Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005: The Ultimate Middle European Winter Showdown –> As winter tightens its grip on the heart of Europe, the battle between giants in tire technology heats up the snowy terrain. Representing two of the most revered names in tire manufacturing, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 are more than just pieces of rubber – they are winter warriors, champions of the icy expanse, and protectors against nature’s harshest challenges.
On one side, we have the Dunlop Winter Sport 5, boasting its legacy of superb road grip and precision handling. Dunlop has always been synonymous with innovation, and with the Winter Sport 5, they’ve embraced an adaptive design to deliver optimum performance in the wet, dry, and icy conditions. A hero of diverse landscapes, its deep tread grooves ensure constant contact with the road, promising unyielding grip and unmatched control.
On the opposing front stands the formidable Bridgestone Blizzak LM005. Bridgestone, a name that resonates with quality and trust, has crafted the Blizzak LM005 with advanced rubber compounds that offer exemplary grip on ice and snow. Its unique tread pattern is meticulously designed, focusing on evacuating water and slush efficiently. This tire is not just about performance; it’s about instilling confidence in drivers as they navigate the unpredictable winter terrains of Middle Europe.
As the cold winds of Middle Europe beckon, a legendary showdown unfolds. Two titans, representing the pinnacle of winter tire technology, are set to redefine winter driving. Get ready, Europe: this isn’t just a battle; it’s an epic dance of strength, precision, and endurance! Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 – let the winter games begin!
Table of Contents
Results: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Results below were taken from 2023 ADAC Winter Tire Test with a total of 15 tires tested. The graph below shows the comparison between Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 based on the relevant performance category. The Winter Sport 5 was set as a reference hence at the 100% mark.
Since we are talking about winter segment with both tires having the converted 3 peak mountain logo, the snow & ice performance was tested. The tire size of interest is a 225/45 R17 which is a common tire size for Volvo S60 & BMW 3 Series. You can check out our latest tire size table for more information. The testing vehicle is a Volkswagen Golf.
Wet
Wet performance is a pivotal metric for winter tires, especially in regions like Middle Europe where wet conditions frequently challenge drivers. Ensuring a firm grip, quick responsiveness, and short braking distance on wet roads is imperative for optimal safety. Here’s how the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 measure up in wet performance:
- Wet Braking
Stopping swiftly on wet roads can be the difference between a close call and a collision. In the wet braking test, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 edges ahead with a remarkable stopping distance of 36.6 meters. In comparison, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 takes a slightly longer 39.4 meters to come to a halt. The shorter braking span for the Blizzak LM005 underscores its dependable performance in sudden wet braking scenarios.
- Straight Aquaplaning
Facing aquaplaning—a situation where tires lose contact with the road because of water accumulation—is daunting for any driver. In the straight aquaplaning test, the Blizzak LM005 stands out with a slipping speed of 76.8 Km/H, indicating superior water dispersion capabilities. The Dunlop Winter Sport 5, though commendable, recorded a slipping speed at 73.8 Km/H.
- Curved Aquaplaning
Navigating curves on wet roads demands tire excellence. In the curved aquaplaning domain, the results are almost neck-to-neck. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 attains a max centripetal acceleration of 3.2 m/sec^2, marginally surpassing the Dunlop Winter Sport 5’s 3.1 m/sec^2. This suggests that both tires maintain remarkable stability and grip even when taking on wet bends, with the Blizzak LM005 having a slight advantage.
In conclusion, while both the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 offer noteworthy wet performance, the Blizzak LM005 emerges as the clear winner in this wet battleground. Its consistent edge across various wet performance metrics makes it an unrivaled choice for drivers navigating Middle European wet winters.
Blizzak LM005:
- +8% in wet braking
- +4% in straight aquaplaning
- +3% in curved aquaplaning
Snow
Snow performance stands as one of the most crucial metrics for winter tires, particularly in regions frequently affected by snowfalls. The ability to stop promptly and maintain traction on snow-clad roads can significantly influence a driver’s confidence and safety. Here, we’ll investigate how the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 stack up against each other in snowy conditions, bearing in mind the surprising results from the LM005 compared to previous year’s data.
- Snow Braking
Braking promptly on snowy terrains is essential to prevent any mishaps. In the snow braking test, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 exhibits superior performance, registering a stopping distance of 9.4 meters, while the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 trailed slightly at 9.9 meters. While both figures are commendable, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5’s shorter distance means it can halt a fraction quicker in snowy situations.
- Snow Traction
Traction is the tire’s ability to grip the road or, in this case, the snow. Measured in terms of pulling force in Newtons, it provides insight into how well a tire can propel a vehicle forward on snowy surfaces. Here, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 shines once more, recording a pulling force of 258.2 N. In contrast, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 displayed a force of 237.1 N, indicating that while it offers reliable traction, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 edges out with stronger adherence to snowy grounds.
Reflecting on the data, while the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 consistently outperformed in both tests, what’s genuinely surprising is the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005’s results compared to the previous year’s findings. Historically, Bridgestone’s Blizzak range has been known for its exceptional snow performance. The current test results, though slightly trailing the Dunlop Winter Sport 5, still showcase the LM005’s commendable prowess in snowy terrains, but the divergence from past results certainly raises eyebrows and might lead consumers and enthusiasts to delve deeper into the nuances of the tire’s evolution.
Blizzak LM005:
- -5% in snow braking
- -8% in snow traction
Ice
Ice performance remains one of the most challenging metrics for winter tires. As many know, icy conditions are the ultimate test, presenting unpredictable and treacherous terrains that demand utmost tire precision and responsiveness. Interestingly, not all press test magazines delve into this crucial aspect of winter tire performance. Thankfully, ADAC continues to prioritize this area, offering insightful data that drivers and enthusiasts find invaluable. Especially commendable is the use of the ice hall for these tests, where the high humidity levels simulate some of the most challenging real-world icy conditions a driver might encounter.
- Ice Braking
Braking on ice is perhaps one of the most nerve-wracking experiences for any driver. The tire’s ability to halt the vehicle with minimal slippage can often spell the difference between safety and an unfortunate event. In this comparison, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 showcased its proficiency on icy terrains, recording an impressive braking distance of 20.2 meters from a speed of 20 km/h. On the other hand, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, although competent in its own right, took a slightly longer 22.1 meters to come to a complete stop under the same conditions.
Drawing from this, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 edges out with a superior performance on ice, especially in terms of braking. But it’s essential to note that both tires display commendable capabilities, considering the challenging conditions under which they’re tested. The elevated humidity in the ice hall only intensifies these challenges, making the results all the more impressive.
In conclusion, while ice might be an aspect overlooked by some publications, it remains integral to understanding winter tire performance in totality. Both the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 have showcased their merits, with the former taking a slight lead in this icy showdown. Hats off to ADAC for continuing to shed light on this paramount aspect of winter driving.
Blizzak LM005:
- -9% in ice braking
Wear
Wear performance is a fundamental aspect when evaluating the overall value and longevity of winter tires. It not only reflects the tire’s durability but also translates to long-term cost-effectiveness for users. Today, we’re delving into the wear performance of the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005. And to be candid, the results are quite astonishing.
- Wear
The disparity between the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 in terms of wear is notable. The Dunlop Winter Sport 5 demonstrates commendable resilience, clocking in an impressive 61,500 KM before signs of significant wear. Its robust performance secured it a laudable 2nd place among tested tires.
Contrastingly, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005’s wear performance is rather startling. Previous encounters have indeed highlighted its generally lower mileage, typically trailing by around 20-30%. However, this time, it has hit a new low, registering only 36,100 KM – placing it at the very end, 15th out of 15. This precipitous drop in wear performance is both unexpected and concerning for such a renowned brand.
- Abrasion
Abrasion, a complementary metric to wear, further paints the picture. The Dunlop Winter Sport 5 stands strong with 65.3 mg/km/t, underlining its consistent performance in both wear and abrasion. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, on the other hand, continues its downward trend with a significantly higher abrasion rate of 98.5 mg/km/t, indicating faster material loss.
It’s crucial to address the evident trade-off, or as some might call, the “target conflict” between wet performance and wear. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, while having certain merits in wet performance, seems to grapple with this balance, compromising wear longevity. Dunlop, however, appears to have struck a better harmony, showcasing both reliable wet handling and superior wear resistance.
To sum it up, while we hold high regard for both brands, this round of testing has thrown a curveball. Dunlop’s consistent performance is commendable, while the dramatic drop in wear for the LM005 is genuinely shocking. Bridgestone might have to revisit their design philosophy, especially considering the stark contrast between wet performance and wear longevity seen in the LM005.
Blizzak LM005:
- -41% in mileage
- -34% in abrasion
Dry
While winter tires are primarily designed for performance in snowy and icy conditions, their behavior on dry roads is equally significant. A good winter tire must provide stability, responsiveness, and safety across all terrains, including dry pavements. Let’s delve into how the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 compare in terms of dry performance.
- Dry Braking
Braking efficiency on dry roads is a critical parameter. It determines how quickly a vehicle can come to a stop during unexpected scenarios, potentially preventing accidents. In the dry braking test, both tires showcased competent performance, but with slight differences. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 took the lead with a stopping distance of 43.7 meters. On the other hand, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 registered a marginally longer braking distance at 45.3 meters.
While the difference of 1.6 meters may seem trivial, in emergency braking situations, every fraction of a meter can be crucial. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005’s shorter stopping distance gives it an edge in dry braking scenarios over the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.
In conclusion, both the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 display commendable dry road performance. Yet, when it boils down to the specifics of dry braking, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 has a slight advantage, further solidifying its well-rounded performance across various conditions.
Blizzak LM005:
- +4% in dry braking
Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption, influenced by factors like rolling resistance, is an essential metric in tire evaluations, especially when considering the environmental and economic impacts. Rather than relying solely on rolling resistance values, this comparison uses fuel consumption figures, which provide a more direct and tangible measurement for consumers. Let’s delve into how the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 measure up in terms of fuel efficiency.
- Fuel Consumption
The Dunlop Winter Sport 5, with a fuel consumption rate of 5.5 l/100km, slightly edges out over the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, which registers at 5.7 l/100km. The difference, though marginal, can have implications over extended periods, potentially leading to savings for the consumer.
However, it’s noteworthy to mention that the disparity between these two tires is minimal, and the entire field is closely contested, with the range covered by only 0.3 l/100km. This tight clustering implies that most of the tires tested are optimized for fuel efficiency, with only minute differences setting them apart.
In conclusion, while the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 has a slight advantage in fuel consumption over the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, the difference is negligible in the grander scheme of things. With the entire field so closely packed, it’s evident that tire manufacturers are giving due attention to fuel efficiency, ensuring that consumers receive the best performance while also keeping their carbon footprint and fuel costs in check.
Blizzak LM005:
- -4% in fuel consumption
Exterior Noise
In the noise evaluation, both tires display relatively close figures, indicative of their commitment to offering a quieter ride. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 registers a slightly lower noise level at 73.7 dB, compared to the Dunlop Winter Sport 5’s 74.3 dB. While the difference of 0.6 dB is minimal, the Blizzak LM005 has a marginal edge in terms of offering a quieter external environment when in motion.
Blizzak LM005:
- +1% in exterior noise (-0.6 dB)
Price
For the tire size 205/55 R16, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is priced at £102, making it 3% cheaper than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5, which is priced at £105.
Tire size: 205/55 R16
- Winter Sport 5: £ 105
- Blizzak LM005: £ 102
Difference: -3% more cheaper for Blizzak LM005
Expert Conclusion
Having closely examined and compared both tires across a variety of parameters, I’ve distilled my observations into the following insights:
The Dunlop Winter Sport 5 excels in many fronts – it offers commendable ice performance, durability with remarkable wear results, and is quite fuel-efficient. This tire surely holds its own in terms of reliability and longevity. On the other hand, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, while coming in at a slightly lower price point and impressing with its wet performance and quieter ride, leaves something to be desired in terms of wear.
For me, as an expert deeply invested in comprehensive tire performance, the wear factor of the LM005 was its significant downfall in this test. It’s crucial for a tire not just to perform well but to last, delivering value over time. Given the holistic view of the performance, quality, and value of both tires, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 stands out. Hence, with the overall package considered, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 is our declared winner!
Dr Edwin Pang