Skip to Content

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza 6: It’s a battle of eco-focused heavyweights: the Michelin e.Primacy, a dedicated EV tire built for maximum efficiency and longevity, takes on the Bridgestone Turanza 6, a next-gen touring tire engineered with CO₂ reduction in mind. One is purpose-built for the electric future, the other optimized for sustainability across a broad range of vehicles. Which tire truly delivers when it comes to real-world performance and lasting impact? Let’s find out.

Results: Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

The results presented here are from the 2025 Auto & Motor Sport Sustainable Tire Test, where 6 of the best sustainable tire models were selected from the market. The accompanying graph provides a side-by-side comparison of the Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza 6 across various performance categories, with the Michelin e.Primacy serving as the benchmark at 100%.

The tire size of interest is the 215/55R17 tire size, a popular choice for vehicles like the Honda HRV. For further insights into various tire sizes, feel free to consult our latest tire size table. The tests were conducted using a standard Audi Q2 as the test vehicle.

Testing Vehicle of Choice: Audi Q2 on wet handling action
Testing Vehicle of Choice: Audi Q2 on wet handling action

Wet

In wet braking, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 stops 2.3 meters shorter than the Michelin e.Primacy, a 7% advantage. Around the wet handling track, the Turanza 6 is faster by 2.6 km/h, giving it a 3% edge. In straight-line aquaplaning resistance, the Turanza 6 again leads, managing 4.4 km/h more than the e.Primacy, which translates to a 6% difference. Overall, the Turanza 6 clearly outperforms the e.Primacy in wet conditions.

Turanza 6 :

  • +7% in wet braking
  • +3% in wet handling
  • +6% in aquaplaning

Dry

In dry braking, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 stops 1.1 meters shorter than the Michelin e.Primacy, giving it a 3% advantage. On the dry handling track, the Turanza 6 is slightly quicker, with a 0.7 km/h lead over the e.Primacy, which works out to a 1% difference. While the gap isn’t huge, the Turanza 6 still comes out ahead in dry performance.

Turanza 6 :

  • +3% in dry braking
  • +1% in dry handling

Wear

Comparing these tires without factoring in wear doesn’t give the full picture, as tire longevity plays a crucial role in overall CO₂ emissions over time. From existing tests, we know the e.Primacy outlasts Michelin Primacy 4+ by about 17%, while Primacy 4+ in turn outlasts the Bridgestone Turanza 6 by about 13%. By combining these ratios, we estimate the e.Primacy would likely deliver about 32% more mileage than Turanza 6, illustrating e.Primacy’s notable durability advantage.

However, that extra mileage and its class-leading rolling resistance come at a cost—wet performance, where the Turanza 6 holds a clear lead in braking, handling, and aquaplaning resistance. It’s the classic trade-off: the e.Primacy prioritizes efficiency and lifespan, while the Turanza 6 delivers better safety in the wet.

Turanza 6 :

  • -32% in mileage

Noise

In terms of noise, the Michelin e.Primacy is noticeably quieter, producing 2.1 dB less than the Bridgestone Turanza 6, which amounts to a 3% reduction. This makes the e.Primacy the more refined choice for cabin comfort.

Turanza 6 :

  • -3% in exterior noise (+2.1 dB)

Rolling Resistance

When it comes to rolling resistance, the Michelin e.Primacy excels with a value of 5.7 N/kN, which is 1.1 N/kN lower than the Bridgestone Turanza 6. That’s a 16% advantage in efficiency, making the e.Primacy the better option for reducing energy consumption and boosting range.

Turanza 6 :

  • -16% in rolling resistance

Price

For the 215/55 R17 size, the Michelin e.Primacy is priced at €165, while the Bridgestone Turanza 6 comes in at €133. That makes the Turanza 6 a significant 24% cheaper, offering strong value—especially when considering its superior wet performance.

Tire size: 215/55 R17

Difference: -24% more cheaper for Turanza 6.

Summary

As a tire expert, I see clear strengths in both options. The Michelin e.Primacy stands out with its exceptional mileage and best-in-class rolling resistance, making it ideal for drivers focused on efficiency and long-term value—especially for EVs. On the other hand, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 delivers noticeably better wet and dry grip, plus a lower price, making it the safer and more budget-friendly choice for everyday conditions. Your decision ultimately depends on whether you value efficiency and longevity or confident wet performance at a lower cost.

Dr Edwin Pang

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]