Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129: The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12 represent a thrilling showdown in the semi-slick/track day tire segment. Launched in 2018, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport quickly set the bar high, boasting cutting-edge technology designed for speed, control, and performance. Not to be outdone, Hankook entered the arena in 2020 with the Ventus S1 Evo Z K12, introducing its own blend of innovation and performance that challenges the status quo.
This battle between two titans of the tire industry highlights the pinnacle of racing technology, where every detail can make the difference between good and legendary. As they go head-to-head, enthusiasts and professionals alike eagerly watch to see which tire will claim supremacy on the track.
Table of Contents
Results: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
Results below were taken from 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tire Test with a total of 10 tires tested, The graph below shows the comparison between Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 based on the relevant performance category. Eagle F1 SuperSport was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
Note that for both wet & dry handling evaluation, the average lap speed was used instead of the standard lap time & subjective rating. The tire size of interest is 235/35 R19 which is a common tire size for Audi R8 & Volkswagen Golf R. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle is a Hyundia I30N which is a very fast car relative to its size.
Dry
In the high-stakes arena of semi-slick/track day tires, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12 are put to the test, revealing their prowess under dry conditions. When it comes to dry braking, the difference between the two is marginal but noteworthy. The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport takes a slight lead, stopping at 35.5 meters from 100 km/h to 0, compared to the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12’s stopping distance of 35.7 meters. This subtle difference of 0.2 meters could be crucial in scenarios where every fraction of a second counts, offering a slight edge in safety and performance.
In dry handling, which is a critical measure of a tire’s performance, especially in this segment, the tables turn. The Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12 outpaces the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport, with an average speed of 131.2 km/h compared to 130.4 km/h. This indicates that the Hankook tire provides slightly better grip and control around corners, translating to faster lap times and a more responsive driving experience.
Dry performance, encompassing both handling and braking, is paramount in semi-slick/track day tires. It directly affects the tire’s ability to maintain grip, control, and stability at high speeds and under aggressive driving conditions. The better a tire performs in dry conditions, the more confidence it instills in the driver, enabling them to push the limits of their vehicle safely. In this closely contested battle, both tires showcase their strengths, with the Goodyear offering slightly better braking and the Hankook edging ahead in handling, each contributing to the thrilling dynamics of high-performance driving.
Ventus S1 Evo Z K129:
- -1% in dry braking
- +1% in dry handling (average speed)
Wet
In the competitive sphere of semi-slick/track day tires, the primary focus is on dry performance, as it directly impacts the tire’s grip, control, and speed on the track. However, wet performance cannot be overlooked entirely, as it’s not just a matter of legal compliance but also contributes to the overall safety and versatility of the tire. The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12 both offer insights into their performance under wet conditions, albeit with an understanding that this aspect plays a secondary role compared to their dry capabilities.
In wet braking, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport slightly outperforms the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12, stopping from 80 km/h in 33.5 meters compared to Hankook’s 34 meters. This marginal difference of 0.5 meters, while minor, underscores Goodyear’s ability to offer a bit more security in emergency wet braking situations, albeit in a context where such capabilities are secondary to dry performance.
Wet handling tests, which assess the tire’s maneuverability in wet conditions, show an extremely close competition. The Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12 edges out slightly with an average speed of 87.9 km/h, just above the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport’s 87.7 km/h. This indicates Hankook’s nuanced advantage in maintaining control during wet cornering, a factor that, while secondary, adds to the tire’s adaptability in less-than-ideal conditions.
The wet circle test further highlights these tires’ ability to maintain grip in consistent wet conditions, with Goodyear achieving a slightly faster speed of 7.12 m/s over Hankook’s 7.08 m/s. This difference points to Goodyear’s enhanced lateral grip in wet conditions, a feature that, despite being secondary, is beneficial for maintaining stability.
Lastly, the straight aquaplaning test, which evaluates how well a tire can prevent water from causing loss of traction, sees the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12 performing slightly better with a slipping speed of 69.2 Km/H, compared to Goodyear’s 68.7 Km/H. Here, Hankook demonstrates a slight edge in aquaplaning resistance, contributing to safety in wet conditions, even if the primary focus remains on dry performance.
Overall, while dry performance is the star of the show in the semi-slick/track day tire category, the wet performance of both the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12 still plays a crucial role. It ensures legal compliance and offers an additional layer of safety and reliability, albeit in a supporting role to their primary function of excelling in dry conditions.
Ventus S1 Evo Z K129:
- -1% in wet braking
- ~0% in wet handling (average speed)
- -1% in wet circle
- +1% in straight aquaplaning
Exterior Noise
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport produces slightly more exterior noise at 68.8 dB compared to the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12, which registers at 68.1 dB. This minor difference of 0.7 dB indicates that the Hankook tire is a bit quieter, offering a potentially more peaceful driving experience. Even though this variance is small, it underscores the importance of noise level as a factor in the overall comfort and environmental friendliness of a tire.
Ventus S1 Evo Z K129:
- +1% in exterior noise (-0.7 dB)
Rolling Resistance
In the semi-slick/track day tire segment, where the focus is predominantly on maximizing grip and handling, the concept of rolling resistance often takes a backseat. Despite this, it’s interesting to note the rolling resistance performances of the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K12. The Goodyear tire has a rolling resistance of 9.8 N / kN, slightly higher than the Hankook’s 9.5 N / kN.
This marginal difference of 0.3 N / kN suggests that the Hankook tire is slightly more efficient in terms of energy loss as it rolls, potentially offering a minor improvement in fuel economy. However, it’s important to highlight that in this segment, such differences are often overshadowed by the pursuit of peak performance under high-speed and aggressive driving conditions, making rolling resistance a lesser concern for enthusiasts and professionals alike.
Ventus S1 Evo Z K129:
- +3% in rolling resistance
Price
In the comparison of tire prices for the size 235/35 R19, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 is notably more expensive, priced at $312, compared to the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport, which costs $261. This makes the Hankook tire 16% more expensive than the Goodyear.
Tire size: 235/35 R19
- Eagle F1 SuperSport: $ 261
- Ventus S1 Evo Z K129: $ 312
Difference: +16% more expensive for Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.
Summary
As a tire expert, I’ve closely examined the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129, assessing their performances across various tests. Both tires showcase their unique strengths, making the decision between them far from straightforward.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport demonstrates a slight advantage in wet braking and lateral wet grip, providing enhanced safety and performance in challenging conditions. It also has a marginally lower exterior noise level, contributing to a quieter ride. On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 shines with its superior dry handling and slightly better aquaplaning resistance, offering drivers confidence and control at high speeds on dry tracks. Additionally, its slightly lower rolling resistance could translate into minor fuel savings over time.
In conclusion, there’s no clear winner between the two. The choice ultimately comes down to what aspects of tire performance are most important to you, whether it’s the slight edge in wet conditions offered by the Goodyear or the superior dry performance and efficiency of the Hankook. Both tires represent the pinnacle of semi-slick/track day tire technology, and either would be a commendable choice for the discerning driver.
Dr Edwin Pang