Hankook iON evo AS vs Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4: On one side, the Hankook iON evo AS—built from the bead up for electric vehicles, tuned for near-silent cruising, instant-torque launches, and maximum range. On the other, the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4—an ultra-high-performance all-season legend famed for razor-sharp handling and year-round grip. Two missions, one showdown: EV-specific efficiency and quiet comfort vs. UHP excitement and all-season athleticism. Which tire truly unlocks your EV’s potential? Buckle up—the battle for the perfect electric drive starts now!
Table of Contents
Results: Hankook iON evo AS vs Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
Results below were taken from Tire Rack’s Testing EV Tires 2024 test. A total of 9 tires were tested on Tire Rack’s proving ground including a variety of different segment tires. The graph below shows the comparison between Hankook iON evo AS vs Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 based on the relevant performance category. The Hankook iON evo AS was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
As both tires are categorized as all season tires, Tire Rack has conducted the snow & ice in its testing portfolio. The tire size of interest is a 235/40R19 which is a common tire size for Tesla Model 3. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle for this tire test is a 2023 Tesla Model 3 Performance.
Wet
In wet braking, the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 stops 12.3 feet shorter than the Hankook iON evo AS, which is a 13% advantage in favor of Michelin. In wet handling, the Michelin also completes the lap 1.45 seconds faster than the Hankook, translating to a 5% quicker time. Overall, the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 clearly delivers stronger wet performance, offering shorter stopping distances and sharper handling when it matters most.
Pilot Sport All Season 4 :
- +13% in wet braking
- +5% in wet handling (lap time)
Dry
In dry braking, the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 stops 5 feet shorter than the Hankook iON evo AS, giving it a 6% advantage. In dry handling, the Michelin is slightly faster, completing the lap 0.04 seconds quicker than the Hankook, which is effectively a 0% difference. In the dry, both tires are very close, but the Michelin still holds a slight edge with its noticeably better braking performance.
Pilot Sport All Season 4 :
- +6% in dry braking
- ~0% in dry handling (lap time)
Power Consumption
In terms of efficiency, the Hankook iON evo AS consumes 29 watt-hours per mile less than the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, making it about 10% more efficient. For EV drivers focused on maximizing range, the Hankook clearly offers a significant advantage in energy savings.
Pilot Sport All Season 4 :
- -10% in power consumption (efficiency)
Snow
In snow braking, the Hankook iON evo AS stops 15.5 feet shorter than the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, giving it a 15% advantage. In snow acceleration, the Hankook also pulls ahead by needing 2.3 feet less distance to get up to 12 mph, which is a 6% improvement. For subjective snow handling, the Hankook scores 1.42 points higher than the Michelin, a strong 7% better rating. In snow handling lap time, the Hankook is 2.1 seconds faster, showing a 3% advantage.
Overall, the Hankook iON evo AS is clearly the better choice when winter weather hits, offering stronger braking, quicker acceleration, better control, and faster handling in snow conditions.
Pilot Sport All Season 4 :
- -15% in snow braking
- -6% in snow acceleration
- -7% in snow handling (subj)
- -3% in snow handling(lap time)
Ice
In ice braking, the Hankook iON evo AS stops 11.2 feet shorter than the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, giving it a 17% advantage. This confirms that the Hankook delivers much stronger ice braking performance, making it a safer choice for icy conditions.
Pilot Sport All Season 4 :
- -17% in ice braking
UTQG ratings
The Hankook iON evo AS has a UTQG treadwear rating of 600, which is 11% higher than the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4’s rating of 540, indicating better expected durability. In terms of mileage warranty, the Hankook offers 50,000 miles compared to Michelin’s 45,000 miles, giving the Hankook a 11% longer coverage. Overall, the Hankook iON evo AS promises slightly better tread life both by official ratings and by warranty terms, making it the more durable option on paper.
| Brand | Tireline | Size | Tread Wear | Traction | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook | iON evo AS | All | 600 | A | A |
| Michelin | Pilot Sport All Season 4 | All | 540 | AA | A |
Price
In 235/40R19 size, the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 is $9 more expensive than the Hankook iON evo AS, making it 3% pricier. The Hankook offers a slight price advantage while delivering better efficiency and winter performance.
Tire size: 235/40R19
- iON evo AS : $267
- Pilot Sport All Season 4 : $276
Difference: +3% more expensive for Pilot Sport All Season 4.
Summary
From my perspective as a tire expert, the Hankook iON evo AS impresses with its superior efficiency, stronger snow and ice performance, longer tread life, and slightly lower price—making it a smart choice for EV drivers who prioritize range and winter safety. Meanwhile, the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 stands out with its sharper wet and dry braking and handling, offering a more dynamic driving experience for those who value all-season performance and sporty feel. Both are excellent tires, but the right choice depends on whether you prioritize efficiency and winter grip or all-around driving precision.
Dr Edwin Pang