Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac: In this all-season 3 Peak Mountain showdown, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2, launched in 2023, faces off against the well-established Vredestein Quatrac, which hit the market in 2020. With the AllSeasonContact 2 bringing the latest advancements and the Quatrac already proven in various conditions, this battle is set to be a thrilling clash of new innovation versus refined performance. Who will reign supreme in this all-season battle of grip, durability, and year-round versatility? Let’s find out!
Table of Contents
Results: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
Results below were taken from the 2023 Auto Bild All Season Test. A whopping 35 tires were tested this time around with only 16 tires making it into the final round. The graph below shows the comparison between Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac based on the relevant performance category. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
Auto Bild did the full range of test including snow & the expensive wear test. The tire size of interest is a 225/45 R17 which is a common tire size for Volvo S60 & BMW 3 Series. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle of choice is a BMW 3 series.
Wet
In wet braking, both the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Vredestein Quatrac deliver the same performance with a braking distance of 45.4 meters. However, in wet handling, the Vredestein Quatrac outperforms the AllSeasonContact 2, with a higher speed of 76.1 km/h compared to 74.6 km/h. The Quatrac also shows superiority in straight-line aquaplaning resistance, managing a speed of 79.2 km/h, which is 3.1 km/h faster than the AllSeasonContact 2 at 76.1 km/h. Overall, the Quatrac takes the lead in wet performance.
Quatrac :
- =0% in wet braking
- +2% in wet handling
- +4% in aquaplaning
Snow
In snow braking, the Vredestein Quatrac slightly outperforms the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 with a 0.1-meter shorter stopping distance at 23.1 meters compared to 23.2 meters. However, in snow traction, the AllSeasonContact 2 shows a significant advantage, generating 2,744 Newtons of force, which is 144 Newtons more than the Quatrac’s 2,600 Newtons. For snow handling, the AllSeasonContact 2 also leads with a speed of 57.4 km/h, 0.3 km/h faster than the Quatrac’s 57.1 km/h. Overall, the AllSeasonContact 2 has the edge in snow performance with better traction and handling.
Quatrac :
- ~0% in snow braking
- -5% in snow traction
- -1% in snow handling
Wear
In terms of mileage performance, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 significantly outlasts the Vredestein Quatrac, with a wear life of 58,923 km compared to just 43,091 km for the Quatrac, a difference of 15,832 km. This shows a substantial advantage for the Continental tire in longevity.
Despite both tires performing equally in wet braking with a distance of 45.4 meters, the AllSeasonContact 2 achieves much higher mileage. This highlights a remarkable balance in Continental’s target conflict management, maintaining strong wet braking performance without compromising on tire wear, demonstrating its clear technological dominance over the Vredestein Quatrac.
Quatrac :
- -27% in mileage
Dry
In dry braking, the Vredestein Quatrac has a slight edge over the Continental AllSeasonContact 2, stopping at 40.3 meters, which is 0.1 meters shorter than the AllSeasonContact 2’s 40.4 meters. However, in dry handling, the Quatrac extends its lead further, achieving a higher speed of 89 km/h compared to the AllSeasonContact 2’s 87.8 km/h. The Vredestein Quatrac shows better performance in both dry braking and dry handling, demonstrating a slight but consistent advantage over the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 in dry conditions.
Quatrac :
- ~0% in dry braking
- +1% in dry handling
Noise
In terms of exterior noise performance, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is quieter than the Vredestein Quatrac, producing 72.3 dB compared to the Quatrac’s 72.9 dB. This difference of 0.6 dB means the AllSeasonContact 2 provides a slightly quieter ride, showing its advantage in minimizing road noise over the Vredestein Quatrac.
Quatrac :
- -1% in exterior noise (+0.6 dB)
Rolling Resistance
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Quatrac, with a measurement of 7.68 N/kN compared to 8.27 N/kN for the Quatrac. This lower rolling resistance translates to better fuel efficiency, as the AllSeasonContact 2 consumes 5.56 liters per 100 km, while the Quatrac uses 5.78 liters per 100 km. The difference of 0.22 liters per 100 km indicates that the AllSeasonContact 2 is more fuel-efficient, demonstrating its advantage in both rolling resistance and fuel consumption over the Vredestein Quatrac.
Quatrac :
- -7% in rolling resistance
- -4% in fuel consumption
Price
For the tire size 205/55 R16, the Vredestein Quatrac is priced at €83, making it 10% cheaper than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2, which costs €91. The price difference highlights the Quatrac as the more budget-friendly option between the two.
Tire size: 205/55 R16
Difference: -10% cheaper for Quatrac
Expert’s Perspective
As a tire expert, I’d summarize the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Vredestein Quatrac as strong contenders in the all-season category, each excelling in different areas. Both tires perform equally in wet and snow braking, showing reliable stopping power. However, the Vredestein Quatrac takes the lead in wet conditions with superior wet handling and aquaplaning resistance, making it a great choice for those who prioritize wet performance. On the other hand, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 shows clear dominance in snow performance, with better traction and handling on snowy roads. It also offers exceptional mileage, demonstrating Continental’s superior technology in balancing the challenging trade-off between wet braking performance and long tire wear. Overall, each tire has its strengths, making them suitable for different driving needs and preferences.
Dr Edwin Pang