Skip to Content

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Dunlop All Season 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Dunlop All Season 2

Introducing the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Dunlop All Season 2 – an exciting clash in the all-season tire arena! With the AllSeasonContact 2 representing Continental’s latest tech advancements and the Dunlop All Season 2 hitting the market in 2023, this showdown pits two fresh contenders against each other. Both promise year-round reliability, but which one will dominate the roads? Let the battle begin!

Results: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Dunlop All Season 2

Results below were taken from the 2024 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test with a total of 15 tires tested. The graph below shows the comparison between Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Dunlop All Season 2 based on the relevant performance category. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 tire was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.

It’s important to note that for subjective tests, the evaluation was based on average lap speed which is commonly used in magazine tests. The tire size of interest is a 225/50 R17 which is a common tire size for BMW 3 series. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle of choice is a BMW 3 series.

Testing vehicle of choice: BMW 3 series on snow handling action
Testing vehicle of choice: BMW 3 series on snow handling action

Wet

In wet braking, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stops 3.7 meters shorter than the Dunlop All Season 2, showing stronger braking performance. For wet handling, the Continental also leads with an average lap speed of 75.3 km/h, edging out the Dunlop’s 72.4 km/h by 2.9 km/h, indicating better control and agility. In straight aquaplaning, however, both tires perform almost equally, with the Continental slipping at 72.9 km/h and the Dunlop at a close 72.8 km/h.

Dunlop All Season 2 :

  • -6% in wet braking
  • -4% in wet handling
  • ~0% in aquaplaning

Snow

In snow braking, both the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Dunlop All Season 2 match perfectly with a stopping distance of 24.4 meters. However, in snow traction, the Continental takes a slight lead with a pulling force of 2668 N, outperforming the Dunlop’s 2610 N by 58 N, indicating stronger grip. For snow handling, the Continental again shows superiority, achieving an average lap speed of 55.4 km/h compared to the Dunlop’s 52.5 km/h, marking a 2.9 km/h advantage in control on snowy surfaces.

Dunlop All Season 2 :

  • 0% in snow braking
  • -2% in snow traction
  • -5% in snow handling

Mileage

The Dunlop All Season 2 offers a huge advantage in mileage, lasting 18,080 km longer than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2, which translates to a remarkable difference in durability. In terms of abrasion, the Dunlop also impresses, losing only 533 g compared to the Continental’s 791 g, showing less wear over time. This longevity and wear resistance come with only a 6% trade-off in wet braking performance, making the Dunlop All Season 2 an excellent high-value choice for extended mileage and durability.

Dunlop All Season 2 :

  • +37% in mileage
  • +48%  in abrasion

Dry

In dry braking, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stops 1.6 meters shorter than the Dunlop All Season 2, offering a slight edge in stopping distance. For dry handling, both perform nearly identically, with the Continental reaching an average lap speed of 94 km/h, just 0.1 km/h faster than the Dunlop’s 93.9 km/h, showing minimal difference in control on dry surfaces.

Dunlop All Season 2 :

  • -4% in dry braking
  • ~0%  in dry handling

Noise

The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 produces slightly less exterior noise at 72 dB, making it 1.1 dB quieter than the Dunlop All Season 2’s 73.1 dB. This small reduction contributes to a quieter ride with the Continental, though both are fairly close in noise levels.

Dunlop All Season 2 :

  • -2% in exterior noise (+1.1 dB)

Rolling Resistance

In rolling resistance, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 slightly outperforms the Dunlop All Season 2, with a resistance of 7.53 N/kN compared to Dunlop’s 7.68 N/kN. This minor difference indicates that the Continental offers slightly better fuel efficiency, though both perform closely in this category.

Dunlop All Season 2 :

  • -2% in rolling resistance

Price

For the 225/50 R17 size, the Dunlop All Season 2 is priced at €124, making it 17% cheaper than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 at €145. This cost difference might be attributed to Dunlop’s quality segment position compared to Continental’s premium positioning.

Tire size: 225/50 R17

Difference: -17% more cheaper for Dunlop All Season 2

Conclusion

As a tire expert, I’d conclude that both the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Dunlop All Season 2 bring notable strengths to the table. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 excels in wet braking, dry braking, and handling, making it ideal for those prioritizing all-around safety and a quieter ride. On the other hand, the Dunlop All Season 2 stands out with exceptional mileage and lower abrasion, offering tremendous value for long-term use. Its 17% lower price and extremely high mileage performance come with only a 6% trade-off in wet braking, making it an excellent choice for drivers seeking longevity and cost-efficiency.

Dr Edwin Pang
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]