Cross Section of Giti Control P10 vs Michelin & Continental–>This article provides a detailed examination of the performance of high-end touring tires in the APAC region. Building on our previous review of the Michelin Primacy 4 ST and Continental UltraContact 7, this analysis broadens its scope based on the recently concluded Top Tire Review 2023 APAC Touring Test.
It specifically looks at the body ply, bead, cap ply, Under Tread Gauge (UTG), and tread depth of the Giti Control P10 in comparison with Michelin and Continental models. The aim is to deliver a thorough insight into the design and performance implications of these parts, helping readers make informed decisions when choosing tires for touring purposes.
Table of Contents
Results: Cross Section of Giti Control P10
| Body ply | Bead | Capply | Under Tread Gauge (UTG),mm | |
| Giti Control P10 | C | Hex-1x2x4 | 212 | 1.9 |
| Michelin Primacy 4 ST | 2+0 | 5×5 | 212 hybrid | 3.2 |
| Continental UltraContact 7 | 1+0 | 5×4 | 222 | 3 |
Body Ply:
In comparing the body ply structures of the Giti Control P10, Michelin Primacy 4 ST, and Continental UltraContact 7 tires, each one has its unique setup. The Giti Control P10 employs a “C ply” configuration, which aims to be almost as robust as a 2+0 configuration but doesn’t quite reach the same strength level. It offers better robustness than a single 1+0 ply without needing an extra ply, making it a more efficient choice. Meanwhile, the Michelin Primacy 4 ST utilizes a 2+0 configuration, generally providing excellent durability and stability. The Continental UltraContact 7 opts for a simpler 1+0 configuration, which may not be as sturdy as the other two.
The “C” ply in the Giti Control P10 is advantageous because it nearly matches the strength of a 2+0 configuration while avoiding the need for an additional ply, leading to a more streamlined design. However, it falls slightly short of the 2+0’s strength. Additionally, its manufacturing has a drawback: the ply length is limited due to the tire manufacturing method, which can pose restrictions during production.
Bead:
When looking at the bead configurations of the Giti Control P10, Michelin Primacy 4 ST, and Continental UltraContact 7 tires, there are distinct differences. The Giti Control P10 uses a Hex-1x2x4 bead configuration, which is designed to be cost-effective by using less material than its competitors. This hex bead design helps to reduce costs while still maintaining performance.
In contrast, the Michelin Primacy 4 ST features a 5×5 bead configuration, and the Continental UltraContact 7 has a 5×4 configuration. Both of these are more traditional and might use more material compared to the hex bead of the Giti, potentially making them more expensive to produce.
Cap Ply:
The Giti Control P10 employs a 212 cap ply configuration, advantageous for high-speed stability and offering cost savings when compared to more intricate designs like the 222 cap ply found in the Continental UltraContact 7. However, the more straightforward 212 setup in the Giti Control P10 might result in irregular wear over its lifespan. Conversely, the Michelin Primacy 4 ST’s 212 hybrid cap ply is designed for enhanced durability. The choice of cap ply in each tire represents a trade-off among performance, longevity, and production expenses, with the Giti Control P10 emphasizing efficiency at high speeds and economical manufacturing.
Under Tread Gauge (UTG):
When comparing the Under Tread Gauge (UTG) configurations of the Giti Control P10, Michelin Primacy 4 ST, and Continental UltraContact 7 tires, there are notable differences in design and performance implications. The Giti Control P10 has a low UTG of 1.9mm, which aids in handling and rolling resistance, making it more responsive and efficient. This lower gauge also helps reduce manufacturing costs. However, the drawback is tighter manufacturing tolerances, which can be challenging to maintain during production.
On the other hand, the Michelin Primacy 4 ST has a higher UTG of 3.2mm, and the Continental UltraContact 7 has a UTG of 3mm. While a higher UTG can enhance noise reduction, offering a quieter ride, it comes with the opposite drawbacks: it typically increases rolling resistance, which can affect fuel efficiency and handling, and also adds to manufacturing costs due to the extra material used.
Tread depth:
| Tread depth, mm | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Average |
| Giti Control P10 | 6.35 | 6.74 | 6.71 | 6.14 | 6.49 |
| Michelin Primacy 4 ST | 6.48 | 7.16 | 7 | 6.64 | 6.82 |
| Continental UltraContact UC7 | 7.41 | 7.53 | 7.3 | 7 | 7.31 |
When comparing the tread depth of the Giti Control P10, Michelin Primacy 4 ST, and Continental UltraContact UC7 tires, each has a different approach affecting their performance. The Giti Control P10 has the lowest average tread depth at 6.49mm, which significantly enhances handling and reduces rolling resistance (RR) and noise, making for a smoother and more efficient ride. However, the main downside of this lower tread depth is reduced mileage (assuming the same wear rate) ; the tires may wear out faster compared to those with deeper treads.
The Michelin Primacy 4 ST has a slightly deeper tread at 6.82mm, offering a balance between handling and mileage. It might not handle quite as well as the Giti but can provide better longevity. The Continental UltraContact UC7 has the deepest tread at 7.31mm, likely offering the best mileage and durability over time but at the potential cost of increased noise and slightly reduced handling and efficiency due to the higher rolling resistance.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Giti Control P10 distinguishes itself from competitors like the Michelin Primacy 4 ST and Continental UltraContact UC7 in several key areas. It employs a unique “C” body ply configuration and a cost-effective Hex-1x2x4 bead design, both of which contribute to its efficiency and cost savings. Its lower Under Tread Gauge (UTG) of 1.9mm enhances handling and rolling resistance but requires more precise manufacturing.
Additionally, the Giti’s lower average tread depth of 6.49mm significantly improves handling and reduces noise, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing performance and efficiency. However, these features also lead to its main drawback: reduced mileage due to faster wear. Overall, the Giti Control P10 offers a distinctive blend of cost-effectiveness and performance, making it a noteworthy option in the high-end touring tire market.
High-Resolution cross-section images:
