Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2: Michelin has long dominated the all-season 3 Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) segment since the launch of its CrossClimate range in 2015, setting the standard for all-weather performance. Now, Continental’s second brand, Uniroyal, is stepping into the ring with the AllSeasonExpert 2. Can this challenger bring the all-season fight to Michelin’s CrossClimate 2 and disrupt its reign?
Table of Contents
Results: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
Results below were taken from the 2024 ADAC All Season Test. There were 16 tires tested fully this time around which. The graph below shows the comparison between Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 based on the relevant performance category. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
ADAC did the full range of test including snow, ice & the expensive wear test. The tire size of interest is a 205/55R16 which is a common tire size for Toyota Corolla Altis. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle of choice is a Volkswagen Golf.
Wet
In wet braking, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stops in 34.8 meters, just 0.2 meters shorter than the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2, which takes 35 meters. In straight-line aquaplaning, however, Uniroyal edges ahead, resisting aquaplaning at 82.3 km/h compared to Michelin’s 81 km/h.
AllSeasonExpert 2 :
- -1% in wet braking
- +2% in aquaplaning
Snow
In snow performance, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 shows a slight advantage in traction, delivering 225.5 Newtons compared to the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2’s 217.6 Newtons, providing better grip on snowy roads. However, in snow braking, the Uniroyal stops quicker, taking 10.7 meters to come to a halt, which is 0.4 meters shorter than the Michelin’s 11.1 meters. While Michelin excels in traction, Uniroyal edges ahead in braking on snow.
AllSeasonExpert 2 :
- +4% in snow braking
- -4% in snow traction
Ice
On ice, the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 outperforms the Michelin CrossClimate 2 in ice braking, stopping in 18.5 meters, which is 1.3 meters shorter than Michelin’s 19.8 meters. This difference highlights Uniroyal’s stronger performance in icy conditions compared to Michelin.
AllSeasonExpert 2 :
- +7% in ice braking
Wear
The Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 delivers a higher mileage of 48,000 km compared to the Michelin CrossClimate 2’s 44,000 km, but this comes with a noticeable difference in abrasion rates. With an abrasion rate of 71 mg/km/t for Uniroyal versus 52 mg/km/t for Michelin, it’s clear that the AllSeasonExpert 2 wears faster. This difference is partly due to the higher starting tread depth of the AllSeasonExpert 2, which measures 8.8mm compared to the CrossClimate 2’s 6.7mm.
AllSeasonExpert 2 :
- +9% in mileage
- -27% in abrasion
Dry
In dry performance, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 significantly outperforms the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 in braking. The CrossClimate 2 stops in 39.5 meters, which is a substantial 7.1 meters shorter than the 46.6 meters needed by the AllSeasonExpert 2. This difference can be attributed partially to the Michelin’s lower starting tread depth of 6.7mm, which enhances dry braking efficiency compared to the Uniroyal’s deeper 8.8mm tread.
AllSeasonExpert 2 :
- -15% in dry braking
Noise
The exterior noise levels of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 are quite similar, with only a slight difference between them. The CrossClimate 2 registers at 71.1 dB, just 0.3 dB quieter than the AllSeasonExpert 2’s 71.4 dB. This small variation indicates that both tires offer comparable noise levels on the road.
AllSeasonExpert 2 :
- ~0% in exterior noise (+0.3 dB)
Fuel Consumption:
The fuel consumption performance of both the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 is identical, with each tire achieving 5.3 liters per 100 km. This indicates that both tires offer the same level of fuel efficiency, with no noticeable difference between them.
AllSeasonExpert 2 :
- ~0% in fuel consumption
Price
For the 205/55R16 size, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is priced at €107, while the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 costs €66. This results in a significant price difference, with the AllSeasonExpert 2 being 40% cheaper. The CrossClimate 2 sits in the premium segment, justifying its higher cost, whereas the AllSeasonExpert 2 offers a more budget-friendly option in the quality segment.
Tire size: 205/55R16
Difference: -40% more cheaper for AllSeasonExpert 2.
Conclusion
From an expert’s perspective, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 serve different purposes in the all-season tire market. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 clearly excels in dry braking and offers a lower abrasion rate. On the other hand, the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2, with its deeper tread, delivers slightly better snow, ice braking, mileage and comes at a significantly lower price, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious drivers. However, it has higher abrasion rates and longer dry braking distances.
Dr Edwin Pang