BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 vs Falken WildPeak A/T4W — the long-awaited showdown between two of the biggest names in the all-terrain game is finally here. Both launched recently, the KO3 and AT4W arrive with massive expectations, promising next-level durability, traction, and versatility. It’s the ultimate battle in the rugged AT landscape — legacy vs rising force. Let the off-road war begin!
Table of Contents
Results: BFGoodrich All-Terrain TA KO3 vs Falken WildPeak AT4W
Results below were taken from the Tire Rack’s “Taking Off-Road Tires On-Road- 2024” test. A total of 12 tires were tested this time around in Tire Rack’s own proving ground. The graph below shows the comparison between BFGoodrich All-Terrain TA KO3 vs Falken WildPeak AT4W based on the relevant performance category. The BFGoodrich All-Terrain TA KO3 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark. Note that for subjective evaluation, we equate 1 point as 5%. Hence for example if tire A is graded 7 while tire B is graded 6, A is better than B by 5%.
As both tires are have the elusive 3 peak mountain logo, Tire Rack has included snow & ice in its testing portfolio. The tire size of interest is 265/70R17 which is a common tire size for Chevrolet Silverado & GMC Sierra. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle is a 2024 Toyota Tacoma TRD Sport.
Wet
In wet braking, the Falken WildPeak A/T4W stops 13 feet shorter than the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3, a 8% improvement. On the wet handling lap, the Falken also finishes 2.92 seconds faster, which translates to a 8% quicker time. Overall, the Falken clearly dominates the KO3 in wet performance.
WildPeak AT4W :
- +8% in wet braking
- +8% in wet handling (lap time)
Dry
In dry braking, the Falken WildPeak A/T4W stops 9 feet shorter than the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3, marking a 7% improvement. Once again, the Falken proves its edge with stronger on-road stopping power.
WildPeak AT4W :
- +7% in dry braking
Noise/Comfort/Ride Quality
In terms of noise, comfort, and ride quality, the Falken WildPeak A/T4W scores slightly higher with 6.58 compared to the KO3’s 6.42, a modest 1% improvement. While the difference is small, the Falken continues to edge ahead in overall refinement.
WildPeak AT4W :
- +1% in average of Noise, Comfort & Ride Quality.
Snow
In snow braking, the KO3 stops 10 feet shorter than the WildPeak A/T4W, showing a 12% advantage. It also accelerates quicker, reaching 12 mph in 2.7 feet less, a 5% improvement. In subjective snow handling, the WildPeak scores slightly higher at 5.33 versus KO3’s 5.00, a 2% edge. On the snow handling lap, the Falken completes the run 0.8 seconds faster, a 3% gain. Despite Falken’s slight edge in handling feel and lap time, the KO3 dominates snow braking and acceleration.
WildPeak AT4W :
- -12% in Snow braking
- -5% in Snow Acceleration
- +2% in Snow handling (subj)
- +3% in Snow handling(lap time)
Ice
In ice braking, the Falken WildPeak A/T4W stops 5.8 feet shorter than the KO3, a 12% improvement. It also accelerates quicker on ice, completing the 60-foot run 0.27 seconds faster, which is a 5% advantage. Falken clearly leads in icy conditions.
WildPeak AT4W :
- +12% in Ice braking
- +5% in Ice acceleration
Price
In 265/70R17, the Falken WildPeak A/T4W is 5% cheaper than the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3.
Tire size: 265/70R17
- All-Terrain TA KO3: $ 295
- WildPeak AT4W : $ 281
Difference: -5% more cheaper for WildPeak AT4W.
Summary
From my perspective as a tire expert, the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 shines in deep snow with superior braking and acceleration, making it a strong choice for harsh winter conditions. However, the Falken WildPeak AT4W offers better wet and dry braking, quicker lap times, quieter and more comfortable ride, and stronger performance on ice—all while being more affordable. For overall versatility and daily drivability, the WildPeak AT4W takes the lead.
Dr Edwin Pang