Skip to Content

Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2

Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3: Previously, we pit the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 against the sporty CrossClimate 3 Sport. But now, it’s time for the real clash — SF3 vs the standard Michelin CrossClimate 3. Both are brand-new 2024/25 launches, both carry the 3PMSF badge, and both claim to be the future of all-season performance. It’s the ultimate battle of comfort, grip, and year-round versatility — who will come out on top? Let’s find out.

Results: Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2

Results below were taken from the 2026 Auto Bild’s All Season SUV Test. The graph below shows the comparison between Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 based on the relevant performance category. The Michelin CrossClimate 3 tire was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.

The tire size of interest is a 225/55 R18 which is a common tire size for Subaru Forester or Kia Sportage series. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle of choice is a Mini Countryman.

Testing Vehicle of Choice: Mini Countryman on snow handling

Wet

In wet braking, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 takes the lead, stopping at 51.8 m compared to 55.2 m for the Michelin CrossClimate 3. That’s 3.4 m shorter, a 7% advantage for Vredestein. Michelin narrowly leads in wet handling at 83.1 km/h versus 82.9 km/h, just 0.2 km/h faster (0%).

In straight aquaplaning, Vredestein edges ahead at 97.61 km/h versus 97.46 km/h, a tiny 0.15 km/h advantage (0%). Overall, the Quatrac Pro 2 wins the wet battle, thanks to its impressive 7% wet braking advantage, while both tires remain practically identical in wet handling and aquaplaning.

Quatrac Pro 2:

  • +7% in wet braking
  • 0% in wet handling
  • 0% in aquaplaning

Snow

In snow braking, the Michelin CrossClimate 3 takes the lead, stopping at 24.9 m compared to 25.9 m for the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2, a 1 m shorter braking distance (4%). Michelin extends its advantage in snow traction, generating 3,917 N compared to 3,564 N for Vredestein, a 353 N advantage (9%).

In snow handling, Michelin maintains a narrow lead at 63.3 km/h versus 62.5 km/h, just 0.8 km/h faster (1%). Overall, the CrossClimate 3 wins the snow battle, with its strongest advantage coming from snow traction, where it outperforms the Quatrac Pro 2 by 9%.

CrossClimate 3:

  • -4% in snow braking
  • -9% in snow traction
  • -1% in snow handling

Dry

In dry braking, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 takes the lead, stopping at 39.4 m compared to 40.01 m for the Michelin CrossClimate 3, a 0.61 m shorter braking distance (2%).

In dry handling, Michelin narrowly leads at 113.4 km/h compared to 113.1 km/h for Vredestein, just 0.3 km/h faster (0%). Overall, the Quatrac Pro 2 has a slight edge in dry performance, thanks to its 2% braking advantage, while both tires are practically identical in dry handling.

CrossClimate 3:

  • +2% in dry braking
  • 0% in dry handling

NVH


In exterior noise at 60 km/h, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 takes the lead, recording 65.5 dB compared to 67.1 dB for the Michelin CrossClimate 3. That’s 1.6 dB quieter, giving Vredestein a 2% advantage. Overall, the Quatrac Pro 2 is the quieter tire in this test.

CrossClimate 3:

  • +2% in exterior noise (-1.6 dB)

Rolling Resistance


In rolling resistance, the Michelin CrossClimate 3 takes the lead, recording 7.06 kg/t compared to 7.64 kg/t for the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2. That’s 0.58 kg/t lower, giving Michelin an 8% advantage. Overall, the CrossClimate 3 offers better rolling resistance performance, potentially contributing to lower fuel consumption and improved efficiency.

CrossClimate 3:

  • -8% in rolling resistance

Price


For tire size 225/55 R18, the Michelin CrossClimate 3 costs €159, while the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 is priced at €133. That’s a €26 difference, making the Quatrac Pro 2 16% cheaper than the CrossClimate 3, giving Vredestein a clear advantage in purchase price.

Tire size: 225/55 R18

  • CrossClimate 3 : € 159
  • Quatrac Pro 2 : € 133

Difference: -16% more cheaper for Quatrac Pro 2

Conclusion

From my perspective as a tire expert, both tires have clear strengths. The Michelin CrossClimate 3 is my preferred choice for winter performance, with better snow braking, 9% stronger snow traction and 8% lower rolling resistance, making it a well-balanced option for year-round driving.

However, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 is a serious challenger, delivering 7% better wet braking, 2% better dry braking and lower exterior noise, all while costing 16% less. For drivers prioritizing wet safety and value for money, I would lean towards the Quatrac Pro 2. But if snow performance and efficiency matter more, the CrossClimate 3 remains my pick.

Dr Edwin Pang
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]