Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52: In the world of touring tires, the Continental PremiumContact 7 stands as the undisputed champion, acclaimed for its exceptional performance, comfort, and durability. But can the rising contender, Kumho Ecsta HS52, truly challenge the reigning king? As we dive into this head-to-head clash, the question looms: Does Kumho have what it takes to dethrone the best touring tire on the market today? Get ready for an electrifying showdown as we compare these two titans in the battle for touring supremacy.
Table of Contents
Results: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52
The results featured here are from the 2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test, with 16 model of the finest tires were tested. Wear bring a extremely priced and expensive test were provided to our delight. The accompanying graph presents a side-by-side comparison of the Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 across various performance categories, with the Continental PremiumContact 7 serving as the benchmark at the 100% mark.
The tire size of interest is the 215/55R17 tire size, a popular choice for vehicles like the Honda HRV and Hyundai Kona Electric. For further insights into various tire sizes, feel free to consult our latest tire size table. The tests were conducted using a standard Volkswagen T-Roc as the test vehicle.
Wet
When it comes to wet performance, the Continental PremiumContact 7 outshines the Kumho Ecsta HS52. In wet braking tests from 80 to 0 km/h, the Continental stopped in 28.5 meters, significantly better than the Kumho’s 32.8 meters—giving the Continental a clear 4.3-meter advantage. This impressive braking ability is crucial in maintaining safety under rainy conditions. However, it’s important to remember that superior wet braking often comes with a trade-off between mileage and rolling resistance.
In terms of handling aquaplaning, both tires perform remarkably well, but the Continental slightly edges out the Kumho again. The Continental maintains grip up to 74 km/h before slipping, while the Kumho begins to lose traction slightly earlier at 73.8 km/h. While the difference is marginal, every fraction of a second matters in wet conditions. As you weigh these factors, consider how these performance aspects balance against each tire’s longevity and efficiency.
Ecsta HS52 :
- -13% in wet braking
- ~0% in straight aquaplaning
Dry
In dry braking, the Continental PremiumContact 7 stops in 35.4 meters, while the Kumho Ecsta HS52 takes 38.1 meters—a 2.7-meter advantage for Continental. This difference underscores the PremiumContact 7’s superior performance and safety on dry roads.
Ecsta HS52 :
- -7% in dry braking
Wear
In terms of mileage, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 outperforms the Continental PremiumContact 7. The Kumho lasts 69,300 km, which is 9,000 km more than the Continental’s 60,300 km lifespan. Additionally, the Kumho has a lower abrasion rate at 55 mg/km/t compared to Continental’s 60.1 mg/km/t, indicating less wear per kilometer.
This trade-off highlights the classic conflict between wet braking performance and durability, with the Kumho excelling in longevity while the Continental sacrifices some wear resistance for superior wet braking capabilities.
Ecsta HS52 :
- +15% in mileage
- +9% in abrasion
Noise
When comparing exterior noise levels, the Continental PremiumContact 7 is quieter, producing 71.3 dB, whereas the Kumho Ecsta HS52 generates 72.6 dB. This 1.3 dB difference means the Continental is slightly less noisy, providing a more serene driving experience compared to the Kumho.
Ecsta HS52 :
- -2% in exterior noise (+1.3 dB)
Fuel Consumption
In terms of fuel consumption, both the Continental PremiumContact 7 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 are evenly matched, each consuming 5.9 liters per 100 km. This identical performance means neither tire offers an advantage in fuel efficiency, making them equal in this regard.
Ecsta HS52 :
- 0% in fuel consumption
Price
When comparing prices for the 215/55 R17 size, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 stands out for its affordability at €100, making it 49% cheaper than the Continental PremiumContact 7, priced at €149. This significant cost advantage makes the Kumho a more budget-friendly option while still offering competitive performance.
Tire size: 215/55 R17
- Primacy 4+ : € 149
- Ecsta HS52 : € 100
Difference: -49% more cheaper for Ecsta HS52
Summary
As a tire expert, it’s clear that both the Continental PremiumContact 7 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 have their distinct advantages. The Continental PremiumContact 7 excels in wet braking and overall quietness, providing superior safety and a more comfortable driving experience. However, this comes with a trade-off, as its exceptional wet braking performance tends to shorten its mileage.
On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 offers impressive longevity and a significant cost advantage, being 49% cheaper. While it doesn’t quite match the Continental in wet braking, it strikes a better balance for those prioritizing mileage and affordability.
Ultimately, the choice boils down to your priorities: if you value top-tier wet performance and comfort, the Continental is your go-to. If long-lasting durability and cost savings are more important, the Kumho stands out. This wet braking versus mileage trade-off is a critical consideration in selecting the right tire for your needs.
Dr Edwin Pang