Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage All Season: The Michelin CrossClimate 2 and BFGoodrich Advantage All Season are both part of the Michelin family, but they represent two different approaches in the all-season tire market. Launched in 2020, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has dominated the all-season segment for the past three years with its superior performance across various conditions. Meanwhile, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season, launched in 2022, brings a fresh challenge to the table. So, how do these two Michelin-owned contenders stack up against each other? This internal battle between the established champion and the ambitious newcomer is bound to be thrilling—let’s see who comes out on top!
Table of Contents
Results: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
Results below were taken from the 2023 Auto Bild All Season Test. A whopping 35 tires were tested this time around with only 16 tires making it into the final round. The graph below shows the comparison between Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage All Season based on the relevant performance category. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
Auto Bild did the full range of test including snow & the expensive wear test. The tire size of interest is a 225/45 R17 which is a common tire size for Volvo S60 & BMW 3 Series. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle of choice is a BMW 3 series.
Wet Showdown
In wet braking, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stops slightly shorter than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season, with a difference of 0.4 meters between them. When it comes to wet handling, the CrossClimate 2 has a slight edge with an average lap speed of 72.7 km/h compared to the Advantage All Season’s 72 km/h. However, in straight-line aquaplaning resistance, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season takes the lead, maintaining grip until 80.4 km/h, which is 1.4 km/h higher than the Michelin CrossClimate 2’s 79 km/h.
Advantage All Season :
- -1% in wet braking
- -1% in wet handling
- +2% in aquaplaning
Snow
In snow braking, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season slightly outperforms the Michelin CrossClimate 2, stopping 0.1 meters shorter at 22.9 meters. However, for snow traction, the CrossClimate 2 pulls ahead with a force of 2765 N compared to the Advantage All Season’s 2713 N. When it comes to snow handling, the CrossClimate 2 also has a slight advantage, achieving an average speed of 58.1 km/h, while the Advantage All Season trails at 57.5 km/h.
Advantage All Season :
- ~0% in snow braking
- -2% in snow traction
- -1% in snow handling
Wear
The mileage performance between the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and BFGoodrich Advantage All Season shows the most significant difference between these two siblings. The CrossClimate 2 far outlasts the Advantage All Season, delivering a remarkable 57,046 km compared to just 40,317 km for the BFGoodrich. This difference of over 16,700 km highlights the superior wear resistance of the CrossClimate 2, making it a standout in terms of longevity.
Advantage All Season :
- -29% in mileage
Dry
In dry braking, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 performs better than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season, stopping 1.2 meters shorter at 37.7 meters compared to 38.9 meters for the Advantage All Season. For dry handling, the CrossClimate 2 also takes the lead with an average speed of 89.2 km/h, which is 1 km/h faster than the 88.2 km/h achieved by the Advantage All Season.
Advantage All Season :
- -3% in dry braking
- -1% in dry handling
Noise
In terms of exterior noise performance, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is slightly quieter than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season, producing 72.6 dB compared to the Advantage All Season’s 73 dB. This 0.4 dB difference gives the CrossClimate 2 a marginal edge in delivering a quieter ride.
Advantage All Season :
- -1% in exterior noise (+0.4 dB)
Rolling Resistance
In rolling resistance performance, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and BFGoodrich Advantage All Season are nearly identical. The CrossClimate 2 has a slightly lower rolling resistance at 7.69 N/kN, just 0.01 N/kN better than the Advantage All Season’s 7.7 N/kN. This small difference shows that both tires offer very similar efficiency in terms of rolling resistance.
Advantage All Season :
- ~0% in rolling resistance
Price
In the 205/55 R16 size, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is priced at €110, while the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season costs €91. This makes the Advantage All Season about 20% cheaper. Michelin’s pricing reflects its strategy to differentiate these two tires, positioning the CrossClimate 2 as a premium offering with advanced performance benefits, while the Advantage All Season is positioned as a more budget-friendly alternative within the Michelin family.
Tire size: 205/55 R16
Difference: -20% cheaper for Advantage All Season
Expert’s Perspective
As a tire expert, it’s intriguing to see how Michelin positions the CrossClimate 2 and BFGoodrich Advantage All Season within its lineup. The CrossClimate 2 is aimed at those seeking top-tier all-season performance, with slight advantages in wet and dry. However, the performance differences between these two tires are quite close in most areas, making the real standout factor their mileage. The CrossClimate 2 lasts over 16,700 km more than the Advantage All Season, highlighting its superior wear resistance. This significant difference in longevity sets the CrossClimate 2 apart, offering excellent value for those who prioritize durability and long-term performance.
Dr Edwin Pang