Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo: The battle between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the newly launched 2025 Hankook Ventus Evo is set to be an intense clash. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, a proven winner in multiple press tests, has established itself as a top contender in the ultra-high performance (UHP) segment. On the other hand, the 2025 Ventus Evo enters the scene with high expectations, aiming to challenge the reigning champion. Can the new Ventus Evo dethrone the formidable Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6? Let’s find out!
Table of Contents
Results: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
The results presented here are from the 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test, where 20 of the best tire models were selected from an initial pool of 50. Given the high cost and extensive nature of wear testing, we were delighted to have it included. The accompanying graph provides a side-by-side comparison of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo across various performance categories, with the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 serving as the benchmark at 100%.
The tire size of interest is the 225/40R18 tire size, a popular choice for vehicles like the BMW 3 series Audi A4. For further insights into various tire sizes, feel free to consult our latest tire size table. The tests were conducted using a standard BMW 1 series as the test vehicle.
Wet
In wet braking, the Hankook Ventus Evo outperforms the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a stopping distance of 42.7 meters compared to 44.2 meters, making it 1.5 meters shorter (approximately 4% better). In wet handling, the Ventus Evo is slightly quicker, completing the lap at 73.5 km/h, while the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 manages 73 km/h, a difference of 0.5 km/h (about 1% faster). In straight-line aquaplaning resistance, the Ventus Evo also takes a slight edge, maintaining grip at 80.7 km/h versus 80.3 km/h for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, a difference of 0.4 km/h (around 0% better).
Ventus Evo:
- +4% in wet braking
- +1% in wet handling
- ~0% in aquaplaning
Dry
In dry braking, both the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Hankook Ventus Evo perform equally well, stopping at 34 meters, with no difference between them. Similarly, in dry handling, both tires achieve an identical speed of 120.9 km/h, showing no difference in performance.
Ventus Evo:
- 0% in dry braking
- 0% in dry handling
Wear
In terms of wear, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 significantly outlasts the Hankook Ventus Evo, achieving a mileage of 54,020 km compared to 41,440 km. This difference of 12,580 km translates to approximately 23% better wear performance for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Ventus Evo:
- -23% in mileage
Comfort & Noise
In subjective comfort, the Hankook Ventus Evo slightly edges out the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a score of 5 points compared to 4.7 points, marking a difference of 0.3 points (about 2% better). However, in terms of exterior noise, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is notably quieter, producing 71.3 dB compared to the Ventus Evo’s 73.1 dB, a difference of 1.8 dB (approximately 2% quieter).
Ventus Evo:
- +2% in subjective comfort
- -2% in exterior noise (+1.8 dB)
Rolling Resistance
The Hankook Ventus Evo demonstrates slightly lower rolling resistance compared to the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, with a value of 8.68 N/kN versus 8.97 N/kN. This difference of 0.29 N/kN represents approximately 3% lower rolling resistance for the Ventus Evo.
Ventus Evo:
- +3% in rolling resistance
Price
The Hankook Ventus Evo, priced at €105 for the 225/40 R18 size, is slightly more expensive than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 , which costs €98. The price difference of €7 makes the Ventus Evo approximately 7% more expensive.
Tire size: 225/40 R18
- Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 : € 98
- Ventus Evo : € 105
Difference: +7% more expensive for Ventus Evo .
Summary
As a tire expert, I see the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 as the clear winner in terms of longevity and noise comfort. Its superior wear performance (23% better) makes it an excellent choice for those looking to maximize mileage, and it also offers a quieter ride compared to the Hankook Ventus Evo.
On the other hand, the newly launched 2025 Hankook Ventus Evo impresses with its wet performance, achieving shorter braking distances, better wet handling, and slightly superior aquaplaning resistance. Additionally, it offers a softer and more comfortable ride, while also being more efficient in terms of rolling resistance.
In short, if you’re after longevity and quietness, go for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. If wet performance and comfort take priority, the Ventus Evo is a solid choice.
Dr Edwin Pang