Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS--> Tesla Model Y OE vs Replacement: In this exciting showdown, we delve into the world of high-performance tires, comparing the Original Equipment (OE) tire for the Tesla Model Y – the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S – against a formidable contender in the replacement market, the Falken Azenis FK460 AS. This comparison isn’t just about rubber and tread patterns; it’s a critical decision point for Tesla Model Y owners.
The question at hand: Should you stick with the trusted OE tires specifically designed for your vehicle, or venture into the replacement market in search of potentially better alternatives? With the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 offering renowned reliability and the Falken Azenis FK460 AS promising ultra-high performance in all seasons, this is more than a battle of brands; it’s a pivotal choice that could redefine your driving experience. Stay tuned as we delve deeper into each tire’s features, performance, and suitability for your Tesla Model Y.
Table of Contents
Results: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS
Results below were taken from Tyre Reviews “Goodyear Eagle F1 vs Falken Azenis FK460 vs Wildpeak AT Trail” test. A total of 3 tires were tested this time around. The graph below shows the comparison between Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS based on the relevant performance category. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
As both tires have winter capabilities, snow testing including traction, braking & handling were tested. The tire size of interest is a 255/40 R20 which is a common tire size for Tesla Model S & Y. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle for this tire test is a Tesla Model Y.
Wet
In a head-to-head comparison of wet performance between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S and the Falken Azenis FK460 AS, we observe notable differences. Starting with wet braking, the Goodyear requires 47.2 meters (155 feet) to come to a stop, whereas the Falken tire stops a bit sooner at 43.8 meters (144 feet). This 3.4-meter difference (11 feet) indicates that the Falken Azenis FK460 AS has a slight edge in stopping power on wet surfaces.
Moving to wet handling, which is measured by lap times on a wet track, the Goodyear completes a lap in 48.15 seconds. In comparison, the Falken manages a slightly faster lap time at 47.41 seconds. This difference of approximately 0.74 seconds suggests that the Falken tire offers better grip and handling in wet conditions, allowing for a quicker lap time.
In summary, the Falken Azenis FK460 AS shows a decent advantage in both wet braking and handling over the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S, potentially making it a more suitable choice for drivers who prioritize performance in wet conditions.
Azenis FK460 AS :
- +8% in wet braking
- +2% in wet handling (lap time)
Snow
When comparing the snow performances of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S and the Falken Azenis FK460 AS, it’s important to note that neither tire possesses the 3 Peak Mountain Snowflake certification, often seen as a benchmark for snow performance. However, in practical tests, the Falken tire truly stands out in snowy conditions, which is somewhat unexpected given that snow performance is not typically a primary focus for Original Equipment (OE) tires like the Goodyear.
In snow braking, where shorter distances are better, the Goodyear stops in 19.1 meters (63feet), whereas the Falken requires only 15.9 meters (52 feet). This 3.2-meter difference (11 feet) indicates that the Falken has superior stopping power in snowy conditions. For snow traction, which is measured by how quickly a tire can complete a specific distance, the Goodyear takes 26.5 seconds, whereas the Falken completes the same distance more swiftly in 23.1 seconds. This difference of 3.4 seconds highlights the Falken’s better traction in snow.
Finally, in snow handling, assessed by lap times on a snowy track, the Goodyear completes a lap in 87.6 seconds, while the Falken does it in 85.8 seconds. This margin of 1.8 seconds suggests that the Falken offers better control and handling in snowy conditions.
Overall, despite the lack of a specialized snow certification, the Falken Azenis FK460 AS demonstrates much better performance in snow braking, traction, and handling compared to the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S. This makes the Falken a compelling choice for drivers who encounter snowy conditions, despite it being a replacement market tire.
Azenis FK460 AS :
- +20% in snow braking
- +15% in snow traction
- +2% in snow handling
Dry
In the realm of dry performance, where Original Equipment (OE) tires like the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S are often expected to excel, we find a distinct advantage for the Goodyear over the Falken Azenis FK460 AS. This edge in dry conditions is not surprising, considering that OE tires are typically optimized for dry performance, which is reflected in their lower tread depth (6.6mm for the Goodyear vs. 7.6mm for the Falken).
Looking at dry braking, where shorter distances indicate better performance, the Goodyear stops in 35.5 meters (117 feet), while the Falken takes slightly longer at 37.1 meters (122 feet). This 1.6-meter difference (5 feet) shows the Goodyear’s superior stopping capability on dry surfaces. When it comes to dry handling, measured by lap times on a dry track, the Goodyear completes a lap in 42.73 seconds, just marginally faster than the Falken, which finishes in 42.79 seconds. This slim difference of 0.06 seconds, though small, still points to the Goodyear having a slight edge in terms of handling efficiency on dry surfaces.
In conclusion, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S demonstrates a distinct advantage in dry conditions, with better braking and slightly superior handling compared to the Falken Azenis FK460 AS. This aligns with the general expectation that OE tires, like the Goodyear, are primarily designed to perform well in dry conditions.
Azenis FK460 AS :
- -4% in dry braking
- ~0% in dry handling (lap time)
Noise/Comfort/Ride Quality
In the NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) performance assessment of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S and the Falken Azenis FK460 AS, it’s important to note that Goodyear has incorporated silent foam technology in their tires, particularly for the Tesla Model Y OE tires. This foam acts as a noise absorber, giving the Goodyear tires an added advantage in terms of noise reduction.
Despite this technological edge, the subjective differences in NVH performance between the two tires are not markedly large. For subjective comfort, rated out of 10, the Goodyear scores 9.7 points, marginally higher than the Falken’s 9.5 points. While this slight edge indicates a potentially smoother and more comfortable ride for the Goodyear, the difference is not overwhelming.
In the area of subjective noise, also rated out of 10, the Goodyear achieves a perfect score of 10 points, compared to the Falken’s close 9.6 points. This indicates that, while the Goodyear tire is perceived to be quieter, likely due to its silent foam technology, the Falken tire is not far behind in terms of noise reduction.
Overall, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S shows a slight advantage in NVH performance over the Falken Azenis FK460 AS, particularly in noise reduction, likely due to its silent foam technology. However, the differences in comfort and noise levels are relatively minor, demonstrating that both tires perform well in terms of NVH, an important aspect for OE manufacturers who prioritize a comfortable and quiet driving experience.
Azenis FK460 AS :
- -1% in subjective comfort
- -2% in subjective noise
Rolling Resistance
When we compare the rolling resistance of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S and the Falken Azenis FK460 AS, it’s clear that Goodyear has made a significant effort to optimize this aspect, especially important for electric vehicles (EVs) like the Tesla. Lower rolling resistance is crucial because it directly influences the battery range of EVs – the lower the rolling resistance, the higher the efficiency and the longer the driving range, which is a key selling point.
The Goodyear tire shows a rolling resistance of 7.35 N/kN, while the Falken tire is higher at 9.38 N/kN. This difference means that the Goodyear tire requires less energy to maintain motion, translating to better efficiency and potentially longer battery life for an EV.
This performance reflects Goodyear’s focus on meeting the specific needs of EV manufacturers like Tesla, where rolling resistance is a top priority. However, it’s important to remember the inherent trade-off between wet braking performance and rolling resistance. Lower rolling resistance often means a compromise in wet braking capabilities. As we saw earlier, the Falken tire, with its higher rolling resistance, actually performed better in wet braking tests.
Azenis FK460 AS :
- -22% in rolling resistance
UTQG rating
In the UTQG (Uniform Tire Quality Grading) performance comparison between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S and the Falken Azenis FK460 AS, we can see some interesting contrasts, particularly in the area of tread wear. UTQG ratings are a standardized system intended to help consumers compare tires in terms of tread wear, traction, and temperature resistance.
| Brand | Tireline | Size | Tread Wear | Traction | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodyear | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S | All | 500 | A | A |
| Falken | Azenis FK460 AS | All | 680 | A | A |
Starting with tread wear, which is a measure of the tire’s durability and longevity, the Goodyear has a tread wear rating of 500. In comparison, the Falken tire boasts a higher rating of 680. This suggests that the Falken Azenis FK460 AS has a longer expected lifespan than the Goodyear. It’s worth noting here the difference in tread depth, with the Falken having a depth of 7.7mm compared to the Goodyear’s 6.6mm, which likely contributes to its higher tread wear rating.
Both tires score equally in terms of traction and temperature, with ratings of ‘A’ in both categories. This indicates that they are expected to perform similarly well in terms of grip on wet surfaces (traction) and resistance to heat (temperature).
Another point of comparison is the mileage warranty. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S does not come with a mileage warranty, while the Falken Azenis FK460 AS offers a 65,000-mile warranty. This warranty further underscores the Falken’s higher tread wear rating, indicating a commitment by the manufacturer to the tire’s longevity.
Price
In terms of pricing for the tire size 255/55 R20, there is a significant difference between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S and the Falken Azenis FK460 AS. The Goodyear tire is priced at $350, whereas the Falken tire is considerably more affordable at $215. This price difference means that the Falken Azenis FK460 AS is about 63% cheaper than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S.
Tire size: 255/40 R20
- Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S : $ 350
- Azenis FK460 AS : $ 215
Difference: -63% more cheaper for Azenis FK460 AS
Summary
As a tire expert analyzing the battle between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 M+S and the Falken Azenis FK460 AS, it’s evident that each tire presents clear trade-offs. The Falken excels in wet and snow performance, also offering a significant advantage with its mileage. On the other hand, the Goodyear shines in dry performance and lower rolling resistance, which is particularly beneficial for electric vehicles like the Tesla Model Y.
In my professional opinion, I would lean towards the Falken Azenis FK460 AS, primarily due to its technical superiority in wet and snow conditions, coupled with the added benefit of a mileage warranty. These aspects contribute significantly to overall safety, an essential factor in tire selection. Additionally, the Falken tire offers substantial cost savings, which is a crucial consideration for many drivers.
While the Goodyear tire’s lower rolling resistance is a notable advantage, especially for maximizing EV efficiency, I believe the trade-off for better wet and snow performance and the cost-effectiveness of the Falken tire make it a more appealing choice overall. In the end, the decision comes down to prioritizing what aspects are most important for your driving needs and conditions. But from a technical and value-for-money standpoint, the Falken Azenis FK460 AS stands out as a compelling option.
Dr Edwin Pang