General Grabber HTS60 vs Continental TerrainContact H/T: In the realm of all-season truck tires, two standout contenders emerge from the same prestigious lineage: the General Grabber HTS60 and the Continental TerrainContact H/T. Crafted under the expansive umbrella of Continental, with the General brand being a vital part of its North American portfolio, these tires epitomize the pinnacle of automotive excellence. However, despite their shared heritage, they carve distinct paths in the market. The General Grabber HTS60 is celebrated for its robust quality and reliability, designed to deliver performance and durability for a variety of driving conditions.
In contrast, the Continental TerrainContact H/T is positioned as a premium offering, focusing on superior comfort, enhanced traction, and an overall elevated driving experience. This familial rivalry sets the stage for an electrifying comparison, pitting the legacy of quality against the innovation of premium design. As we delve into the details of the General Grabber HTS60 versus the Continental TerrainContact H/T, prepare for a captivating duel that showcases the pinnacle of all-season truck tire engineering from a company renowned for its tire-making prowess. The stage is set for an intriguing face-off between these two titans of the tire world, each with its own strengths and unique appeal.
Table of Contents
Results: General Grabber HTS60 vs Continental TerrainContact H/T
Ideally you would like to have a 1 v 1 test results to show its clear performance difference. However this time around as there is clear segmentation, there are no test results which ran these 2 products simultaneously. Lucky for us, consumer report has tested both tires separately and we would be able to use their ratings to judge how well both tires fared. Do note that the consumer report uses a maximum rating of 5 which means that a rating of 5/5 is the best possible achievement.
The graph above shows the comparison between General Grabber HTS60 vs Continental TerrainContact H/T based on the relevant performance category. The tire size of interest for this test is a 265/70R17 which is a common tire size for Toyota FJ Cruiser. For further insights into various tire sizes, feel free to consult our latest tire size table.
Wet
When it comes to wet performance, the General Grabber HTS60 and the Continental TerrainContact H/T tires exhibit noteworthy differences that cater to varying driver needs. In the domain of wet braking, both tires share an identical rating, suggesting a similar stopping performance from 60 to 0 mph, which implies no significant advantage for either tire in reducing stopping distances on wet surfaces.
Wet Braking:
- Grabber HTS60 : 3/5
- TerrainContact H/T : 3/5
Handling (Wet) :
- Grabber HTS60 : 3/5
- TerrainContact H/T : 4/5
Hydroplaning :
- Grabber HTS60 : 4/5
- TerrainContact H/T : 3/5
However, when maneuvering through wet conditions, the Continental TerrainContact H/T pulls ahead with a better handling rating, implying it offers a more secure and responsive driving experience compared to the General Grabber HTS60. On the flip side, the General Grabber HTS60 showcases superior hydroplaning resistance, indicating a stronger ability to maintain traction and control in standing water situations than the Continental TerrainContact H/T. This contrast highlights the unique strengths of each tire, with the Grabber HTS60 prioritizing hydroplaning resistance and the TerrainContact H/T focusing on enhancing wet handling capabilities.
Dry
When it comes to dry braking performance, both the General Grabber HTS60 and the Continental TerrainContact H/T exhibit identical capabilities, with each scoring a solid 4 out of 5. This means that whether you choose the Grabber HTS60 or the TerrainContact H/T, you can expect the same level of performance in stopping your vehicle efficiently from 60 to 0 mph under dry conditions. This parity in dry braking underscores the quality and reliability that both tires offer, making them both strong contenders for those prioritizing safety and performance on dry roads.
Dry Braking :
- Grabber HTS60 : 4/5
- TerrainContact H/T : 4/5
MIleage
In terms of mileage performance, the Continental TerrainContact H/T outpaces the General Grabber HTS60, with actual tested mileage showing a significant difference. The TerrainContact H/T boasts an impressive 70,000 miles of actual tested mileage, perfectly aligning with its tread life warranty of 70,000 miles. This consistency indicates that the tire lives up to its long-lasting promise.
On the other hand, the General Grabber HTS60 shows a tested mileage of 55,000 miles, falling short of its tread life warranty by 10,000 miles, as it is warranted for 65,000 miles. This comparison highlights the superior mileage performance and reliability of the Continental TerrainContact H/T over the General Grabber HTS60, making the TerrainContact H/T a more dependable choice for drivers seeking longevity in their tire investment.
Actual tested mileage:
- Grabber HTS60 : 55,000 miles
- TerrainContact H/T : 70,000 miles
Snow
In the realm of snow performance, the Continental TerrainContact H/T takes a clear lead over the General Grabber HTS60. With a snow traction rating of 5 out of 5, the TerrainContact H/T matches the performance of tires boasting the 3-peak mountain certification, despite not having the certification itself. This exceptional rating underscores its superior capability and reliability in snowy conditions, offering confidence and safety for drivers navigating winter roads.
On the other side, the General Grabber HTS60 holds its ground with a commendable score of 4 out of 5 in snow traction. While this shows the tire’s strong performance in snow, it falls just a step behind the TerrainContact H/T. The difference between the two underscores the TerrainContact H/T’s edge in delivering enhanced grip and control in snowy conditions, setting a benchmark that’s akin to specialized winter tires.
In comparing the two, the TerrainContact H/T’s top-tier snow traction rating signifies a noteworthy advantage for drivers in snowy and icy conditions, offering a level of performance and peace of mind that closely mirrors that of certified winter tires.
Snow Traction :
- Grabber HTS60 : 4/5
- TerrainContact H/T : 5/5
Noise Vibration Harshness (NVH)
When assessing NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) performances between the General Grabber HTS60 and the Continental TerrainContact H/T, a distinct difference is observed in the noise aspect, while ride comfort shows parity. The Continental TerrainContact H/T stands out with a noise rating of 5 out of 5, indicating it offers a quieter ride compared to the General Grabber HTS60, which has a noise rating of 4 out of 5. This suggests that drivers of vehicles equipped with the TerrainContact H/T can expect a notably more serene driving experience, reducing the auditory impact of the road for a more pleasant journey.
Noise :
- Grabber HTS60 : 4/5
- TerrainContact H/T : 5/5
On the other hand, both tires score equally in terms of ride comfort, each receiving a rating of 3 out of 5. This suggests that, despite differences in noise reduction capabilities, both tires provide a similar level of comfort when it comes to absorbing road irregularities and minimizing the feeling of vibration through the vehicle.
Ride Comfort :
- Grabber HTS60 : 3/5
- TerrainContact H/T : 3/5
In essence, while the General Grabber HTS60 and the Continental TerrainContact H/T offer comparable ride comfort, the TerrainContact H/T takes the lead in creating a quieter environment, enhancing the overall driving experience with reduced noise levels.
Rolling Resistance
The General Grabber HTS60, with a rolling resistance rating of 4, offers better fuel efficiency than the Continental TerrainContact H/T, which scores a 3. This means the Grabber HTS60 is more efficient, potentially saving on fuel costs compared to the TerrainContact H/T.
Rolling Resistance :
- Grabber HTS60 : 4/5
- TerrainContact H/T : 3/5
Price
The Continental TerrainContact H/T, priced at $227, is about 17% more expensive than the General Grabber HTS60, which costs $188, for the tire size 245/60R18. This makes the TerrainContact H/T a pricier option.
Tire size: 245/60R18
- Grabber HTS60 : $188
- TerrainContact H/T : $227
Difference: +17% more expensive for TerrainContact H/T.
Summary
As a tire expert, I’ve delved into the specifics of the General Grabber HTS60 and the Continental TerrainContact H/T, and here’s the breakdown for discerning drivers:
The General Grabber HTS60, with its lower price point and better rolling resistance, is the go-to for budget-conscious drivers who value fuel efficiency and overall cost-effectiveness. Its commendable performance in a variety of conditions makes it a solid choice for those who require a reliable tire without breaking the bank.
On the other hand, the Continental TerrainContact H/T, although more expensive, stands out for its superior noise reduction and unmatched snow traction. It caters to drivers seeking a premium driving experience, emphasizing comfort and safety in snowy conditions. Its higher price is justified by its top-tier performance and the promise of a quieter, more comfortable ride.
In summary, if your focus is on saving at the pump and upfront costs, the Grabber HTS60 is your tire. However, if you don’t mind spending a bit more for enhanced comfort and superior performance in snow, the TerrainContact H/T is the clear choice. Let your preferences for cost, comfort, and specific driving conditions guide your selection between these two exceptional tires.
Dr Edwin Pang