Hankook iON evo AS vs Goodyear ElectricDrive 2: In the thrilling arena of all-season tires for electric vehicles, two titans are vying for supremacy in North America: the newly unveiled Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 and the established Hankook iON evo AS. Launched in 2024, the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 promises to set new benchmarks with its cutting-edge technology tailored for EVs, while the Hankook iON evo AS, which debuted in 2022, has already garnered a reputation for exceptional performance and durability.
This showdown is the most anticipated clash in the EV-specific segment, as these two powerhouses battle it out to determine which will reign supreme on the road. Buckle up for the ultimate face-off between the fresh innovation of Goodyear and the proven prowess of Hankook!
Table of Contents
Results: Hankook iON evo AS vs Goodyear ElectricDrive 2
Results below were taken from Tire Rack’s Testing EV Tires 2024 test. A total of 9 tires were tested on Tire Rack’s proving ground including a variety of different segment tires. The graph below shows the comparison between Hankook iON evo AS vs Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 based on the relevant performance category. The Hankook iON evo AS was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
As both tires are categorized as all season tires, Tire Rack has planned the snow & ice in its testing portfolio. A detailed testing on snow including acceleration, braking & handling will be available only at the end of the 2024 winter season. The tire size of interest is a 235/40R19 which is a common tire size for Tesla Model 3. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle for this tire test is a 2023 Tesla Model 3 Performance.
Wet
When comparing the wet performances of the Hankook iON evo AS and the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2, the Goodyear tire takes a slight edge. In wet braking tests, the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 stops at 103 feet from 50 mph, outperforming the Hankook iON evo AS, which takes 104.6 feet— a difference of 1.6 feet. This marginally shorter stopping distance can be crucial in emergency situations.
In wet handling, the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 continues to lead, completing a lap in 31.55 seconds, while the Hankook iON evo AS takes 31.91 seconds. This means the Goodyear tire handles wet conditions a fraction of a second faster, demonstrating superior grip and control on slick surfaces. Together, these small advantages make the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 a formidable contender in wet conditions.
iON evo AS:
During wet testing, the steering felt lighter than on dry roads but still maintained accuracy and precision. It was crucial to avoid combining braking or acceleration with turning to prevent the car from sliding or losing control, which could be risky for unprepared drivers in emergencies. The reduced traction also meant that braking needed to be planned earlier, leaving less room for mistakes.
Test driver feedback on iON evo AS
ElectricDrive 2:
The steering of the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 is well-balanced, responsive, and precise. At higher speeds, it stays stable and requires the right amount of effort to change direction. However, in emergency wet conditions, while the steering remains confident, it doesn’t always match the tire’s actual traction. This mismatch can lead to oversteer and cause the rear to slide out, despite the tire’s generally good grip.
Test driver feedback on ElectricDrive 2
ElectricDrive 2 :
- +2% in wet braking
- +1% in wet handling (lap time)
Dry
In dry conditions, the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 and the Hankook iON evo AS are closely matched. For dry braking, the Goodyear stops slightly faster, taking 88.4 feet from 50 mph compared to the Hankook’s 88.7 feet, a minimal 0.3-foot difference.
However, in dry handling, the Hankook iON evo AS shows its strength, completing a lap in 29.13 seconds, outperforming the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2, which takes 29.64 seconds. This means the Hankook is 0.51 seconds faster around the track, highlighting its superior grip and agility on dry surfaces. Overall, while Goodyear brakes slightly better, Hankook takes the lead in handling performance on dry roads.
iON evo AS:
On dry surfaces, the Hankook iON evo AS shed most of its wet condition issues, revealing impressive agility and strong braking performance. It handled smoothly and was much more forgiving, showcasing its true athletic potential.
Test driver feedback on iON evo AS
ElectricDrive 2:
In dry conditions, the tire’s problems became more pronounced. It struggled with sharp turns and quick direction changes, often feeling clumsy and unrefined.
Test driver feedback on ElectricDrive 2
ElectricDrive 2 :
- ~0% in dry braking
- -2% in dry handling (lap time)
Power Consumption
When it comes to power consumption, the Hankook iON evo AS is more efficient than the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2. The Hankook uses 263 watt-hours per mile, while the Goodyear consumes 274 watt-hours per mile, making the Hankook 11 watt-hours per mile more efficient.
This difference in rolling resistance directly impacts battery range, a crucial factor for electric vehicle (EV) users. Lower power consumption means the Hankook iON evo AS can extend your driving range further on a single charge compared to the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2. For EV drivers, maximizing battery efficiency is essential, and the Hankook iON evo AS offers a slight advantage in this key area.
ElectricDrive 2 :
- -4% in power consumption (efficiency)
UTQG ratings
The UTQG ratings reveal key differences between the Hankook iON evo AS and the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2. The Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 has a higher tread wear rating of 700 compared to the Hankook’s 600, suggesting it should last longer. Both tires share “A” ratings for traction and temperature, ensuring excellent grip and heat resistance. This makes the Goodyear tire advantageous for longer mileage on paper, offering more durability and potentially better value for EV users.
| Brand | Tireline | Size | Tread Wear | Traction | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook | iON evo AS | All | 600 | A | A |
| Goodyear | ElectricDrive 2 | All | 700 | A | A |
Price
For the 235/40R19 size, the Hankook iON evo AS is priced at $267, while the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 costs $275. This makes the Goodyear tire 3% more expensive than the Hankook.
Tire size: 235/40R19
- iON evo AS : $267
- ElectricDrive 2: $275
Difference: +3% more expensive for ElectricDrive 2.
Summary
As a tire expert, my take is that both the Hankook iON evo AS and the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 offer solid options for EV drivers, each with distinct advantages.
The Hankook iON evo AS shines in terms of efficiency and handling. It consumes less power, which is crucial for maximizing battery range, and it performs exceptionally well on dry surfaces. It’s also slightly cheaper, making it a great value for those looking for performance and efficiency at a lower cost.
On the other hand, the Goodyear ElectricDrive 2 excels in durability and wet performance. With a higher tread wear rating, it promises longer mileage, and it stops shorter and handles quicker in wet conditions. This makes it an excellent choice for drivers prioritizing safety and longevity, even though it comes at a slightly higher price.
Dr Edwin Pang
Choosing between these two comes down to your specific needs: go for the Hankook if you value efficiency and cost, or opt for the Goodyear for superior longevity and wet performance.