Michelin’s superior grip and agility on dry roads.
Pilot Sport All Season 4:
In dry conditions, the tire showed good athletic qualities with responsive steering. However, it tended to oversteer or understeer when pushed too hard. Braking was solid, with balanced mid-corner turn-in and strong lateral traction, providing a well-rounded handling experience.
Test driver feedback on Pilot Sport All Season 4
ADVAN Sport EV A/S:
On dry surfaces, the tire felt naturally responsive with aggressive steering, easily handling unexpected mid-corner adjustments. However, after several rapid directional changes, such as in a slalom, the steering response began to lag. Both steering and overall traction were balanced, but neither stood out as particularly impressive.
Test driver feedback on ProContact RX (T1)
ADVAN Sport EV A/S :
- -4% in dry braking
- -3% in dry handling (lap time)
Power Consumption
When it comes to power consumption, the Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S is more efficient than the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4. The Yokohama uses 274 Wh/mi, whereas the Michelin consumes more at 292 Wh/mi. This efficiency advantage for the Yokohama comes with a trade-off: while it has lower rolling resistance and better energy efficiency, the Michelin offers superior wet braking performance.
ADVAN Sport EV A/S :
- +7% in power consumption (efficiency)
UTQG ratings
Based on the UTQG values, the Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S is likely to have a higher expected mileage compared to the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4. The Yokohama has a tread wear rating of 580, while the Michelin’s rating is 540. Additionally, the Yokohama comes with a 55,000-mile warranty and a tread depth of 11/32 inches, compared to the Michelin’s 45,000-mile warranty and 10/32 inches tread depth. While the Michelin boasts a higher traction rating (AA vs. A), these factors suggest that the Yokohama may last longer overall.
| Brand | Tireline | Size | Tread Wear | Traction | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin | Pilot Sport All Season 4 | All | 540 | AA | A |
| Yokohama | ADVAN Sport EV A/S | All | 580 | A | A |
Price
We were surprised to find that the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 is priced significantly cheaper than the Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S. For the tire size 235/40R19, the Michelin costs $258, while the Yokohama is priced at $271, making the Yokohama about 5% more expensive.
Tire size: 235/40R19
- Pilot Sport All Season 4 : $258
- ADVAN Sport EV A/S : $271
Difference: +5% more expensive for ADVAN Sport EV A/S.
Summary
As a tire expert, I can conclude that both the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 and the Yokohama ADVAN Sport EV A/S have their distinct advantages. The Michelin excels in safety, offering superior wet and dry braking performance, and exceptional handling, making it a great choice for those prioritizing maximum grip and control in various conditions. On the other hand, the Yokohama shines in power consumption, with lower rolling resistance and higher efficiency, which is crucial for electric vehicles looking to maximize range.
While the Michelin is surprisingly more affordable, the Yokohama’s expected higher mileage and efficiency present a compelling case for EV owners. Ultimately, the choice comes down to what you value more: safety and performance with the Michelin, or efficiency and longevity with the Yokohama.
Dr Edwin Pang